From the three criteria listed it is evident that none of the recent Secretaries of State or Junior Ministers would qualify as DfT» employees on account of their restricted and narrow view of investment, their ineffective decision making and dilatory working.
Hmmm
OTC
I am not going to dispute the personal matters of ministerial qualifications, but isn't one of the points of employing a specialist being to widen the skills and knowledge base in the organisation for its greater good? So that (in this case) ministers who have decisions to make can be more certain that they are informed on things that are uncertain and make better judgement as to what risks they should take?
I would, perhaps, have been up for a role like this is the past - sounds fun - but these days I'm uncertain if I could commit to 40% of my world time in London, or Leeds, or Lampeter, or Liverpool. And of course in the Civil Service it's so much about qualifications (that I lack) that opportunities for a few motivated free thinkers in key roles just aren't there.
(Just in case any civil servants at the DfT are reading this - there are some excellent people there; I have been very impressed by some of you - however, it would be good to be more inclusive of wider thought and not just the formally educated channel)