Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 00:55 11 Dec 2024
 
- Avanti West Coast workers to strike over Christmas
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Westbury - Meet the Manager
15/12/24 - New Timetable Starts
19/12/24 - MTUG Committee Plus meeting
25/12/24 - Westbury Station Closure

No 'On This Day' events reported for 11th Dec

Train RunningCancelled
23:21 Swindon to Gloucester
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 11, 2024, 01:11:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[126] NOT.......Britannia !!
[75] Closures of loops and through services - on this day, 10th Dec...
[66] Annoying / amusing use of completely irrelevant stock photos t...
[53] Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services (me...
[49] Westbury - engineering works from 24th December 2024 for 30 da...
[48] AQ10 - Where are these and what is the connection / Theme?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cyclists - death toll on our roads  (Read 5901 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42832



View Profile WWW Email
« on: November 30, 2023, 09:41:47 »

From Wiltshire Times, 30th November 1936



From Statistica


« Last Edit: November 30, 2023, 09:47:25 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2093


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2023, 07:07:02 »

Figures up to 2022:

https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.publishing.service.gov.uk%2Fmedia%2F65143a8bb1bad4000d4fd900%2Fras0601.ods&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

Figures have improved slightly. Needless to say most of the KSI involve cars.
Logged
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2023, 11:09:07 »

There's a memorial to a cyclist on the A3052 Exeter-Lyme Regis road. He suffered a heart attack. Back in the mid-1960s, I organised 10-mile cycling "out-and-home" time trials that started at the top of Trow Hill above Sidmouth and went past the memorial, with a U-turn after five miles. The events were organised under Road Time Trials Council rules, with the police being notified, but I'm sure that U-turns were banned decades ago!

In the late 1990s I spent a lot of time peering at microfilm copies of Wiltshire newspapers of the 1900s. There were quite a few cases of cyclists being fined for riding on the footpath or without lights - and of people being sent to  prison for stealing bicycles.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42832



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2024, 14:21:52 »

This thread came up as a report of  a cyclist death on 30th November 1936 and I looked up figures over the years - the graph below is the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) figures going back as far as their data is complete and categorised in this way



Road deaths overall were down from 6561 in 1936 to 1624 in 2023, cyclists done from 1498 to just 87.   Figures had risen during the second world was, peaking at 9146 in 1941 - largely "thanks" to the blackout. Every casualty is a casualty too many, but we should celebrate the almost relentless move in the right direction.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5621



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2024, 01:32:24 »

Having seen the foolhardy way in which many cyclists ride, and the poor driving by motorists I am surprised that the figures are not worse than they are.
Although a welcome reduction over years gone by, the loss of about 2,000 lives a year on the roads is nothing to be proud of !

Imagine the outrage if even one tenth of that number perished in railway accidents.

My suggestions to reduce the death toll.
1) Reduce the drink driving limit to that prevailing in our neighbour, the Irish Republic.
2) Reduce the speed limit on most roads.
3) After a driving ban is enforced, require that the offender pass an enhanced driving test, before they can drive again.
4) Offer discounted vehicle insurance if an approved speed limiter is fitted.
5) Increase fuel duty, to increase retail prices by 15% initially, and then by inflation plus 5% each year thereafter.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2093


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2024, 07:55:02 »

Maybe to expand on
Quote
1) Reduce the drink driving limit to that prevailing in our neighbour, the Irish Republic.
the government should look at this example https://news.err.ee/1609534129/estonia-s-health-minister-wants-to-tie-alcohol-excise-duty-to-inflation. This makes the valid point
Quote
for example, a situation where one government agrees to raise excise duty, while another decides to lower it.
which is important in a long term public health goal.

Interestingly in the same article Latvia are looking to restrict the times that alcohol can be sold.

All unlikely to happen as long as the British taxpayer subsidises the cost of alcohol in the bars in the Houses of Parliament.

Applying the same rationale to increasing tax to fuel duty would also help towards achieving net zero goals, as well as possibly reducing road casualties, as suggested in item 5).
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 839


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2024, 09:07:25 »

From a non-driving pedal-powered cyclist who, weather permitting, uses his bike for all local trips.

I would suggest that extending the ban on using handheld mobile devices to cyclists of all types on the move would reduce the toll. Pull over and stop if you really need to use your phone.

But...who's going to enforce it? The police? Best of luck with that!
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 955


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2024, 09:55:54 »

From a non-driving pedal-powered cyclist who, weather permitting, uses his bike for all local trips.

