So that's a 37 minute gap from Swindon. It does not address the un-evenness - quite the reveres as far as I can see, as previously the maximum gap was 29 minutes (reading GWR▸ 's diagrams). Could it be that this change is also going to make money saving through split tickets less convenient?
The number of customers from Swindon actually wanting to alight at Didcot isn't many in the scheme of things - many of those want to change: either onto Oxford services or the
RDG‡ stoppers - so are likely to use the two services an hour that 'connect' with the shuttles and/or stoppers to RDG.
The fourth service at Didcot in each hour will be a Paddington to Oxford service and a North Cotswold to Paddington service. This service will replace the turbo shuttle between Didcot and Oxford
.
So one
IET▸ is replacing the two turbo shuttles? Is that what you mean? A reduction (not replacement) in service between
DID» and
OXF» will affect far more passengers that your
SWI» /OXF changes. Please confirm or clarify.
I suspect (can someone confirm) that this will save a train (GWR talk of "rationalising" the service.
I can understand the want to get as many turbos to the south west as possible with the Castles disappearing, but this change if confirmed is to much.
How good is the timekeeping of the train coming off the North Cotswold line? It's planned to go forward at xx:44 from Didcot to Paddington, in the middle of the 37 minute gap, but will this be robust? Are North Cotswold delays going to percolate?
The
GWML▸ copes agt the moment with the North Cots timekeeping - I don't see why it shouldn't still frankly. What's changing to make it any worse?