Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 27 Feb 2024
- Plane aborts Heathrow landing due to strong winds
- Reading-London Paddington route set for overhaul
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 08/03/24 - FoSBR Bristol Rail Campaign AG
09/03/24 - The Cwm and Glo
20/03/24 - WWRUG AGM
23/03/24 - Trains restart - Minehead

On this day
27th Feb (1942)
1st transport of French Jews to Nazi Germany (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
09:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:00 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
07:23 Carmarthen to London Paddington
07:46 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
09:27 Carmarthen to London Paddington
09:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
Delayed
08:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:50 Plymouth to St Austell
11:08 St Austell to Plymouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
February 27, 2024, 09:52:56 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[127] Growth by 2050
[126] Network Rail plan to close Tan Hill crossing and replace it wi...
[69] GWR IETs Issue
[65] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
[56] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[44] £140 million plan to address Paddington - Reading shambles
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Delay repay reduction  (Read 4194 times)
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 853



View Profile
« on: November 01, 2023, 14:14:25 »

I recently submitted a delay repay claim for a 1 hour (60 min !) delay. My intended train from Romsey to Warminster was cancelled - I had to wait an extra one hour for the next train on this hourly service route. I cannot recommend Romsey station on a cold, dark & windy night.  According to my wristwatch, the second train arrived at my destination on time.

My claim was rejected and I was awarded 30 mins compensation. I appealed and asked for the reason why my claim was rejected. My appeal has been summarily rejected - "We have reviewed the information available to us and have upheld the original decision made".
My entirely reasonable request for an explanation has been ignored - all too common in modern day "customer service" departments. Are they too embarrassed to tell me that my second train actually arrived (according to GWR (Great Western Railway) timing) a few seconds early at Warminster ? Or is a GWR hour only 59 minutes long ?

Just to add icing to the cake, the second train was 6 coaches long - announcements were made as to where to stand with your dog, horse, for 1st Class, etc. When it arrived, the rear 3 coaches were locked out of use - the remaining 3, with 2 loads of people therein, were "cosy". Yes, I can probably offer a reasonable explanation for this, but most of the people on this train were undoubtedly just accepting this as an all too common happening on the appalling service offered on this route nowadays. And ................the locked out part of the train was three refurbished coaches - the three that we were allowed to use looked tired and worn out............just like the passengers !
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18874



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2023, 14:21:06 »

My suggestion is follow up complaint to Customer Services via email, pointing out the hour delay at Romsey and the subsequent poor experience due to the following short formed service. It’s mean in the extreme to deny the 60 minutes Delay Repay just because the following train hit a timing point a few seconds early.
Logged

"The dispicable rip off of the last 30 years has truly been nothing but a great train robbery." - Ben Elton

Full public ownership of the railways. Now!
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1257


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2023, 15:28:43 »

That's poor all round.

Also, the delay repay cut-off times set at 15, 30 and 60 minutes are a recipe for conflict and are guaranteed to be a wind-up as soon as they come up against a clock-face timetable, yes? Why someone in the industry hasn't taken one look at that from a point of view of a sanity check and immediately made adjustments...

Mark

https://www.gwr.com/help-and-support/refunds-and-compensation/delay-repay
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7688



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2023, 16:23:27 »

I wonder if Delay/Repay will be an alternative target for savings given the failure of the TOCs (Train Operating Company) plans to cut ticket offices?

Perhaps remove the 15/30 minute bands and/or make the payouts less "generous"?

Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10058


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2023, 16:58:07 »

I wonder if Delay/Repay will be an alternative target for savings given the failure of the TOCs (Train Operating Company) plans to cut ticket offices?

Perhaps remove the 15/30 minute bands and/or make the payouts less "generous"?

I wouldn’t be surprised at all.  It has already been hinted at by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly)…and that was way before the ticket office consultation.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1263


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2023, 17:08:42 »

I would say could keep going with the complaints procedure.
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 853



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2023, 16:11:59 »

My suggestion is follow up complaint to Customer Services via email, pointing out the hour delay at Romsey and the subsequent poor experience due to the following short formed service. It’s mean in the extreme to deny the 60 minutes Delay Repay just because the following train hit a timing point a few seconds early.

Complaint duly submitted ! 

I am torn between two possible outcomes here.......
1. Full payment of my claim.
2. GWR (Great Western Railway) "dying in a ditch" by claiming that I was not 60 mins late, because the train I actually travelled on was 5 seconds early at Warminster !!

............I am left wondering which would give me the most satisfaction  Wink
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40517



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2023, 16:54:50 »

Differing payment levels for 15 to 30 minutes, 30 to 60, and over 60 when so many services run at 30 and 60 minute intervals is - as previously commented - a recipe to maximise disputed delays. Better 20, 40 and 80 minute thresholds?

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 853



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2023, 19:12:30 »

Differing payment levels for 15 to 30 minutes, 30 to 60, and over 60 when so many services run at 30 and 60 minute intervals is - as previously commented - a recipe to maximise disputed delays. Better 20, 40 and 80 minute thresholds?

Grahame, I hate to nit-pick with you...............but.......... the "length of delay" times (GWR (Great Western Railway) website) are; 15 - 29 minutes: 30 - 59 minutes: 60 - 119 minutes and over 120 minutes. The figures you quote appear to side with GWR in my dispute with GWR. I maintain that I was 1 hour (60 mins) late on their hourly service, but they (?) (and you ?) appear to be saying that I was only entitled to 25% refund of my return ticket fare because I have to be 61 minutes late to claim that. Just to greatly add to my annoyance they totally ignored my request for them to explain their decision. Just a robotic bland statement, saying in effect, "we are right, you are wrong" ...........

