Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 28 Mar 2024
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
- Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
06:50 Westbury to Weymouth
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:19:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[117] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[80] Return of the BRUTE?
[63] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[27] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: All quiet, campaign fatigue, or is rail becoming irrelevant?  (Read 5598 times)
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 749


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 02, 2022, 20:40:45 »

I haven't travelled on the services of a franchised operator for over two years and the TOCs (Train Operating Company) have not been doing much to achieve that valued commodity "goodwill". Some recent journeys have been made by car whereas I would previously have used rail.

However, I've had cause to buy some tickets today. What a rigmarole... (I will describe on the appropriate thread).
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 02, 2022, 22:28:54 »

I guess that means BBQs rather than braziers on the picket lines? (especially on Sundays, if that day is included in the picketing week?)  Sad
Coming up from the Underground into St Pancras station this morning I was greeted by one heck of a din banging of drums and what I suspect were cowbells. Thought to myself it must be XR (Crossrail) or another environmental group only to find it was the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers)!

Perhaps there is some truth in the RMT replicating some of XR’s tactics and ways of protest.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: May 03, 2022, 11:13:33 »

If the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) and XR (Crossrail) are to work together, then I suggest that the RMT accept the following.
Any braziers on picket lines to burn waste wood, NOT COAL.
Barbecues to burn only eco charcoal, complete with multiple green ticks.
RMT officials to walk or cycle when reasonable, and use electric cars otherwise.

XR in turn should accept the following.
That they should assist (passively) at RMT pickets and demos.
XR to understand that trains can be made greener, in some yet to defined way, by having an extra union member on each train.
Not targeting trains, underground or otherwise, if driven by RMT members. (except by prior agreement when the overtime payment will be welcomed)
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: May 03, 2022, 11:51:25 »

In terms of the initial question posed in this thread, some of the comments on this forum seem to be getting dafter by the day.  It increasing seems not to be a place for sensible debate.  Part of the reason for less activity?

No wonder several of the members that work in the industry post less frequently or have stopped completely in the last year or two.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #19 on: May 03, 2022, 18:40:08 »

In terms of the initial question posed in this thread, some of the comments on this forum seem to be getting dafter by the day.  It increasing seems not to be a place for sensible debate.  Part of the reason for less activity?

No wonder several of the members that work in the industry post less frequently or have stopped completely in the last year or two.


There may very well be a grain of truth in that, but "the whole" is complex.   

The last year or two has "gifted" us the challenges of Covid and that has, perhaps, contributed to the lack of meat in discussions and some of the frivolity.  It has also brought a challenging new environment which feels like it has pushed us back from partnership with the rail industry to campaigning. I am personally at my wits end as I try and partner to promote a service which for all three of the last three weekends has failed (on the day) to deliver day trip opportunities from Melksham to Weymouth and in this awful (sorry, it is!) environment rail professionals are pitted against members of the public - not conducive to posting / helping.  Seeing the same thing in social media on buses where drivers are very much at the forefront of anger.

But that brings up a further historic metric too.  We have had, and retain, some wonderfully helpful friends both posting here and helping us understand where to look for emerging news and what it means.  Part of the reason some of these people have chosen their particular job is because they can get on with it, without needing to be an unexpected teacher of the uninitiated (and irrationally angry) ... and sadly a couple of these professional who have posted here have been put off by as little as one other member; understandable yet heartbreaking for the moderator team and a cause for much soul searching and analysis afterwards when it happens. To all professional readers, posters, people who keep us informed - thank you, we value you more than perhaps we say at times.   We continue to be a passenger forum, mind you - and we (as moderators / admins) will always look to help defuse and move on from such incidents, deflecting and explaining ourselves in those very, very rare cases of things blowing.

Adding further - with Covid and it's effects and following decisions "on high", it's all been pressure - and continues to be on rail professionals who (widely) seem to have even less time now for the "softer" activities of passenger and user group interaction, consultation and the like.  There are some excellent elements still around, but there are far less, end there are extra hoops where they are no longer allowed to do something without signoff on high, or even on very high.

I started with "a grain of truth". There are other things too.  The social media explosion of the last 10 years, and the movement on to smart phones, has moved many people on - "we have 'competition' we didn't have a decade ago". The removal of many of the more interesting services and simplifications may have cut the number of things to talk about too.  The aspects of this are on our radar ...

[Stopping there ... headed off to help the police ... mind on other things ... but I am fine / AOK]

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: May 03, 2022, 19:12:32 »

It has also brought a challenging new environment which feels like it has pushed us back from partnership with the rail industry to campaigning. I am personally at my wits end as I try and partner to promote a service which for all three of the last three weekends has failed (on the day) to deliver day trip opportunities from Melksham to Weymouth

.....
Adding further - with Covid and it's effects and following decisions "on high", it's all been pressure - and continues to be on rail professionals who (widely) seem to have even less time now for the "softer" activities of passenger and user group interaction, consultation and the like.  There are some excellent elements still around, but there are far less, end there are extra hoops where they are no longer allowed to do something without signoff on high, or even on very high.

