Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:16:45 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[72] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[67] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[66] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[59] Return of the BRUTE?
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 30
  Print  
Author Topic: Dawlish Avoiding Line - ongoing discussion, merged topic  (Read 157326 times)
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #195 on: March 02, 2014, 15:43:59 »

He also said that non-stop running wasn't an option as trains need to be full-ish on arrival into/out of  London to bolster the business case. He couldn't recommend spending loads of money just for trains arriving a quarter empty. So if you're carrying from Dawlish / Teignmouth & the Torbay area, you need to stop & pick upother pax elsewhere.

He reckoned the Okehampton route would add an hour to the journey time, and for that reason very few would choose it over Dawlish repaired. He thought it better value to make Dawlish far more weather & sea proof than spend millions on an avoiding route, other than possibly a slower diversionary route.

In that case,whoever "he" may be is talking ill informed and possibly politically motivated and biased trash.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #196 on: March 02, 2014, 16:01:48 »

Well it may not add an hour to the EXD» (Exeter St Davids - next trains)-PLY» (Plymouth - next trains) journey time, but using Okehampton as a diversionary route when necessesary leaves then entire population of Torbay and the South Hams without direct rail links to the rest of the country.

Far better in my mind to build a Dawlish Avoiding Line first. Then look at whether Okehampton-Tavistock merits reopening.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #197 on: March 02, 2014, 16:15:36 »

He also said that non-stop running wasn't an option as trains need to be full-ish on arrival into/out of  London to bolster the business case. He couldn't recommend spending loads of money just for trains arriving a quarter empty. So if you're carrying from Dawlish / Teignmouth & the Torbay area, you need to stop & pick upother pax elsewhere.

He reckoned the Okehampton route would add an hour to the journey time, and for that reason very few would choose it over Dawlish repaired. He thought it better value to make Dawlish far more weather & sea proof than spend millions on an avoiding route, other than possibly a slower diversionary route.

In that case,whoever "he" may be is talking ill informed and possibly politically motivated and biased trash.

Errr....Patrick Hallgate - Network Rail actually. He knows far more than thou
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #198 on: March 02, 2014, 16:18:05 »

Far better in my mind to build a Dawlish Avoiding Line first. Then look at whether Okehampton-Tavistock merits reopening.

You should have been there, what happened? :-)

Patrick Hallgate outlined all the five options previously announced and frankly, I thought he was saying all of them had disadvantages outweighing the advantages whether through elongated travel times, land ownership/building problems or stupid money needed. His report to HMG will be interesting...
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #199 on: March 02, 2014, 16:31:39 »

Looking to compare apples with apples, I turned to Bradshaw of 1922.   The fastest Exeter to Plymouth journey on the London and South Western was 90 minutes, and the fastest Exeter to Plymouth journey on the Great Western was faster at 82 minutes. No view expressed on how that translates for today, nor on intermediate traffic opportunities or what any future balance should be - just providing a journey time comparison from the days when the lines were competing before.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #200 on: March 02, 2014, 16:37:14 »

He also said that non-stop running wasn't an option as trains need to be full-ish on arrival into/out of  London to bolster the business case. He couldn't recommend spending loads of money just for trains arriving a quarter empty. So if you're carrying from Dawlish / Teignmouth & the Torbay area, you need to stop & pick upother pax elsewhere.

He reckoned the Okehampton route would add an hour to the journey time, and for that reason very few would choose it over Dawlish repaired. He thought it better value to make Dawlish far more weather & sea proof than spend millions on an avoiding route, other than possibly a slower diversionary route.

In that case,whoever "he" may be is talking ill informed and possibly politically motivated and biased trash.

Errr....Patrick Hallgate - Network Rail actually. He knows far more than thou
Yep Patrick Hallgate is the Route Managing Director for Network Rail.  Previous roles include RMD for the Great Eastern and MD for Infrastructure Projects London & South of England. 

His statements on the Dawlish issue would not be the whimsical ranting's of a madman or southing he dreamt up in the pup over a pint or 2, he will have tasked the senior engineers and operations mangers to optioneer the different scenarios it is likely he will have to present this and a whole rift of other climate resilience measures (Somerset, Oxford, Thames Valley) to the House of Commons Transport select committee.

