Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About
Waterloo Campaign
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 28 May 2022
- Travel disruption: 'We were on the plane when our flight was cancelled'
- Half-term travel: EasyJet and Tui cancel flights as queues form at Dover
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 11/06/22 - Excusrion to Kingswear
24/06/22 - TravelWatch SouthWest
16/07/22 - Railfuture AGM, Bristol
23/07/22 - 100 years / Hythe Pier

No 'On This Day' events reported for 28th May

Train RunningCancelled
23:17 Reading to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 28, 2022, 11:42:57 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[139] Rail Strike Looming
[74] Crossrail - a new railway for London
[56] 2022 - TransWilts cancellations and amendments log
[55] Heroes of WW2 to be honoured in train namings
[27] Where was I today? - 23 May 2022
[26] Adventures - Melksham to Brighton - 23.5.2022
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
Author Topic: Night Riviera to be reduced for eight weeks due to engineering work - Jan 2022  (Read 3029 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4848



View Profile
« Reply #45 on: January 25, 2022, 07:09:57 am »

Back in the good old days, the sleeper to Penzance ARRIVED very early in the morning at Plymouth, but a portion was detached  at Plymouth and passengers in this portion could stay in bed until a sensible hour. Much more customer friendly than the present arrangements.

Might not be allowed these days by the elfansafety though. Presumably the detached portion had no locomotive attached and therefore lacked steam or electric heat. Lighting would be limited to that available from the batteries which were HOPEFULLY better maintained on sleepers than on other stock. These days electricity is presumably also required for fire alarms, emergency call for aid systems and perhaps other purposes.

The brakes on the detached portion would be liable to "leak off" and a vehicle with a hand brake would presumably have to be included.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Pb_devon
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 274


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: January 25, 2022, 08:31:51 am »

Re: detaching at Plymouth.
There used to be a shunting loco kept at Plymouth Station for this purpose (also handling the postal, and other movements), with a shunting person. However this came at a cost to cover both morning and evening movements. Removing the sleeper portion for Plymouth saved this cost at the expense of customer convenience. The loco would remain attached to the sleeper carriage in Platform 8.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9209


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: January 25, 2022, 09:20:27 am »

Re: detaching at Plymouth.
There used to be a shunting loco kept at Plymouth Station for this purpose (also handling the postal, and other movements), with a shunting person. However this came at a cost to cover both morning and evening movements. Removing the sleeper portion for Plymouth saved this cost at the expense of customer convenience. The loco would remain attached to the sleeper carriage in Platform 8.

Wasn’t it the case that had those savings not been made, the sleeper was in danger of being axed completely?

It would take a lot of extra Plymouth passengers, at a time when business travel is very suppressed, to make a viable business case for portion attaching and detaching to commence again.  As well as the costs Pb_Devon refers to, those carriages would also need to be cleaned, watered and any light maintenance dealt with whilst they were separate from the main train during the day.

Perhaps one for GBR (Great British Railways) to ponder in the future?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 6256


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: January 25, 2022, 11:04:28 am »

I thought it was a bit surprising that sleeper services were expanded so much so late - up to the 1980s - before dropping sharply for the obvious reason. But that was not just the after-effect of wartime limitations. Looking for a few quotes on the subject, I was surprised to find out that all sleeping cars were first class until the 1920s. And if you look at early timetables you will find a lot of overnight trains, but few of them with sleeping car accommodation.

There were news reports of second class sleepers as a new idea in Italy and France in 1922, and at the same time making them compulsory in Britain was being discussed for inclusion in the Railways Act. Then in Daily News (London) 03 August 1928:
"Third-class sleepers | To be running in September | Coaches now being built | Third-class "sleepers" will be running on the British railways on September 24th. The work of building these coaches is going ahead as rapidly as possible, and it is expected that the initial demand from third-class sleeping facilities is one that will grow rapidly."
(Note the quotation marks, capitalisation, etc!)

Clearly the companies were not keen. You might like this discussion of the impact of amalgamation from 1927 (Hansard), as an interesting comparison with today. In it, Lord Monkswell for the opposition said:

Quote
With regard to third-class sleeping carriages, it would be indecent to expect the railway companies to abandon their first line of defence, so we are duly informed that they do not consider there is any demand for sleeping bunks of a simple type. After that we are told that third-class sleeping carriages would add too much to the weight of the trains and would be too expensive. My suggestion is that third-class sleeping carriages with three tiers of bunks of a simple construction exactly like those used in the ambulance trains during the War, should be introduced. The expense of building and maintaining carriages of this kind cannot differ appreciably from the expense of building and maintaining ordinary third-class carriages. They could be made to accommodate about three-quarters of the numbers of passengers which a third-class carriage of the same dimensions will accommodate and as the bunks would have to be reserved beforehand they could be better filled. There is no real difficulty in introducing them, and as for the absence of demand I do not believe a word of it.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10941


View Profile Email
« Reply #49 on: January 25, 2022, 11:07:14 am »

Yes, even into the 1970s, there were many ‘overnight’ trains….generally mail, milk & newspapers. Twas a regular user of them in my young(er) years, returning from late-nights out!
Logged
w056863
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 17


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: January 28, 2022, 06:01:36 pm »

I cant give the exact numbers but anecdotaly its the main way for Scillies residents to go up to London .

I remember being on the sleeper as a child and my parents whispering "that's Harold Wilson.... smell the pipe smoke.... looks like his copper has the cabin next to him...."

Must have been around mid-late '80s. Seemed to be Harold Wilson took the helicopter from Penzance, whilst we were on the "Vomit Vessel"
Logged
1st fan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 318


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: January 31, 2022, 07:46:02 pm »

Read this thread and read up on the works which sound difficult but needed. Then I wondered how the sleeper met the accessibility regulations. I googled that which lead me to this page which has a spreadsheet detailing the exemptions etc.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/heavy-rail-fleet-porterbrook-night-riviera-sleeper

Then I found another link via Google about the sleeper carriages, Porterbrook and accessibility. That lead me to the second document on that page

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/907753/gwr-night-riviera-dispensation_document.pdf

which is odd because there’s no mention of Porterbrook on it. Then I realised somebody at DaFT» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about) doesn’t know how to redact a document properly Shocked
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1506


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: February 01, 2022, 10:17:28 am »

And hopefully will not copy this https://ebiketips.road.cc/content/news/e-bikes-banned-from-caledonian-sleeper-trains-after-risk-assessment-3583
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page