Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 02:55 02 Dec 2023
- Train strikes: Drivers vote to continue walkouts
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/12/23 - Winter Timetable starts
24/12/23 - Paddington closed
25/12/23 - No GWR trains
26/12/23 - No GWR trains (why not?)

No 'On This Day' events reported for 2nd Dec

Train RunningCancelled
03:56 Swansea to London Paddington
05:43 London Paddington to Greenford
06:10 Greenford to West Ealing
02/12/23 06:19 Bristol Temple Meads to Taunton
06:45 West Ealing to Greenford
02/12/23 06:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:00 Greenford to West Ealing
07:15 West Ealing to Greenford
07:22 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
07:30 Greenford to West Ealing
07:45 West Ealing to Greenford
08:00 Greenford to West Ealing
02/12/23 08:19 Taunton to Cardiff Central
09:23 Swansea to London Paddington
09:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
10:51 St Erth to St Ives
11:05 St Ives to St Erth
13:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
15:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
02/12/23 17:30 Greenford to West Ealing
17:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
17:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:17 Taunton to Cardiff Central
18:46 Frome to Bristol Temple Meads
18:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
19:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
20:02 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
20:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Bristol Temple Meads
20:18 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
21:07 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
21:26 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:50 Plymouth to Exeter St Davids
22:18 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
22:47 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:30 Bristol Temple Meads to Swindon
23:41 Newbury to Bedwyn
03/12/23 06:38 London Paddington to Reading
Short Run
02/12/23 06:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
02/12/23 07:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
02/12/23 07:41 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
02/12/23 08:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
02/12/23 08:30 London Paddington to Taunton
02/12/23 08:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
09:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
11:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
11:32 Taunton to London Paddington
13:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
13:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:18 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
13:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
13:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
14:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
14:02 Westbury to Gloucester
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
16:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
16:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
16:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
17:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:28 Swansea to London Paddington
17:41 Bristol Temple Meads to Frome
17:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:00 Cardiff Central to Plymouth
18:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
19:10 Taunton to Gloucester
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:58 Taunton to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2023-11-27 Should passengers be allowed to eat on the train?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 02, 2023, 03:12:59 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[138] Transport Focus to GWR on short formed trains and overcrowding
[136] Park Junction
[102] Advent Quiz, December 2023, Introduction and day 1 (1st Decemb...
[60] 2023 Delays and Cancellations
[36] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023
[16] Cyclists - death toll on our roads
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
  Print  
Author Topic: Rail Strike Looming  (Read 10827 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18759



View Profile
« Reply #105 on: June 01, 2022, 08:10:19 pm »

However it would seem that NR» (Network Rail - home page) (aka DfT» (Department for Transport - about) / No10) have made a 2.5% pay offer from 1st July 2022 to the TSSA» (Transport Salaried Staffs' Association - about) for management grades, the TSSA have said this offer does not resolve the dispute ..................... negotiations / haggling continues

Good to see at least one rail union doing things correctly and negotiating before resorting to a strike ballot. I expect ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about) will be/are doing the same.

Logged

"The dispicable rip off of the last 30 years has truly been nothing but a great train robbery." - Ben Elton

Full public ownership of the railways. Now!
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9923


View Profile
« Reply #106 on: June 01, 2022, 08:18:25 pm »

A belief? Any corroboration?

Last week the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) urged the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) to come to the negotiating table. Saying they were disappointed that the RMT had balloted for strike action before entering negotiations. Someone's lying. Much as I loathe the current government I believe them in this instance.

Only what I’ve heard (hence my wording).  Though I’ve heard it straight from the mouth of a union branch secretary.

The RMT have been at the negotiating table subsequent to the ballot result.  What is unclear is what offer to negotiate took place from either party before the ballot.

I believe (there I go again) that ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about) are balloting in the next few days.

I’m not sure I believe either side, especially given the sneaky way the DfT have been operating recently.  In many ways they’re welcome to each other.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7444



View Profile
« Reply #107 on: June 02, 2022, 08:03:15 am »

A belief? Any corroboration?

Last week the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) urged the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) to come to the negotiating table. Saying they were disappointed that the RMT had balloted for strike action before entering negotiations. Someone's lying. Much as I loathe the current government I believe them in this instance.

Only what I’ve heard (hence my wording).  Though I’ve heard it straight from the mouth of a union branch secretary.

The RMT have been at the negotiating table subsequent to the ballot result.  What is unclear is what offer to negotiate took place from either party before the ballot.