It is hard on both sides - but the blame must fall on the DfT» (Department for Transport - about). The TOCs (Train Operating Company) aren't being paid to chat/discuss/plan with their passenger partners as there's no monetary gain any more, the TOCs simply being paid a fixed sum to run specified services. So of course their time is expended on different priorities these days. Their hands are very firmly tied by a budget handed don from their paymasters - and if it isn't specified in the budget there's no money in it, how ever much they'd like to help out & see the wisdom in the suggestion. There are pots of money, but very tightly specified and no longer sitting with the TOCs directly - but biddable by them (In a very few cases - Access for All being one) - and bodies like Comminity Rail who have at least 4 other pots for good works in their areas.

Work up a scheme in your local area's community rail region & work with them to bid on your project would seem a way forward, but that isn't likely to include providing additional long-distance services, more likely on stations and local services. Additional, Longer, more strategic services are probably on a hold until GBR (Great British Railways) can get their teeth into the rail system as a whole. Whether they will deem stakeholder involvement (rather than TOC involvement) a worthy way to sperd time & resource is still unknown.

Unfortunately, the days of partnering with TOCs to improve services has disappeared. A lot more money is required (almost to a point where the vast majority of funds need to be made) to partner with NR» (Network Rail - home page) & eventually with GBR if improvements are now to be made, IMHO (in my humble opinion)
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9809



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: May 03, 2022, 19:17:47 »

This RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers)/XR (Crossrail) debate could get confusing.  XR is the TOC (Train Operating Company) code for TfL» (Transport for London - about) Rail/Crossrail/Elizabeth Line!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #22 on: May 04, 2022, 06:36:42 »

Work up a scheme in your local area's community rail region & work with them to bid on your project would seem a way forward, but that isn't likely to include providing additional long-distance services, more likely on stations and local services. Additional, Longer, more strategic services are probably on a hold until GBR (Great British Railways) can get their teeth into the rail system as a whole. Whether they will deem stakeholder involvement (rather than TOC (Train Operating Company) involvement) a worthy way to spend time & resource is still unknown.

Unfortunately, the days of partnering with TOCs to improve services has disappeared. ....

I'm not entirely sure on the longer distance stuff, Chris, and feel that now is not the time to relax. Whilst we (Bradford on Avon and Trowbridge) lost our London service in December, and lose our Brighton service this month, I note that Middlebrough has gained through services to London, and there may be other examples of loses and gains too.   But certainly the decisions behind these service changes has shifted and is now far less about the business case and far more about the political one.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #23 on: May 04, 2022, 11:58:13 »

I do agree that the long-distance operators being run by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) do seem to have a tad more freedom in trialling new services - perhaps because they are already controlled directly & without contract.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: May 09, 2022, 10:03:41 »


I suspect that the majority of the general public, rather than the likes of us, won’t “enquire,” they vote with their feet

If the railways wanted to lose trade, this would be by a very good way to go about it

Increasing fares whilst not calling a fares increase a fares increase is hardly likely to increase repeat business. People will see through this newspeak quite easily and the media would have a field day with it, thereby reducing new passenger numbers still further.

Another good way to lose trade is to have frequent short-notice cancellations. There is a thread running at the moment about the south-west bound semi-fasts being chopped due to staff shortages but there is another example far closer to home that affects Graham much more than me. That is the level of cancellations on the Westbury to Swindon service, which has often found an entire crew shift’s worth of trains cancelled. It is starting to amaze me that there are still people using Melksham station at all.

Trains booked as 9 or 10 car running with 5; what passes for a catering service cancelled because nobody can be found who has been trained to wheel a trolley backwards; the list of things that look like they are actually designed to push passenger numbers down is a long one.

Nobody in senior management seems in the slightest inclined to sort out these problems.

There are some on this forum who feel that the government is still as anti-rail as it was in Margaret Thatcher’s time. Personally I don’t believe they are right for a number if practical reasons including facts like building new roads has been seen as impractical for over 30 years, the existing road network struggles to cope with existing road traffic, and that the matter of climate change and pollution are not going to magically go away, and the government knows it. Nevertheless, apparently powerless senior railway management, possibly aided, abetted and/or instructed by the Treasury appear to be doing all they can to make these situations worse

Let’s be honest. If your local Sainsburys treated its customers with as much contempt as the railways are currently doing, the next time your cupboards were getting bare you’d be going to Asda or Morrison or Tesco for the next stock up



Careful now, or you will start to sound like me.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page