Picture of a car carrying train at Piling - see
((here)) for source and creative commons license and of cars unloading - also creative commons - see
((here))Pilning is a sad case these days
from WikiPediaOn 5 November 2016, the footbridge at Pilning was demolished by Network Rail as part of the Great Western Main Line electrification project, as the bridge was too low for overhead wires and the low passenger numbers did not justify a replacement. The removal of the footbridge meant that the westbound platform was no longer accessible and thus was closed, with the final train having called on 10 September. Campaigners alleged that the removal amounted to a closure by stealth, with Network Rail apologising for not consulting residents or conforming to their code of best practice.
And one has to wonder about "possesion being 9 tenths of the law". Network Rail did not consult with residents, nor did they conform to their best code of practise. But neither has the abuse of Pilning Station been sorted out. If there was no reason to have a station there - as at Newhaven Marine, or if it was being replaced as at Angel Road, then do the job properly and close it. But Pilning is no Angel Road, nor Newhaven Marine, nor even a Berney Arms, Tygwyn or Kildonan. It's an area richly neighboured by industry a few hundred yards to the south, a plethora of motorways and junctions with massive park and ride potential for people travelling to city centres such as Bristol, Bath, Cardiff, Southampton and London. There's potential for people to walk and cycle to the station from Pilning itself, Severn Beach (where the station is not ideal for journeys to London or South Wales, and to drive there locally from places like Thornbury.
Edit to clarify quoting