Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 25 Apr 2024
- Will Labour’s renationalisation plan make train tickets cheaper?
- Will Labour’s plan make train tickets cheaper?
- Labour pledges to renationalise most rail services
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 25th Apr

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 25, 2024, 21:02:31 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[234] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[56] access for all at Devon stations report
[53] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[36] Cornish delays
[34] Theft from Severn Valley Railway
[19] Where have I been?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The Specification On Which Tenders Were Invited  (Read 4320 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« on: May 08, 2007, 16:06:44 »

On several occasions when I have corresponded with FGW (First Great Western) , I have been given the following response :

"That was the specification that we bid against."

The link below contains the specification on which tenders were invited for the Greater Western Rail Franchise.
http://www.dft.gov.uk/foi/responses/2007/may2007/greaterwesternfranchise/greaterwesternfranchise

I have noticed something very interesting (bear in mind that the number of calls mentioned are required to be made in BOTH directions) :

"Dilton Marsh

(a) On Mondays to Fridays between 0600 and 2359, 10 services shall call at a maximum interval of three hours.

(b) On Saturdays between 0600 and 2359, 10 services shall call at a maximum interval of three hours.

(c) On Sundays, four services shall call."

Quote from Peter West (DfT» (Department for Transport - about)) :

"The minimum contractual level of train service is set out in the FGW Service Level Commitment 2 ('SLC2'), which forms part of the FGW franchise agreement.  Some changes will be made with effect from December 2007 to the route within the SLC2 of which Dilton Marsh forms part when the SLC2 reverts to its ORIGINAL form following the transfer of local train services south of Salisbury to South West Trains.   

For services on Mondays to Fridays and on Sundays, the Department does not plan to reduce the contractual minimum level of service require for Dilton Marsh post-December 2007 compared to the contractual minimum level of service provided for now (5 train services each way - Lee.) On Saturdays, the contractual minimum level of service will reduce from eight calls at Dilton Marsh in each direction to five in each direction.  The SLC2 has not yet been rewritten and the above is subject to final confirmation.  The numbers of services shown are minima and do not contractually prevent FGW from offering more stops if this is possible operationally."

In effect , the DfT have only specified half the Monday - Saturday calls at Dilton Marsh for December 2007 , compared to the original SLC2.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2007, 16:13:51 by Lee Fletcher » Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2007, 11:54:15 »

A view from Alison Forster :

Thank you for your e-mail and your patience while waiting for my response. The specifications posted on the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) website were the minimum service specifications for the Greater Western Franchise, showing the services that we had to run. We made over 200 changes to this specification to run further services but there were more changes that we were not able to make for both financial and practical reasons.

We recognise that there are more changes that customers would like to see and we will continue to lobby for those changes where we feel that they are appropriate. I appreciate you taking the time to contact me and I hope that this helps to clarify matters.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page