Someting I didn't mention in my first post. When they "awarded" me the 25% refund, they informed me that they would pay me by cheque and that I had to check my card details were correct. They never seem to have any problem taking my money from that card .............but when it comes to paying it back - a different story !
Logged
Phantom
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 482



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2023, 15:34:42 »

If you did it via GWR (Great Western Railway) Delay Repay you choose how the money is refunded, you getting a cheque would be because you selected this method

I always get it repaid via BACS and have been really impressed recently how fast the amount is back in my account

Looking at the GWR website what you have been repaid is correct for a delay of 59 minutes or less
https://www.gwr.com/help-and-support/refunds-and-compensation/delay-repay

Out of interest was the second train slightly quicker arriving on the hour compared to the original?
I had a similar claim, original train was due in **:07, but the hour later arrived **:06 so was less than 60 minutes delay

Out of interest which service should you have been on and which service did you get in the end?
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 853



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2023, 13:52:58 »

If you did it via GWR (Great Western Railway) Delay Repay you choose how the money is refunded, you getting a cheque would be because you selected this method
I did ask for a BACS payment. GWR told me that they could not do this and rather "snootily" told me to check my card details. As I said earlier, GWR have never had any problems in taking money from the same card in the past.

Looking at the GWR website what you have been repaid is correct for a delay of 59 minutes or less
https://www.gwr.com/help-and-support/refunds-and-compensation/delay-repay
You are quite correct. But I claimed for a 60 minute delay, not a 59 minute one - when I queried this and asked for an explanation of the 59 minute payment........I got no answer to that question.

Out of interest was the second train slightly quicker arriving on the hour compared to the original?
I had a similar claim, original train was due in **:07, but the hour later arrived **:06 so was less than 60 minutes delay
I do not, along with probably the overwhelming majority of rail passengers, time my rail journeys to the second. According to my (pretty accurate and fairly expensive) Swiss wrist watch, the train I caught arrived in Warminster arrived at 2202 - exactly one hour after the cancelled train should have - according to the GWR website.

If my train did arrive at Warminster 1 second early - why could not GWR tell me that ............especially as I had asked that specific question in my appeal ? If I was 59 minutes and 59 seconds late and not 60 minutes, I would have to accept that. End of story !!  I would not be impressed..............other forum members have referred (above) to GWR being "mean" and "poor".................I can think of several other four letter words that could also apply !!

I must say that I find GWR's performance way less than satifactory. My train was cancelled, the next train was crowded with only half of it in use, I was an hour late getting home, I claimed for an hour's delay, GWR paid me for a 30 - 59 minute delay and GWR won't tell me why.  Perhaps my expecting a satisfactory response from GWR is just too much wishful thinking..................
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6421


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2023, 14:13:18 »

I await the outcome of my first ever claim from GWR (Great Western Railway) with some trepidation. LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) have already apologised for the cancellation of my train on the outward bound leg of my journey and started the process for a full refund. GWR has acknowledged my claim for the return.
Logged

Now, please!
Phantom
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 482



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2023, 15:07:15 »

If you did it via GWR (Great Western Railway) Delay Repay you choose how the money is refunded, you getting a cheque would be because you selected this method
I did ask for a BACS payment. GWR told me that they could not do this and rather "snootily" told me to check my card details. As I said earlier, GWR have never had any problems in taking money from the same card in the past.

Looking at the GWR website what you have been repaid is correct for a delay of 59 minutes or less
https://www.gwr.com/help-and-support/refunds-and-compensation/delay-repay
You are quite correct. But I claimed for a 60 minute delay, not a 59 minute one - when I queried this and asked for an explanation of the 59 minute payment........I got no answer to that question.

Out of interest was the second train slightly quicker arriving on the hour compared to the original?
I had a similar claim, original train was due in **:07, but the hour later arrived **:06 so was less than 60 minutes delay
I do not, along with probably the overwhelming majority of rail passengers, time my rail journeys to the second. According to my (pretty accurate and fairly expensive) Swiss wrist watch, the train I caught arrived in Warminster arrived at 2202 - exactly one hour after the cancelled train should have - according to the GWR website.

If my train did arrive at Warminster 1 second early - why could not GWR tell me that ............especially as I had asked that specific question in my appeal ? If I was 59 minutes and 59 seconds late and not 60 minutes, I would have to accept that. End of story !!

Interesting to hear that they got in contact with you to check your card details, I've only ever had standard emails that are clearly used en masse

The point about the service you were on was I was going to check the actual timings for you to see where you actually stood on this claim - happy to still help if you share the date and times etc.
With this it will either explain the amount you got or give you a cast iron case for an appeal with facts
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10058


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 06, 2023, 15:51:33 »

Differing payment levels for 15 to 30 minutes, 30 to 60, and over 60 when so many services run at 30 and 60 minute intervals is - as previously commented - a recipe to maximise disputed delays. Better 20, 40 and 80 minute thresholds?

Or you could make it even fairer and say that for any delay over 15 minutes you get that percentage refunded*.  18 minute delay = 18%, 43 minute delay = 43%. 

This would probably save the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) money on the average claim, means it’s fairer for a ‘one minute’ discrepancy as it would only make a 1% difference, and it could also form the basis for a snappy PR (Public Relations) campaign for the railways…without people realising it won’t be as generous in some cases as the existing system!

* half the percentage on a return ticket.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6421


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2023, 21:08:45 »

GWR (Great Western Railway) have now emailed to say that my claim has been allowed in full. This means I travelled to Lincolnshire and back for free, if not on time. I wish I had gone first class now.
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page