Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:55 28 Mar 2024
* Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
14:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Delayed
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 17:06:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: New National Rail Contract for GWR - starting 26th June 2022  (Read 7411 times)
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 14, 2022, 21:28:04 »

Quote
And I suspect "a comprehensive review of its diesel fleet" is code for "a one-way HST (High Speed Train) excursion to Booths" but time will tell...

Yes, I think that “comprehensive review” of the diesel fleet has already taken place with a trip to Newport or Rotherham on the agenda for the Castle Class HSTs.

My one wish, after what must be 15-16 years of First running the entire GW (Great Western) network, that they would finally sort out having enough crew at weekends to run the full timetable. Ridiculous that after all this time of First running the GW network, most if not all weekends still have cancellations due to shortage of traincrew.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2022, 04:51:17 »

If any new rolling stock is being considered to replace the short HSTs (High Speed Train) in use at present, hopefully lessons will be learnt from the failed IET (Intercity Express Train) project.
Make certain that the new units are ALL delivered before scrapping the old stock.
Do not scrap the old stock until the new units have run with good reliability for at least 12 months.
Ensure that the new units are not too big a backward step in comfort and facilities.

I see no merit in replacing existing stock with new all diesel units. So that means in effect
100% battery power.
Diesel/battery hybrid.
Diesel/battery/25 kv hybrid.

Make certain that they work, even at Dawlish, and in other adverse conditions. Avoid anything too innovative.

Make certain that luggage and cycle space is sufficient for use in areas popular with holidaymakers.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 15, 2022, 05:49:49 »

Can we stop calling it a contract 'extension' please? It's a completely different, new *management*contract.

Legally and technically, you are correct, to most it will appear as an extension.  Either way it is good news for the employees and passengers or in modern parlance team members and customers

If any new rolling stock is being considered to replace the short HSTs (High Speed Train) in use at present, hopefully lessons will be learnt from the failed IET (Intercity Express Train) project.
Make certain that the new units are ALL delivered before scrapping the old stock.
Do not scrap the old stock until the new units have run with good reliability for at least 12 months.
Ensure that the new units are not too big a backward step in comfort and facilities.

I see no merit in replacing existing stock with new all diesel units. So that means in effect
100% battery power.
Diesel/battery hybrid.
Diesel/battery/25 kv hybrid.

Make certain that they work, even at Dawlish, and in other adverse conditions. Avoid anything too innovative.

Make certain that luggage and cycle space is sufficient for use in areas popular with holidaymakers.


Given the recent announcement that GWR (Great Western Railway) are looking for additional EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) for its fleet my guess is the 'Castles' will be replaced with 5 car 800's
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2022, 08:00:41 »

Given the recent announcement that GWR (Great Western Railway) are looking for additional EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) for its fleet my guess is the 'Castles' will be replaced with 5 car 800's

Will that require servicing of 800's somewhere west of Stoke Gifford?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: June 15, 2022, 08:06:54 »

If the Castles are to be replaced by 5 car IETs (Intercity Express Train), then what about main line services ?

It seems that insufficient IETs are available to run the present services, about a dozen half length services today for example.
How is an already often inadequate fleet to cope if several units are to be used elsewhere ?
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #20 on: June 15, 2022, 08:15:30 »

Given the recent announcement that GWR (Great Western Railway) are looking for additional EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) for its fleet my guess is the 'Castles' will be replaced with 5 car 800's

Will that require servicing of 800's somewhere west of Stoke Gifford?

Is there not already some servicing at Long Rock and at Maliphant?

If the Castles are to be replaced by 5 car IETs (Intercity Express Train), then what about main line services ?

It seems that insufficient IETs are available to run the present services, about a dozen half length services today for example.
How is an already often inadequate fleet to cope if several units are to be used elsewhere ?

Yes, but the 769s will be in service by Christmas (just not telling you which Christmas) and there should be units spare from not running the superfasts that many 5 car units were built for, and more by turning the Bedwyn service into a shuttle from Newbury, or using 769s and replacing the London destination of London (Paddington) with London (Gatwick). If that does not give you enough IETs on a daily basis to meet the timetable requirements, change the timetable to schedule some more trains as 5 cars in the first place.

That comment written to mix the sensible, the pragmatic, and the "don't be silly" - interesting question is to sort out which is which.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: June 16, 2022, 08:57:45 »

If the Castles are to be replaced by 5 car IETs (Intercity Express Train), then what about main line services ?

It seems that insufficient IETs are available to run the present services, about a dozen half length services today for example.
How is an already often inadequate fleet to cope if several units are to be used elsewhere ?

In the medium term some of the Cardiff / Padd stopping services could be replaces with 110mph (387) EMU (Electric Multiple Unit)'s the timings would not be far behind that of a class 800.  If the wires go up to Oxford then all the Oxford fasts could be replaced with 387's (or equivalent 110mph EMU)
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 09, 2022, 15:02:52 »

A copy of the current GWR (Great Western Railway) contract has now appeared in DfT» (Department for Transport - about)'s public register of rail passenger contracts. Plenty to read there!