I believe (there I go again) that ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about) are balloting in the next few days.

I’m not sure I believe either side, especially given the sneaky way the DfT have been operating recently.  In many ways they’re welcome to each other.

ASLEF rejected 4.2% from Scotrail yesterday.

RDG(resolve), NR» (Network Rail - home page) and DfT have all confirmed that the RMT balloted for strike action/action short of a strike without engaging in meaningful discussions first.

Important to remember that Lynch, Gordon, Dempsey and the rest of them have a political agenda which somewhat transcends the accepted norms in this respect, which whilst often strained, could at least be constructive.

A look at the RMT's political affiliations is quite enlightening.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4245


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #108 on: June 02, 2022, 09:41:55 am »

However it would seem that NR» (Network Rail - home page) (aka DfT» (Department for Transport - about) / No10) have made a 2.5% pay offer from 1st July 2022 to the TSSA» (Transport Salaried Staffs' Association - about) for management grades, the TSSA have said this offer does not resolve the dispute ..................... negotiations / haggling continues

Good to see at least one rail union doing things correctly and negotiating before resorting to a strike ballot. I expect ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about) will be/are doing the same.



The TSSA did hold a strike ballot which came out as resounding yes vote
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4397


View Profile
« Reply #109 on: June 02, 2022, 11:57:25 am »

RDG(resolve), NR» (Network Rail - home page) and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have all confirmed that the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) balloted for strike action/action short of a strike without engaging in meaningful discussions first.
Who decides what is meaningful?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 6989


View Profile
« Reply #110 on: June 02, 2022, 01:09:52 pm »

RDG(resolve), NR» (Network Rail - home page) and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have all confirmed that the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) balloted for strike action/action short of a strike without engaging in meaningful discussions first.
Who decides what is meaningful?

Quite. I imagine that the employers will say "we've been trying to negotiate for some time" and the unions will say "DfT's instructions have taken so much off the table that no real negotiation is possible".
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 9923


View Profile
« Reply #111 on: June 02, 2022, 03:03:43 pm »

RDG(resolve), NR» (Network Rail - home page) and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have all confirmed that the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) balloted for strike action/action short of a strike without engaging in meaningful discussions first.

Makes it sound like the RMT weren't interested in meaningful discussions, doesn't it?  However, Nigel Harris, editor of RAIL magazine, says in a very good latest editorial that the DfT only gave Network Rail permission to start formal discussions with the unions less than a week before the RMT ballot result was in.

Why weren't they given permission earlier I wonder?

Anyway, now discussions are ongoing, hopefully a resolution can be found that avoids widespread strikes.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4245


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #112 on: June 02, 2022, 04:26:44 pm »

RDG(resolve), NR» (Network Rail - home page) and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have all confirmed that the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) balloted for strike action/action short of a strike without engaging in meaningful discussions first.

Makes it sound like the RMT weren't interested in meaningful discussions, doesn't it?  However, Nigel Harris, editor of RAIL magazine, says in a very good latest editorial that the DfT only gave Network Rail permission to start formal discussions with the unions less than a week before the RMT ballot result was in.

Why weren't they given permission earlier I wonder?

Anyway, now discussions are ongoing, hopefully a resolution can be found that avoids widespread strikes.

Absolutely correct, NR Exc started talks with the Unions several months ago but there were no firm proposals put before the Unions by the Exc, the phase was 'we are just looking at ideas and want staff involvement' it was this approach ie no firm proposals that got the Unions and their members backs up.  There are normally good but robust relations between NR Exc and the Unions
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7444



View Profile
« Reply #113 on: June 02, 2022, 09:02:25 pm »

RDG(resolve), NR» (Network Rail - home page) and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have all confirmed that the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) balloted for strike action/action short of a strike without engaging in meaningful discussions first.

Makes it sound like the RMT weren't interested in meaningful discussions, doesn't it?  However, Nigel Harris, editor of RAIL magazine, says in a very good latest editorial that the DfT only gave Network Rail permission to start formal discussions with the unions less than a week before the RMT ballot result was in.

Why weren't they given permission earlier I wonder?

Anyway, now discussions are ongoing, hopefully a resolution can be found that avoids widespread strikes.

Absolutely correct, NR Exc started talks with the Unions several months ago but there were no firm proposals put before the Unions by the Exc, the phase was 'we are just looking at ideas and want staff involvement' it was this approach ie no firm proposals that got the Unions and their members backs up.  There are normally good but robust relations between NR Exc and the Unions

Do you have a citation/source for that?

