|
grahame
|
 |
« on: June 07, 2008, 14:58:26 » |
|
If you were expecting a post about a station on the London to Brighton Line ... you ain't got one. Can you identify these three bridges?    |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
TerminalJunkie
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2008, 16:48:22 » |
|
Is 3 Thornford?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here. |
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2008, 18:15:56 » |
|
Yes, the thrid one is Thornford (someone called it "Thornford International" the other week  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2008, 18:40:51 » |
|
ahh My original theory is correct. Just realised 2 has the tunnel blanked out and just noticed a 4th rail. Must therefore be the closed (and now demolished) Wood Lane (For Exhibition)?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2008, 20:04:08 » |
|
ahh My original theory is correct. Just realised 2 has the tunnel blanked out and just noticed a 4th rail. Must therefore be the closed (and now demolished) Wood Lane (For Exhibition)? No - completely and utterly incorrect The second picture is taken with a different device (mobile phone) to the one used for most of the pictures I used, so you'll see a distinct colour match and contrast difference. I have not manipulated the image save for cropping and resizing to my standard 400 x 300 pixel format, and the whiteout is simply the device struggling with bright sunlight and a gloomy subterranian location. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2008, 20:06:12 » |
|
ahh My original theory is correct. Just realised 2 has the tunnel blanked out and just noticed a 4th rail. Must therefore be the closed (and now demolished) Wood Lane (For Exhibition)? Wood Lane was never built in a two track tunnel, certainly not of those dimensions either. It was for all essential purposes entirely underground as well. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2008, 10:01:41 » |
|
I can only see one track! Does look remarkably similar though!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2008, 11:23:19 » |
|
Ladies and gents - I'm really surprised to have 1 and 2 still "open" for answers; they're both in former "Wessex Trains" territory.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
TerminalJunkie
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2008, 12:36:30 » |
|
I'm fairly certain I'm wrong, but: 1 - Devonport?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here. |
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2008, 16:06:18 » |
|
I'm fairly certain I'm wrong, but: 1 - Devonport?
I can confirm than number 1 is not Devonport - sorry. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
Karl
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2008, 16:28:07 » |
|
Afternoon
Is No. 1 the Cornwall end of St. Germans station,
taken from the bank where one of the GWR▸ camping
coaches now oldly sits? Think its 1. all I'm
getting at the mo is two red squares with a ? in
them, after its loaded?!
Regards
Karl.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2008, 17:56:54 » |
|
'fraid it's not St Germans either ...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2008, 07:03:15 » |
|
For number 1 ... try a place with "Bridge" actually in its name  And for number 2, doesn't it look pretty suburban - I would expect our friends from Bristol to recognise it if I put it on their site  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2008, 07:22:38 » |
|
2= Clifton Down, after the very strong clue from Graham.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2008, 08:23:36 » |
|
2= Clifton Down, after the very strong clue from Graham.
Indeed it is ... I found myself wondering is I had zoomed in just too much on the original and presented it in such a way that I made it too hard ... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
