Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 03 Oct 2024
 
- Hidden runway bomb explodes just after plane takes off
- New allegations over surgeon convicted of rape
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Coffee Shop - Meet the Manager
11/10/24 - TWSW General Meeting
22/10/24 - BoA Public Transport talk
25/10/24 - Melksham Transport Group

On this day
3rd Oct (1971)
Teeside Airport station opens (link)

Train RunningCancelled
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
11:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
12:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
12:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Delayed
09:27 Carmarthen to London Paddington
10:42 Plymouth to Penzance
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
October 03, 2024, 11:47:26 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[168] New entrance, Bakerloo Line, Paddington. Opened October 2024
[138] New map promotes car-free travel in the Cotswolds
[92] Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway - ongoing dis...
[84] Paddle Steamer Waverley - merged posts
[61] [otd] 3rd October 1906 - Ashton Avenue Bridge opened
[46] Scope to increase Bristol suburban services?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29]
  Print  
Author Topic: 2023 Delays and Cancellations  (Read 64380 times)
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1911


View Profile
« Reply #420 on: December 21, 2023, 16:38:44 »

And more:
Quote
14:53 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street due 17:04 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Last Updated:21/12/2023 14:38

17:26 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington due 19:52 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Last Updated:21/12/2023 14:38
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10281


View Profile
« Reply #421 on: December 21, 2023, 16:50:43 »

Quote from: Worcester_Passenger
Keep up:
Quote
15:17 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington due 17:29 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Last Updated:21/12/2023 09:40

Well JourneyCheck couldn’t.  It was reinstated, but still showing as cancelled for a l-o-n-g time after!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1911


View Profile
« Reply #422 on: December 27, 2023, 12:42:26 »

JourneyCheck:
Quote
10:19 Reading to Hereford due 12:46 will be terminated at Great Malvern.
It will no longer call at Colwall, Ledbury and Hereford.
It has been delayed at Reading and is now 38 minutes late.
This is due to a late running train being in front of this one.
Last Updated:27/12/2023 11:48

13:18 Hereford to Reading due 15:59 will be started from Great Malvern.
It will no longer call at Hereford, Ledbury and Colwall.
This is due to a late running train being in front of this one.
Last Updated:27/12/2023 11:48

10:19 from Reading was held for the single line at Evesham and is now 61 late.

The "late running train in front of this one" looks to have been a late arrival at Reading by train 1P20, the 08:15 from Shrub Hill to Reading. This left Shrub Hill 28 late, was held at Norton and at Charlbury, and arrived at Reading 50 late. It left Shrub Hill late becaause the empty stock from Stoke Gifford arrived 34 late.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42008



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #423 on: January 03, 2024, 11:54:59 »

For 2024 - new topic at http://www.passenger.chat/28354 - please carry on there.  This thread remains open for archive and historical reference back.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7295


View Profile
« Reply #424 on: February 01, 2024, 14:51:42 »

The photograph in the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) announcement makes it look as if the wall is made up of two skins of brickwork, with little bonding between the two. You can see this more clearly in the RailAdvent piece.

The RAIB report into this incident has been published, and identifies the big gap between the original wing wall and this thin wall in front (added to it at some time) as important. Not only did it hide the load-bearing wall behind it, but it meant that the last repair (pins grouted into the wall in 2013) was ineffective. It also meant that, when this wall bulged, the one behind was bulging even more, and the state of the wall was misassessed.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12715


View Profile Email
« Reply #425 on: February 01, 2024, 15:58:44 »

Quote
The collapse happened within three weeks of an examining engineer observing that a bulge in the brickwork had increased since a previous inspection.

There is a process for an examiner to directly notify Network Rail if they identify something that requires urgent attention, but this was not thought to be the case in this instance, according to the report.
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1911


View Profile
« Reply #426 on: February 01, 2024, 18:14:18 »

OK, the big issue in the report is about the wing wall.

But given that there has been much discussion of late about emergency evacuation of trains, there's little mention of what actually happened here.

It's noticeable that the incident happened at 18:35, but that evacuation of the train didn't start until 22:15 and wasn't complete until 23:57. The train was "carrying 365 passengers plus 2 crew" (para 26).  Evacuation was "assisted by Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service" (para 31), who presumably set up lighting and ladders to move the passengers to the rescue train.

I'm assuming that during this time the driver would be mainly concerned with the train.  The conductor must have done a sterling job in keeping everybody calm and well-informed. And on their own - "2 crew" implies no trolley and no First Class host.  Perhaps there were Hanborough passengers on board who said "we're out in the middle of nowhere - let's just stay on this nice safe train".  We're not told when the fire service arrived - but I'd imagine that if they appeared inside the train then that must have been helpful.

And the evacuation took over an hour and a half - worth remembering that.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12715


View Profile Email
« Reply #427 on: February 01, 2024, 19:21:29 »

The RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) would have only been concerned with this if there had been a safety aspect - but as the train was probably the safest place for stranded passengers, they found nothing to investigate.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page