Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
I need help
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 01:35 08 Feb 2023
- Trial of scrapping train return tickets extended
- Warning hundreds of England bus services face cuts
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 01/03/23 - WWRUG AGM
30/03/23 - Railfuture Annual, Leeds
31/05/23 - WWRUG meeting
08/07/23 - WWRUG Weymouth trip

On this day
8th Feb (1853)
Swansea to Carmarthen doubled (link)

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
February 08, 2023, 01:51:17 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[148] Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
[102] Return rail tickets to be scrapped
[90] Reform of ticketing – not just a moan, but some suggestions ...
[33] OTD -5th February (1971) - Taunton to Minehead foundation meet...
[31] What no trains ............. ever
[28] Problems with IET trains from April 2021
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trial of new revenue protection technology  (Read 327 times)
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
Posts: 2005

From station to station, back to Bristol city....

View Profile
« on: December 03, 2022, 05:07:58 pm »

There's a brief report here of a new technology trial aimed a detecting fare dodgers.  Perhaps understandably, it doesn't reveal too much about how it works.|social|metroukfacebook
Hero Member
Posts: 633

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2022, 11:36:10 am »

Ticket gates can already be set for railcard blocks etc. not sure what is added beyond that. I think the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) are doing the rounds with various TOCs (Train Operating Company) for these ticketless travel surveys.
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
Posts: 11487

View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2022, 12:40:58 pm »

From the report, it is ibvious that many have found a route around the barriers, hence the number of ticketless travellers picked up. The report is designed NOT to privide any further info of course, so people keep wondering
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
Posts: 6625

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2022, 06:17:53 pm »

It seems to be doing what most people think barriers do already - reading the data off the mag stripe and flagging invalid tickets. It can hardly read more data that way; there's only so much there. It might be trying to read what's printed, which should be feasible these days, but I don't think it does.

Mainly, it's showing a clearer and more useful explanation of the refusal for staff to use. Current barriers don't do very well at this, and staff don't always know enough to make sense of the error codes (if they even see them). Where limitations of current barriers, data not coded at all, and other factors lead to simplified refusal rules that catch valid tickets, then this might provide a back-up to let them through. However, that may not be management's priority in using the new readers.
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
Posts: 234

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2022, 11:03:49 pm »

The article couldn't really have explained it much less clearly! Someone obviously wanted to put out a press release about a new bit of kit which is probably used once a gate rejects a ticket, but was so worried about giving away any details that it ended up meaningless, and they have inevitably glossed over why there wasn't already anything similar if it's so useful.  I agree that it's likely to give more details than the basic numeric reject code shown by the gate, though some of that can of course be done just by reading what is printed on a physical ticket and applying the rules (but see anecdotal complaints about off-peak tickets and gateline staff at Paddington).  Staff anywhere that accepts tickets on smartcards are already meant to have devices that can read them in great detail, otherwise you're left looking at a piece of plastic.

I used what I suspect was this device's predecessor back in the 90s.  It was handy for instance if someone was trying to reuse a ticket which a later gate then correctly rejected. The passenger would deny everything and claim there must be a problem with the gate and with no detail to go on staff had to give them the benefit of the doubt.  Read off exactly when and where they'd previously been and suddenly they would remember the journey that must have slipped their mind. Equally you could sometimes confirm that a mistake had been made such as accidentally using the wrong half of a return ticket and be lenient.
Surrey 455
Hero Member
Posts: 1194

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2022, 12:07:39 am »

Staff anywhere that accepts tickets on smartcards are already meant to have devices that can read them in great detail, otherwise you're left looking at a piece of plastic.
Which is how I get through the barriers at Epsom. SWR» (South Western Railway - about) smartcards should be able to be read at this Southern station but are rejected. The barrier staff know this so I show them my smartcard to get through. They have never read it electronically though. Oddly, the barriers at nearby Leatherhead, another Southern station will read my smartcard.

In early 2019 SWR confirmed to me that taking a break of journey using my season ticket at Epsom was valid and that "interoperability" would take place later that year meaning that I should then have no further problems.

Almost four years later, nothings happened and my smartcard still gets rejected.  Sad
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page