Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:15 29 Mar 2024
* Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
* KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 11:20:24 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[132] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[52] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[51] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[32] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
Author Topic: Identitrax quiz  (Read 5093 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: February 28, 2022, 22:33:36 »

Do you have a date for the picture Grahame?

I’ve found a schematic of the present layout, Borough Market Jn is just a shadow of its former complexity, basically up services are now divided into 3 groups well before London Bridge, so there’s a dedicated track pair for each of Cannon St, Thameslink, and Charing Cross.

Paul
« Last Edit: February 28, 2022, 23:13:33 by paul7575 » Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: February 28, 2022, 23:36:48 »

This map shows the 1952 layout, and looks to be exactly as in the photo. From that you can see that all platforms can serve the four-track main line to London Bridge, and all except P1 (I think) on the east, or left, side serve the line round to Charing Cross.

So the tracks leading out upwards (and over the Thames) were four electrics, then one loco siding, then three non-electric merging to two, and then some more parking space. I don't see that pair on the right as in any way dedicated to the Charing cross route, for obvious reasons.  Pathing trains through there must have been a nightmare - all those reversals, but not in p1, and P6-9 being unelectrified! My local signallers know how embarrassing it is if you get that wrong.

Presumably those steam-hauled trains were to the coast, not electrified until ca. 1960. There's loads about that in this article from the Southern Electric Group. And did you spot this, still just in time to be on this day?
Quote
on 28th February 1926 full electric services were introduced from Charing Cross and Cannon Street to the Mid Kent line, Bromley North and Orpington.
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1704


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: March 01, 2022, 03:04:29 »

So where was the photo taken from?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #63 on: March 01, 2022, 06:49:19 »

So where was the photo taken from?

I understand that there was a signal box across the tracks and it was from there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon_Street_station#/media/File:Ian_Strang_-_Cannon_Street_Station_-_1923_-_Strang-Cannon.jpg
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: March 01, 2022, 09:47:28 »


I can see a couple of problems with that explanation - the signal box in the picture was further out than the end of the longest platform, and it was demolished in 1926 at the same time as the new trackwork and electrification being put in. The location of the signal box can be seen down in the bottom right corner of this map (revised 1915, but not published until 1936!). I presume the photo must have been taken from up on the the front wall of the station; while I can't see it was ever easily accessible, there must have been occasions like painting and repair work when it could have been done.

All that work took place during a three-week closure: 3 p.m. on Saturday June 5th to 4 a.m. on Monday 28th June 1926. There's even pictures (The Sphere 12 June 1926) of the work being done by a (not very) small army of men in typical 1920s workwear, with the signal box half removed. I don't think we could match that today - and it's not as if all that S&C (Settle and Carlisle ), with its rodding from a new signal box, plus coping with the newfangled colour lamp signalling, was really a lot simpler.

It was explained at the time that a complete closure allowed the work to be done much more quickly (day and night). This of course was just after the General Strike (4-12 May) and while the miners stayed on strike disrupting coal supplies, so the new timetable could not be introduced in full from day one. In addition, between the peaks the station was closed for several days for some finishing off and adjustments to be done.

Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: March 01, 2022, 10:54:11 »

I suppose as a general point, such complex layouts as we see here at Cannon St would probably not have used bi-directional lines to the extent they’re used nowadays.  Everything seemed to be designed to cross over right at the platform ends, up and down lines seemed sacrosanct further away, so was that a limitation of semaphore signalling?  Or was it just custom and practice to sort everything out in a short distance?

Paul
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #66 on: March 01, 2022, 11:22:00 »

I suppose as a general point, such complex layouts as we see here at Cannon St would probably not have used bi-directional lines to the extent they’re used nowadays.  Everything seemed to be designed to cross over right at the platform ends, up and down lines seemed sacrosanct further away, so was that a limitation of semaphore signalling?  Or was it just custom and practice to sort everything out in a short distance?

Paul

Thanks Paul and stuving for your thoughts ... agreed, probably from the main arched roof when folks were up there doing painting of other maintenance works.

Until the days of electric points, pointwork was clumped around signal boxes to allow for practical rodding, and with trains passing from one box to another under bell control, single direction working on each track was the norm - these things together effecting layout design.  These days, stuff can be spread out without needed signal (or rather point control) boxes all over the place.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: March 02, 2022, 11:29:50 »

I just dug out a book I have about Newcastle Central Station and the High Level Bridge, (HLB). The famous “east end diamonds”, which are often seen in photos as in picture 4, historically claimed a record for complexity, and are a great example where the early railway builders went for the maximum possible flexibility.   In the original 1893 layout, and somewhat before the west end King Edward Bridge was added, trains from the Gateshead side could reach the 3 through platforms, and all the east end bay platforms, 7 passenger platforms and a carriage dock. 

But the rationalisation started quickly, the diamonds only lasted in full form about 10 years, and by 1904 the easternmost lines leading from the HLB to platforms 1,2 and the dock were removed, this reduced the number of flat crossings significantly.  It had been decided that with north Tyneside electrification the first two platforms would be dedicated to the route towards Manors station.  This is the layout in the quiz picture.  The scale of the diamonds was reduced again in 1969, long before the Metro was proposed, and as before they now removed the next easternmost route from the HLB into platform 3.

The maintenance requirements were huge.  Complete replacement took place on about 8 separate occasions, say every ten years, but with constant problems of broken rails, and significant issues with track circuits.

I hope forum members find this YouTube photo montage interesting,  but please note from the dates it doesn’t actually go back as far as the 1893 full monty layout:

https://youtu.be/zdLW3h9yY-s
« Last Edit: March 09, 2022, 19:40:50 by paul7575 » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page