The main thing picked up so far is what Chapter 4.3 "The Rolling Stock" says about the 769s. That's in Appendix 1 (p 81), where there are two tables. The 769s appear on the first: Original Rolling Stock - with a lease expiry date of 1st April 2023 -  but not in the second: Specified Additional Rolling Stock.

But those tables are difficult to interpret. Apart from the 80x fleet, all items are shown as additional stock leased from their own original expiry date. But the columns that would show that replacement are not filled in. It really isn't clear what the finer points of this table mean - such as an omission.

This is, of course, a contract written by lawyers, and making obvious sense is not the top priority in its layout or wording. If you want proof of that, look at the note above the table explaining what an early redelivery date is (there's a column for those - it's empty):
Quote
Explanatory Note A: Where in Column 6 both a scheduled lease expiry date and an early redelivery date are specified in relation to one or more specified units (each being a “Specified Unit”) the lease expiry date for the Specified Units shall be the early redelivery date provided that where any unit shown in Table 2 or Table 3 below as replacing any Specified Unit from the early delivery date is delivered after the early redelivery date such Specified Unit shall remain in the Train Fleet until the relevant scheduled lease expiry date or such earlier date as the Secretary of State may agree.

The other important factor is that the whole contract is a bit of a farce anyway, as it can be altered (and they usually are); and it confers almost no rights on GWR/First since everything important is at the SoS's discretion. So if, at the time of making the contract, no-one was sure what would happen with the 769s, maybe they just decided to leave that bit out. There were (and still are) a few months to see what does happen and for talks among various parties to try and find a solution.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 09, 2022, 18:10:19 »

I think it simply means that if a replacement unit is not ready to be put into service when the unit to be replaced is due to be returned, you can keep the original unit until the replacement unit is ready - unless the Secretary of State agrees to an earlier release of the unit to be replaced.

As there seems to be no replacement units in Table 2, which seems to list some further leases for current stock when the current ones expire (and no Table 3) this seems to be a note that does not apply, presumably because it's in DfT» (Department for Transport - about)'s standard document template and was not deleted as this template was edited for the GW (Great Western) agreement.

What is perhaps a little surprising (although I have not gone through all 583 pages to find the answer!) is that there seem to be no further leases agreed for the class 387/1s when the current leases expire on 1 April next year.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 09, 2022, 21:27:28 »

What is perhaps a little surprising (although I have not gone through all 583 pages to find the answer!) is that there seem to be no further leases agreed for the class 387/1s when the current leases expire on 1 April next year.

There's an ITT (Invitation to Tender) out for that requirement (it's on the forum somewhere) - which explains the wording in the table.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: December 10, 2022, 23:32:51 »

There's an ITT (Invitation to Tender) out for that requirement (it's on the forum somewhere) - which explains the wording in the table.

Or maybe it isn't, at least I can't find it. So, for the record, this - in what always looked like a benchmarking exercise demanded by DfT» (Department for Transport - about) - was the core of the tender notice:
Quote
Type         Contract (Supply)
Duration    6 year
Value         ___
Published   31 May 2022
Delivery     01 Aug 2022 to 29 May 2028
Deadline    30 Jun 2022 00:00

Description

Great Western Railway (GWR (Great Western Railway)) is seeking expressions of interest from suppliers for provision of a fleet of 30 x 4-car electric multiple units (EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit)) to deliver existing London Thames Valley services, to the current sectional running times (SRTs), with at least the same seated and crush laden capacity, from the 1st of April 2023 to the 29th May 2028.
Total Quantity or Scope

Provision of a fleet of 30 x 4-car electric multiple units (EMUs) to deliver existing London Thames Valley services, to the current sectional running times (SRTs), with at least the same seated and crush laden capacity, from the 1st of April 2023 to the 29th May 2028.

The EMUs must be capable of being powered by 25kV overhead lines, be capable and approved for use at speeds of up to 110mph prior to entering service, and operating in multiples, with a through gangway, of up to three units.

Our current fleet is maintained in house at Reading Depot, supported by a TSSSA. It is our intention that maintenance provision continues in this manner.

It's been reported that the result is most of the 387 fleet (30 of 33 units) is staying.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: December 15, 2022, 17:28:19 »

The main thing picked up so far is what Chapter 4.3 "The Rolling Stock" says about the 769s. That's in Appendix 1 (p 81), where there are two tables. The 769s appear on the first: Original Rolling Stock - with a lease expiry date of 1st April 2023 -  but not in the second: Specified Additional Rolling Stock.

Maybe they (DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and GWR (Great Western Railway)) really were giving the 769s one last chance in June, or maybe they had already given up on them. Either way that has now become a plan.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page