Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:15 08 Oct 2024
 
- Troubled HS2 rail line may now run to central London, minister says
- Euston, we have a problem: Concern over weekly Friday night scramble
- 'I felt isolated in school': Traveller children have highest persistent absence rate
- Be prepared to wait longer for an electric taxi, says Uber boss
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 11/10/24 - TWSW General Meeting
22/10/24 - BoA Public Transport talk
25/10/24 - Melksham Transport Group
16/11/24 - Special Bletchey to Bicester

On this day
8th Oct (1952)
Harrow and Wealdstone Rail Crash (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Plymouth to Penzance
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:21 Swindon to Gloucester
23:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Bath Spa
Short Run
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
18:15 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
21:00 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
22:16 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
Delayed
Additional 17:46 Plymouth to Penzance
20:29 Par to Newquay
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
October 08, 2024, 19:18:17 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[107] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
[82] Railway Clearing House Maps
[65] Euston: a five point plan
[61] 11th October 2024 - Travelwatch Southwest general meeting, Tau...
[56] HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general dis...
[55] Rover ticket
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: South Western Railways and NR propose new plan to electrify line.  (Read 800 times)
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2414


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« on: September 30, 2024, 18:14:46 »

From Rail magazine online:

'Islands’ of third-rail electric power are being assessed for the West of England line between Basingstoke and Exeter.

Network Rail and South Western Railway have been working for two years on plans to remove diesel trains on the long-distance route.

They have involved train manufacturers and rolling stock leasing companies in studies to fit battery power to either Class 450 Desiros or new Class 701 Arterio trains, able to recharge on sections of discontinuous third-rail track.o


You need to log on to their site to read the rest.

https://www.railmagazine.com/news/2024/09/26/discontinuous-third-rail-idea-for-west-of-england-line

Edit to add link.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6416


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2024, 19:14:55 »

At last, some common sense finally prevailing by extending third rail towards Exeter even if it’s discontinuous.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12737


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2024, 19:51:57 »

So, at line speed, how many miles of third rail would be required how often to keep the b attery at least 75% charged? Or is that answer impossible?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42067



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2024, 21:41:45 »

So, at line speed, how many miles of third rail would be required how often to keep the battery at least 75% charged? Or is that answer impossible?


I suspect there are too many variables to make for an easy answer.   Let's start with "will trains be charging while sat in the Tisbury loop" ... and "will there be pickup charging on each carriage or will it be the train as a whole that charges?".  "Does in need to be 75% all the time even when it arrives in Basingstoke"
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1584


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2024, 21:43:20 »

Service to be marketed as the 'Sarum Sizzlers'.

Mark
Logged
TonyN
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 489



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2024, 09:52:22 »

Service to be marketed as the 'Sarum Sizzlers'.

Mark
It's got to be The Electric Mule
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5547



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 01, 2024, 10:32:27 »

So, at line speed, how many miles of third rail would be required how often to keep the battery at least 75% charged? Or is that answer impossible?

Too many variables to calculate I suspect. And it would depend upon WHICH miles were electrified, rather than how many miles were electrified.
Passing loops and stations would be a high priority, and inclines.

For new or heavily modified trains, energy use on battery power could be minimised, for example heat the passenger saloon to say 22 degrees on electrified sections but only to 20 degrees on battery power. In Summer, cool to 23 degrees on electrified sections, but to 25 degrees on battery power. Fill compressed air tanks to the maximum safe pressure on electrified sections, but to a lower pressure on battery power.
In cold weather, use waste heat from the electronic variable speed drive, to warm the saloon. Modern electronics are very efficient and the gain is moderate, but even a few KW per coach reduces battery drain for heating.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42067



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2024, 10:59:40 »

Service to be marketed as the 'Sarum Sizzlers'.

Mark
It's got to be The Electric Mule

That has me thinking of this sort of thing - perhaps it should be a side-thread in "The Lighter side"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal_locks#/media/File:Mule_in_the_Miraflores_Locks.JPG



In all seriousness, third rail section between also between (say) Mottisfont and Dean, and between Wilton and Warminster, could also transform and electrify the Cardiff - Portsmouth service too.   Further of topic, my first ever departure on Saturday on board a train that was electric powered from Pilning. Clean, fast, good acceleration reducing the headway needed on that line to restart trains.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5547



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2024, 21:10:03 »

Are they proposing 25 KV AC or 750 volts DC (Direct Current) ?
AC might be out nimbyed, DC is de-facto prohibited by the healthansafety.
My preferred system would be 750 volt DC overhead, lighter structures and smaller insulators so less liable to nimbys.
Use of this system reduces the need for costly grid upgrades, because the load is balanced three phase and therefore less disturbing to other consumers.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12737


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2024, 21:22:09 »

Third rail
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5547



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2024, 06:23:36 »

Third rail

I doubt that it will be allowed.
Someone, somewhere, will have to "sign off" the design as being as safe as is reasonably practicable, whilst knowingly rejecting safer alternatives such as OHLE, or batteries throughout. That person could be at risk of criminal prosecution, maybe decades later, when a trespasser is electrocuted.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1515



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2024, 07:38:50 »

I feel that this scheme should be looked at as part of a long term future full electrification strategy, not just in isolation.
There must be a fairly good case for electrifying from Southampton to Reading via Salisbury and Basingstoke for the freight route to and from Southampton. If so then this, in all likelihood will be at 25Kv OHLE. Likewise from Yeovil to Exeter might have to be considered as part of the GWML (Great Western Main Line) diversionary route as well as the Devon Metro.
Thus the scheme chosen for the Basingstoke to Exeter line should be able to sit within this not just in isolation.
However, I wonder if the current thinking is along the lines of charging as on the Greenford branch, which appears to be progressing well. If so then sections of charging rails will be in stations, perhaps Salisbury, Yeovil, Axminster and New Yard, Exeter. This might be backed up with short sections of third rail where current drain is heavy, such as Sherborne, Honiton and Crewkerne banks.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5547



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2024, 08:20:26 »

Short sections of conductor rail for charging a static train in a platform should be acceptable to the healthansafety as they could be fitted with an interlock so as to be dead except when a train is parked over them.

I remain very doubtful about all but trivial extensions to conventional conductor rail systems for reasons already given.

25KV is the future especially if heavy freight or full length, fast passenger trains are expected.
Lightweight tramway style overhead at 750 volt DC (Direct Current) is worth considering for local passenger services.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1413


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2024, 08:41:48 »

As the article is behind a pay wall,

would anyone like to hazard the cost of the 125 miles if the construction started today?
Logged
bradbrka
Transport Student
Jr. Member
****
Posts: 23


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: October 02, 2024, 11:20:32 »

The key points taken from the printed version of the article in Rail are

Modified Class 450 or 701 trains, batteries put into space that transformers would occupy if they were 25kv fitted.

15 third rail islands concentrated in areas of rapid acceleration such as stations.
 
Total 50 miles third rail.

Suitable electric connections identified avoiding needing very high voltage grid points.


Based on the above, islands would be approx. 3.3 miles long averaging 8 miles apart. Station spacing between Basingstoke and Honiton varies between 4 to 13 miles so would fit with the above. After Honiton they are more closely spaced so would not all need third rail.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page