I would suggest that extending the ban on using handheld mobile devices to cyclists of all types on the move would reduce the toll. Pull over and stop if you really need to use your phone.

But...who's going to enforce it? The police? Best of luck with that!

As another non-driving pedal-powered cyclist, I agree. The use of hand-held mobile phones shouldn't be allowed for anyone who is in control of their movement while they are moving, whether they are driving, cycling or walking, as they are endangering others by their actions.
Logged
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2093


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2024, 11:13:18 »

I believe Hawaii passed an ordinance saying you would be fined USD50 if you stepped off the sidewalk looking at your mobile phone. Whether it was enforced or was enforcible I don't know. As another pedal-powered road user it would make life safer. And then noise-cancelling headphones, sometimes think we are getting into zombie territory.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5621



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2024, 11:36:33 »

I would not support making alcoholic drink more expensive, nor restricting availability in the UK (United Kingdom). It is already too expensive in my view.
The position is different in parts of Eastern Europe where drink is much cheaper than in the UK, and excessive drinking is a problem.
I would however support a reduction in the drink driving limit. Adopting the same limit as Ireland has the merits of simplicity.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1706



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2024, 17:15:11 »

Quote
1) Reduce the drink driving limit to that prevailing in our neighbour, the Irish Republic.

Sadly, from what I read in the papers and on-line, the increasing problem is other intoxicants. Those who campaign vociferously for their legalisation, please note.

I would also add my support to Bob B's comments about using mobile devices on the move, but add that the move towards screen operation of many controls in cars cannot help. A friend was demonstrating how his new Tesla car worked, and I was concerned at how many operations I can do without even looking down required stabbing an icon on a screen, selecting a menu and then an option on it. All such controls that work when the vehicle is in motion should be banned under safety legislation.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5621



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2024, 17:36:21 »

Regarding "other intoxicants", of which cannab1s is arguably the most popular, a simple to use roadside test is now now available for cann1bis and some other widely used recreational drugs.
Drug driving is a criminal offence, and should perhaps be treated more seriously.

I support legalisation of cannab1s, it is hard to enforce a ban on something that can be grown easily by the user. Driving whilst under the influence of cannab1s should remain a serious offence, it is at least as dangerous as drunk driving.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 587


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 02, 2024, 17:34:38 »

Quote
1) Reduce the drink driving limit to that prevailing in our neighbour, the Irish Republic.

Sadly, from what I read in the papers and on-line, the increasing problem is other intoxicants. Those who campaign vociferously for their legalisation, please note.

I would also add my support to Bob B's comments about using mobile devices on the move, but add that the move towards screen operation of many controls in cars cannot help. A friend was demonstrating how his new Tesla car worked, and I was concerned at how many operations I can do without even looking down required stabbing an icon on a screen, selecting a menu and then an option on it. All such controls that work when the vehicle is in motion should be banned under safety legislation.

My neighbour has a Tesla.  He said it was like driving an iPad.

I understand that the European vehicle regulations are being reviewed with the aim of requiring fixed switches for key functions.
Logged
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2093


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 03, 2024, 12:02:29 »

SUVs are sometimes highlighted as a particular problem. The higher front end tends to more severe effects when in collision with walkers or cyclists.
Logged
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1761


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 03, 2024, 13:02:14 »

Quote
1) Reduce the drink driving limit to that prevailing in our neighbour, the Irish Republic.

Sadly, from what I read in the papers and on-line, the increasing problem is other intoxicants. Those who campaign vociferously for their legalisation, please note.

I would also add my support to Bob B's comments about using mobile devices on the move, but add that the move towards screen operation of many controls in cars cannot help. A friend was demonstrating how his new Tesla car worked, and I was concerned at how many operations I can do without even looking down required stabbing an icon on a screen, selecting a menu and then an option on it. All such controls that work when the vehicle is in motion should be banned under safety legislation.

My neighbour has a Tesla.  He said it was like driving an iPad.

I understand that the European vehicle regulations are being reviewed with the aim of requiring fixed switches for key functions.


Being perplexed (and provoked) by the provision of touchscreens for people driving vehicles and then their marketing as infotainment,  the manufacturers seem to have headed, uninterrupted by legislation and unimpeded by reality, straight down the cost cutting path.

Different tasks, yes: I'm curious to know more about their deployment in train driving cabs and also aircraft and if there are constraints/recommendations about their use there.

Was it Nevill Hill where a contributing factor was that the driver of an IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) was required to input data using a touchscreen, with for good measure, a non-querty keyboard? Yes it was.
 
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/report-132020-collision-and-derailment-at-neville-hill

Mark
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page