Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:55 04 Oct 2024
 
- Airlines look to cut time spent on the tarmac
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 11/10/24 - TWSW General Meeting
22/10/24 - BoA Public Transport talk
25/10/24 - Melksham Transport Group
27/11/24 - WWRUG, Trowbridge

On this day
4th Oct (1976)
HST - first public service (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
15:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Moreton-In-Marsh
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:23 London Paddington to Banbury
18:45 Exeter St Davids to Okehampton
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
19:05 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:31 Okehampton to Exeter Central
19:45 Banbury to London Paddington
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
21:41 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
23:40 Exeter St Davids to Exmouth
05/10/24 00:19 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
Short Run
10:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:09 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:08 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
16:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Delayed
14:23 Swansea to London Paddington
Additional 14:57 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
15:47 Plymouth to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Open to 24/10 03:05 Purely a light-hearted question, but who do you bet on?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
October 04, 2024, 16:06:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[106] 6. Catering
[71] Meet the Director, 3 October - an update
[44] Euston: a five point plan
[43] TODAY! Meet the Manager - on the forum and on Zoom
[41] vote for your favourite rail leaf cleaner
[41] New entrance, Bakerloo Line, Paddington. Opened October 2024
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Investigation after near miss at Farnborough crossing - May 2022  (Read 3030 times)
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 732


View Profile
« on: June 08, 2022, 07:32:34 »

Berkshire Live - Get Reading

"A Reading-bound train came within seconds of hitting a group of people crossing the railway line. The Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch)) has launched an investigation following the incident at a footpath crossing at Farnborough North railway station in Hampshire."
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18483


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2024, 18:13:50 »

VERY belatedly - with my apologies for my oversight - here is the report from the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) on that incident: https://www.gov.uk/raib-reports/report-04-slash-2023-near-miss-at-farnborough-north-footpath-level-crossing

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6442731122ef3b000c66f6d5/R042023_230424_Farnborough_North.pdf

Quote
Summary
At 08:20 hrs on Thursday 19 May 2022, 144 people were waiting on the east side of the railway to use the footpath level crossing at Farnborough North station. Pedestrian gates on each side of the crossing were locked until a train had departed from the station. The crossing users had arrived on this train and were mostly young people. They were regular users of the station and normally had to wait before crossing the railway to continue their journey to school or college. There is currently no footbridge or subway at this station.

After the train departed, miniature stop lights at the crossing changed from red to green and an audible warning stopped, indicating that it was safe to cross the railway. A crossing attendant, located in a cabin next to the crossing on the east side of the railway, responded by turning a switch to remotely unlock the pedestrian gates at both ends of the crossing. The person at the front of the queue opened the gate and the group started to cross the railway. Each person held the gate open for the person following them.

When around half the group had crossed, the miniature stop lights changed from green to red and the audible warning started, indicating that another train was approaching. The crossing attendant turned the switch to lock the gates, but crossing users continued to pass through the gate until the crossing attendant left their cabin and directly intervened to close it. The driver of a train approaching from around a bend in the track saw people on the crossing ahead and applied the train’s emergency brake and sounded the horn. The crossing was clear before the train passed over it.

Network Rail staff undertake regular inspections and risk assessments of level crossings on the national rail network. Farnborough North footpath crossing is considered a high-risk location because of the limited sighting of trains, the number of daily users and a history of safety incidents. In 2013, Network Rail installed additional ‘back-to-back’ miniature warning lights to help with user decision making. Network Rail subsequently provided a crossing attendant and lockable gates to manage the risk until it could permanently close the crossing and replace it with a footbridge.

RAIB’s investigation found, however, that Network Rail had not developed a plan or training which would enable the crossing attendant to effectively manage the residual risks that remained at the crossing following the installation of lockable gates. RAIB also found that the project to construct an accessible footbridge had not obtained planning approval over a prolonged period because of land ownership issues and the need to design a compliant structure which was suitable for the constrained site.

Recommendations
RAIB has made two recommendations to Network Rail regarding improvements in the risk assessment process for footpath level crossings where there is a history of safety incidents occurring, and formalising competency requirements for temporary and interim crossing attendants. RAIB has also identified one learning point for railway organisations which are reminded that complex projects, or those requiring engagement with external stakeholders over an extended period, require managerial continuity.

Response to recommendations:

RAIB will periodically update the status of recommendations as reported to us by the relevant safety authority or public body
RAIB may add comment, particularly if we have concerns regarding these responses.
RAIB Recommendation response for Farnborough North

Published 24 April 2023

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 380


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2024, 11:03:08 »

"the miniature stop lights changed from green to red and the audible warning started...but crossing users continued to pass through the gate".

Really no helping some people, is there? A bit like the drivers who weave round half barrier level crossings. Because the gate wasn't physically stopping them, being already open, they chose to cross despite apparently clear warnings; audible warnings like that would I suspect even cut through noise-cancelling headphones and I doubt everyone was wearing them so could have warned others.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page