Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 01:15 03 Dec 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 07/12/24 - Christmas Lights MTUG
15/12/24 - New Timetable Starts
19/12/24 - MTUG Committee Plus meeting
25/12/24 - Westbury Station Closure

On this day
3rd Dec (1984)
Bhopal gas leak (link)

Train RunningCancelled
03/12/24 00:55 Guildford to Reading
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 03, 2024, 01:24:21 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[123] Northumberland Line to open on Sun 15 December
[58] AQ02 - you'll know the name but can you place the face?
[53] Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway - ongoing dis...
[53] Tiger has indigestion - use lion, puma or cheetah instead!
[49] Cyclists - death toll on our roads
[43] RAF Lancaster bombers - merged posts
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 29
  Print  
Author Topic: 2023 Delays and Cancellations  (Read 69157 times)
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1989


View Profile
« Reply #300 on: November 07, 2023, 08:36:48 »

Quote
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington due 08:24 will be diverted between Worcester Shrub Hill and Reading.
It will no longer call at Worcestershire Parkway Hl, Pershore, Evesham, Honeybourne, Moreton-In-Marsh, Kingham, Charlbury, Hanborough and Oxford.
It has been delayed at Hereford and is now 54 minutes late.
This is due to a broken down train.
Last Updated:07/11/2023 06:27

07:01 Worcester Shrub Hill to Didcot Parkway due 08:45 has been delayed at Worcester Shrub Hill and is now 22 minutes late.
This is due to this train being late from the depot.
Last Updated:07/11/2023 08:14

No mention of 1P16 06:43 Shrub Hill - Paddington, held for 17 minutes at Norton Junction for westbound departmental train 3S31, running 23 late.
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1989


View Profile
« Reply #301 on: November 08, 2023, 09:49:59 »

Quote
06:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern due 09:29 will be terminated at Worcester Foregate Street.
It will no longer call at Malvern Link and Great Malvern.
This is due to congestion.
Last Updated:08/11/2023 08:30

09:54 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 12:22 will be started from Worcester Foregate Street.
It will no longer call at Great Malvern and Malvern Link.
This is due to congestion.
Last Updated:08/11/2023 08:31

1P16 0643 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington departed Shrub Hill 15 late and was 21 late by Charlbury and 26 late into Paddington.
In consequence, 1W13 0650 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street was held at Wolvercote. 18 late at Charlbury and into Shrub Hill. It has a scheduled wait at Shrub Hill, so was only 7 late into Foregate Street.
The halts train, 2E80 0701 Worcester Shrub Hill to Didcot Parkway, was held at Charlbury and reached Oxford 20 late.
And behind that, train 1P18 0713 Great Malvern to London Paddington was also held at Charlbury and reached Oxford 16 late.
Logged
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 666



View Profile
« Reply #302 on: November 08, 2023, 10:46:23 »

I don't imagine there's any chance of anything being done about the remaining single-line sections, at either end of the Wolvercote Junction to Norton Junction railway, but they really do need fixing.  One out-of-course train can still wreak as much havoc as it would have done in the days before the 2011 re-doubling of part of the line
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1250


View Profile Email
« Reply #303 on: November 08, 2023, 12:33:48 »

The North Cotswold Line Task Force proposals envisage shortening the single line at each end - basically redoubling Wolvercot to Hanborough, and Evesham to Pershore. (I have my doubts that it'll happen.)
Logged
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 666



View Profile
« Reply #304 on: November 08, 2023, 12:56:53 »

In terms of helping with regulation of trains, I'd think a short section of double line - wouldn't need to be much more that a train length - at both Wolvercot and Norton Junctions could be very useful, particularly if the junctions were doubled, too.  Meaning trains waiting for a path onto the single lines wouldn't have to stand in the way of trains heading towards Banbury from Oxford or towards Abbotswood from Worcester.

I suspect there's no money for this (even though it would have such benefits), any more than there's money to add any substantial distance to to the double-track milage that already exists
Logged
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1745


View Profile
« Reply #305 on: November 08, 2023, 14:30:39 »

it's surprising that that's not been standard practice on single line junctions with double track from the off. Perhaps it was that at the first, it wasn't envisaged that there'd be the density of traffic and the thinking didn't evolve. Though that hardly excuses locations where lines have been singled.

Mark
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42737



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #306 on: November 08, 2023, 16:39:58 »

it's surprising that that's not been standard practice on single line junctions with double track from the off. Perhaps it was that at the first, it wasn't envisaged that there'd be the density of traffic and the thinking didn't evolve. Though that hardly excuses locations where lines have been singled.

