Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 28 Mar 2024
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
* Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
12:32 Exeter Central to Okehampton
12:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:26 Okehampton to Exeter Central
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Delayed
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:29 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
12:27 Okehampton to Exeter Central
12:28 Plymouth to Gunnislake
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 13:20:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[151] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[85] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[58] Return of the BRUTE?
[49] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[46] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[36] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Scotland to France - though train service - 1999 to 2000  (Read 1047 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: January 15, 2022, 21:33:09 »

From my National Rail timetable, 1999 - 2000.   Never ran?

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2022, 21:40:25 »

In my National Rail timetable, 1999 - 2000, those are tables 352 and 353, and are headed "Proposed services only. These planned regional Eurostar services are subject to review."
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2022, 22:08:40 »

They'd been never running for some time - from the Staffordshire Sentinel 30 March 1995 - a timeline of tunnel/Eurostar events ends with: "Early 1996: Eurostar regional service scheduled to begin, stopping at Crewe and Stafford."

I guess that timetable represents step one in the process, identifying paths, and the lack of progress on the following steps never invalidated it. So it stayed there as "proposed". But the plan had been parked, like the stock, for many years.

Even before that timetable was finalised, you can find the Sunday Mirror 21 March 1999 going on (with a picture) about all these trains bought with taxpayers' money rotting away, "victims of the Eurostar dream that died". As well as the Nightstar fleet stored at Kineston since they were built in 1997, "Another £180million worth of regional trains are languishing in Manchester and London. Some are so derelict that foxes have nested in them... A Eurostar spokesman said: 'For the moment they are in long-term storage'".
« Last Edit: January 15, 2022, 22:24:14 by stuving » Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2022, 22:22:59 »

I did finally find a report about the schedules - from the Aberdeen Press and Journal 09 June 1999 (well, why not?). Headed "Ghost trains hold up services", it refers to the two empty paths from Manchester and one from Glasgow, and says "A Wolverhampton-Coventry service is held up for eight minutes every weekday from 8.01 to allow the non-existent Eurostar train to pas through the station."

The factual bit at the end says "When Eurostar first reserved the lines for these trains, it expected that regional services would be running soon. The company has since had to pay to keep the lines open in case the regional service becomes a viable proposition when the much-delayed high-speed link from London to the Channel tunnel is finally completed."
« Last Edit: January 17, 2022, 10:22:45 by stuving » Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2022, 07:09:18 »

There was a lot of money spent on the North London Line re-electrifying it to 25kV and electrifying the West London Line for the Eurostar Regional services.  Much of the loco hauled regional night stock sat in Northpole right up to 2007 when Eurostar moved out.

The regional services were the Government of the day form of attempting "levelling up"
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 514


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2022, 12:24:51 »

There was a lot of money spent on the North London Line re-electrifying it to 25kV and electrifying the West London Line for the Eurostar Regional services.  Much of the loco hauled regional night stock sat in Northpole right up to 2007 when Eurostar moved out.

The regional services were the Government of the day form of attempting "levelling up"

IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) the NightStar stock was sold to the Canadians in 2000

I think the credit for the day and night services is probably more due to BR (British Rail(ways)) than the UK (United Kingdom) Government, but indeed, it was arguably an attempt to make the
Channel Tunnel 'relevant' to the country beyond London.

Their failure was largely down to privatisation, which took them from being financially dubious, but sustainable within the broader BR entity, to insanely expensive as standalone services, and very visibly so, as they would probably have needed a heavy subsidy.

There's also the question of how well the 373's would have worked out technically beyond London (GNER (Great North Eastern Railways) did have them for Leeds services, but they were highly restricted in terms of route) and whether the customs/immigration issues would have worked out.

And then there's the question of how long a trip like Manchester to Paris would have taken, crawling round the West London line then across Kent on third rail. Remember also that the budget carriers like EasyJet and Ryanair were starting to make inroads at the time.

Don't forget also the security concerns of the time - the Channel Tunnel was felt to be a prime target for the IRA, and I'm sure that the security services would have been concerned that the 'north of London' services posed a soft target.

All that said, it is very interesting to ponder what might have happened had work on HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel) started earlier and BR's privatisation been put off a few years. Would HS1 with a decent connection to the ECML (East Coast Main Line) and WCML (West Coast Main Line) have made Birmingham/Manchester/Leeds services credible, and would that have created momentum to build new HS (High Speed (short for HSS (High Speed Services) High Speed Services)) lines north of London rather than upgrade the WCML?

Of course the other Eurotunnel question is if BR's privatisation had not taken place, might it have been the saviour of wagonload freight? But that's another matter :-)
Logged
1st fan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 402


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2022, 01:37:23 »

There was a lot of money spent on the North London Line re-electrifying it to 25kV and electrifying the West London Line for the Eurostar Regional services.  Much of the loco hauled regional night stock sat in Northpole right up to 2007 when Eurostar moved out.

The regional services were the Government of the day form of attempting "levelling up"

IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) the NightStar stock was sold to the Canadians in 2000

I think the credit for the day and night services is probably more due to BR (British Rail(ways)) than the UK (United Kingdom) Government, but indeed, it was arguably an attempt to make the
Channel Tunnel 'relevant' to the country beyond London.

Their failure was largely down to privatisation, which took them from being financially dubious, but sustainable within the broader BR entity, to insanely expensive as standalone services, and very visibly so, as they would probably have needed a heavy subsidy.

There's also the question of how well the 373's would have worked out technically beyond London (GNER (Great North Eastern Railways) did have them for Leeds services, but they were highly restricted in terms of route) and whether the customs/immigration issues would have worked out.

And then there's the question of how long a trip like Manchester to Paris would have taken, crawling round the West London line then across Kent on third rail. Remember also that the budget carriers like EasyJet and Ryanair were starting to make inroads at the time.

Don't forget also the security concerns of the time - the Channel Tunnel was felt to be a prime target for the IRA, and I'm sure that the security services would have been concerned that the 'north of London' services posed a soft target.

All that said, it is very interesting to ponder what might have happened had work on HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel) started earlier and BR's privatisation been put off a few years. Would HS1 with a decent connection to the ECML (East Coast Main Line) and WCML (West Coast Main Line) have made Birmingham/Manchester/Leeds services credible, and would that have created momentum to build new HS (High Speed (short for HSS (High Speed Services) High Speed Services)) lines north of London rather than upgrade the WCML?

Of course the other Eurotunnel question is if BR's privatisation had not taken place, might it have been the saviour of wagonload freight? But that's another matter :-)

From memory there were feasibility studies done on running “North of London”. These looked at the question of security/passport control at these stations. It was pointed out how difficult it would be to have a platform dedicated to just Eurostar and keep it secure. Then what happens if the service has to be diverted and the passport facilities at wherever they divert to? There were backup immigration facilities at Kensington Olympia whilst North Pole was still in use for Eurostar. I think privatisation as has mentioned earlier killed any further study into it along with the growth of budget airlines afterwards.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page