It'd certainly help the RMT's case if verified.
Logged
jbsdjr
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


View Profile Email
« Reply #114 on: June 03, 2022, 11:28:49 am »

The key issue for me (and I suspect if the truth is known  Mark Hopwood and his teams) is the current stranglehold on GWER services that the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have as a result of not yet allowing Mark asnd his teams to operate without their heavy hand.  Thus they could tell Mark that he must shut every booking office across the GWR (Great Western Railway) system (and that is a real threat) as they told GWR to get rid pof the through trains to Brighton (on the stupid premise that people didn't travel all the way to Great Malvern from Brighton). Coupled with telling SWR» (South Western Railway - about) that the Bristol to London through trains should be scrapped, the DfT (who clearly know little or nothing about transport) are simply as one RAIL magazine writer stated "timkering at the edges".  we know for a fact that 50 people had to be turned away from the GWR Brighton train whoich showed its popularity and it was significant that SWR managers (because they knew full well it would undermine the DfT's case chose not to reinstate the most popular early morning rain of the day from Bristol.  When there is an nexistential threat to hard working an much needed station staff it is little wonder the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) had such a resounding yes and I don't blame them at all.  It will be interesting to see whether the local MPs (Member of Parliament) pay lip service to the threat of staff redundancies in their patch and complain in the full knowledge that the cuts will go through or whether they are prepared to save their less than safe seats (for example that of Michelle Donelan) by actually doing something to stop the proposed cuts.  It would be ironic if staff cuts end in their own tenure as an MP being cut.  We shall see.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 39912



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #115 on: June 03, 2022, 11:56:05 am »

The key issue for me ....

Welcome to the Coffee Shop forum and your first post.   You are, I think personally, pretty accurate for the most part in the analysis - and if we all accept that, it leads to questions such as:

* Why are the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) being so heavy handed, and in the direction they are going?

* How can we as passengers, and passenger group / campaigners best help those who see things differently to the DfT  organisation's steer where we feel it is to the detriment of current and future public transport use
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4245


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #116 on: June 03, 2022, 05:57:22 pm »

RDG(resolve), NR» (Network Rail - home page) and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have all confirmed that the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) balloted for strike action/action short of a strike without engaging in meaningful discussions first.

Makes it sound like the RMT weren't interested in meaningful discussions, doesn't it?  However, Nigel Harris, editor of RAIL magazine, says in a very good latest editorial that the DfT only gave Network Rail permission to start formal discussions with the unions less than a week before the RMT ballot result was in.

Why weren't they given permission earlier I wonder?

Anyway, now discussions are ongoing, hopefully a resolution can be found that avoids widespread strikes.

Absolutely correct, NR Exc started talks with the Unions several months ago but there were no firm proposals put before the Unions by the Exc, the phase was 'we are just looking at ideas and want staff involvement' it was this approach ie no firm proposals that got the Unions and their members backs up.  There are normally good but robust relations between NR Exc and the Unions

Do you have a citation/source for that?

It'd certainly help the RMT's case if verified.

The RMT and the other Unions know this they do not need a citation as the Excu teams negotiating position has been stated to them and appears in internal comms
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1327


View Profile Email
« Reply #117 on: June 03, 2022, 06:29:47 pm »

The key issue for me (and I suspect if the truth is known  Mark Hopwood and his teams) is the current stranglehold on GWER services that the ..................


Again, unless something can be confirmed in print, it's the union at fault, and they should totally accept whatever pay and conditions are given (offered!) without question. Well, OK, perhaps say "We don't like what's on offer, and it is a pay cut, with having to work more hours as well. But we won't strike, and accept it this time without further problems".

Why is it always the unions fault?  Nothing to do with the members who it seems, are so brainwashed/right wing, that they will do anything they are told by the branch secretary.

Everyone has a view of who is right and who is therefore wrong.
Like politics really.

Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
DaveHarries
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 250



View Profile
« Reply #118 on: June 03, 2022, 07:27:34 pm »

ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about) rejected 4.2% from Scotrail yesterday.
SOunds high enough to me: how much are they holding out for?

Dave
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4397


View Profile
« Reply #119 on: June 03, 2022, 08:35:23 pm »

Again, unless something can be confirmed in print, it's the union at fault,

Why?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page