Mark

Thinking about this from the time at which lines were singled - taking Thingley Junction as an example.

a) A crossover and single turnout has allowed the main line to be canted and so have its line speed raised

b) The line was run with a single line token.  If a trains could pass onto a short section of double track clear of the junction, there would need to be a way to get the token to the driver

c) With just a handful of trains a week down the single line, go for the cheapest option to install and maintain

d) A crossover then a single point to the branch provides for reversal of a train on the main line which a double junction would not
« Last Edit: November 08, 2023, 17:08:46 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 666



View Profile
« Reply #307 on: November 09, 2023, 09:55:31 »



b) The line was run with a single line token.  If a trains could pass onto a short section of double track clear of the junction, there would need to be a way to get the token to the driver


It would need an auxiliary token instrument to be provided in a small hut in a convenient place for the driver to withdraw a token in cooperation with the signallers at each end of the section.  In fact, I think there was one at Thingley Jcn in the days of Bradford Junctions 'box working the single line with Swindon Panel
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12916


View Profile Email
« Reply #308 on: November 09, 2023, 10:08:14 »

Meaning trains waiting for a path onto the single lines wouldn't have to stand in the way of trains heading towards Banbury from Oxford

The down relief is used for that purpose north of Oxford, such that trains heading north of Wolvercot use the Down Main to get past.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42737



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #309 on: November 09, 2023, 10:28:27 »



b) The line was run with a single line token.  If a trains could pass onto a short section of double track clear of the junction, there would need to be a way to get the token to the driver


It would need an auxiliary token instrument to be provided in a small hut in a convenient place for the driver to withdraw a token in cooperation with the signallers at each end of the section.  In fact, I think there was one at Thingley Jcn in the days of Bradford Junctions 'box working the single line with Swindon Panel

There might have been one there - though I have seen a video of a token being collected on the platform at Chippenham Station (in addition?)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 666



View Profile
« Reply #310 on: November 09, 2023, 11:49:24 »

I remember visiting Bradford Junctions box and giving the release for a token to be taken at the Swindon end of the single line.  What a great 'box to work!  And they couldn't get rid of it when they wanted to with the Westbury resignalling in 1985 - Westbury panel couldn't work to Swindon, Swindon couldn't work to Bristol at Bradford Jcn.  So until they worked out a way of knitting it all together, the box stayed.  An oasis.

Logged
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 666



View Profile
« Reply #311 on: November 09, 2023, 12:18:39 »

Quote
11:52 London Paddington to Hereford due 14:41 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.

Last Updated:09/11/2023 11:15

and, correspondingly:

Quote
15:18 Hereford to London Paddington due 18:29 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time. GWR (Great Western Railway) train was delayed or cancelled, you can claim Delay Repay compensation. Please keep your ticket and visit GWR.com/DelayRepay
Last Updated:09/11/2023 11:15

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42737



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #312 on: November 09, 2023, 12:28:21 »

I remember visiting Bradford Junctions box and giving the release for a token to be taken at the Swindon end of the single line.  What a great 'box to work!  And they couldn't get rid of it when they wanted to with the Westbury resignalling in 1985 - Westbury panel couldn't work to Swindon, Swindon couldn't work to Bristol at Bradford Jcn.  So until they worked out a way of knitting it all together, the box stayed.  An oasis.

The found a way of doing in in 1990, very sadly by closing the north side of the triangle at Bradford Junction so that it's no longer possible for a train to work from Melksham to Bath without reversing or making an extraordiarily long diversion (work it out  Grin )

P.S. We may be off topic here - though we are on the very edge of The Cotswolds ... I think Lacock IS in The Cotswolds and the singleton's lin passes through there ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1989


View Profile
« Reply #313 on: November 09, 2023, 16:47:43 »

Quote
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern due 18:26 has been cancelled.
This is due to this train being late from the depot.
Last Updated:09/11/2023 15:55

19:05 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 21:24 will be cancelled.
This is due to this train being late from the depot.
Last Updated:09/11/2023 15:56
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1250


View Profile Email
« Reply #314 on: November 09, 2023, 20:06:13 »

Quote
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern due 18:26 has been cancelled.
This is due to this train being late from the depot.
Last Updated:09/11/2023 15:55

Whole host of people crammed onto the 2-coach Oxfordshire Halts train (I went down to pick up Junior on his way back from school). Bit of a mess.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 29
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page