« Last Edit: March 02, 2014, 21:12:09 by Electric train » Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #201 on: March 02, 2014, 17:07:16 »

Errr....Patrick Hallgate - Network Rail actually. He knows far more than thou

If he stated that ESD to Plymouth via an upgraded Okehampton line would take an hour longer than the current line via Dawlish,then he most certainly doesn't appear to know more than me.How on earth would a line which is just 5 miles shorter than the comparator line enjoy that sort of time advantage? Even BigNoseMac,who is by no means a proponent of the Okehampton route,knows that it's bullshine.Is there a transcript of the meeting available? 
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #202 on: March 02, 2014, 17:13:44 »

Unfortunately not - but there are others here that were also present.

I suspect he was referring to the likely provision should that line be built - that the maximum line speed will NOT be designed as a high-speed line at speeds such as is available on the current line...money is quite definitely a big consideration, and for various reasons he gave, would likely only be used by HSTs (High Speed Train) at time of Dawlish closure, so there would be no need to do this.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #203 on: March 02, 2014, 17:28:05 »

A diversionary route, whose main purpose would be to serve local traffic, may not justify the extra expense of re-engineering it for higher speed running to match that achieved on the existing line. Admittedly, speeds aren't great over the Devon Banks, but can they be matched by the detour around North Devon without additional expense above and beyond that needed to open the line for local services?

Notwithstanding the reversal needed at Exeter St Davids, or double reversal for services into and out of Cornwall.

Still won't add up to an hour longer journey I think. That though is not my main concern about favouring Okehampton-Tavistock for reopening. It does nothing to address the issue of Torbay and the South Hams being left with no trains when there are sea wall problems. A short inland DAL from Exminster to Newton Abbot keeps the good folk of Torquay and Totnes connected to the rail network in all weathers. As well as offering speeded up journeys to Plymouth.

Okehampton-Tavistock should be given a cost/benefit analysis on its own traffic potential. No additional weighting should be given to it as a diversionary route.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #204 on: March 02, 2014, 17:44:53 »

A short inland DAL from Exminster to Newton Abbot keeps the good folk of Torquay and Totnes connected to the rail network in all weathers. As well as offering speeded up journeys to Plymouth.

Think you're going to be disappointed - the five routes being analysed in his report are in the attached image....from one of the pages of his powerpoint that have been sent to all attendees.

Just noticed route C1 ((on coaches) National route restriction) may be your suggestion?
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #205 on: March 02, 2014, 17:46:56 »

And three of those options, C1 ((on coaches) National route restriction), C2, C3, are along the lines of what I'd like to see
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #206 on: March 02, 2014, 17:48:02 »

He was pretty clear that only one of these at most might go ahead.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #207 on: March 02, 2014, 17:56:14 »

I was there, and what Patrick Hallgate said was in the context of the ,ahem, rather lively debate surrounding the Plymouth area aspiration for a 3-hour journey time to London. He said that going via Okehampton would mean a journey time nearer to 4 hours, and notwithstanding his excellent pedigree & well-deserved meteoric rise up the NR» (Network Rail - home page) ladder, he is clearly likely to proved wrong on this. Should reinstatement happen, a (say for sake of argument) London-Reading-Exeter-one of Okehampton/Tavistock-Plymouth stopping pattern service should still be capable of getting in under 3hr 30 minutes.

Indeed, the look on his face after he said it was the classic one of those who have just uttered a hostage to fortune, as the heated conclusion of that debate clearly demonstrated.

In my opinion though, the problem for all concerned when linking the reinstatement of the route via Okehampton with the Plymouth area aspiration for a 3-hour journey time to London is that it is akin to providing the wrong answer to the wrong question.

3 hour London-Plymouth journey time services are already here, with a number contained within the current timetable. What the Plymouth folks actually want is a significant rise in the amount of such services, to the extent that the 3 hour journey time becomes the regular standard.

In order to achieve this, two significant centres of opposition need to be overcome. Firstly, many of remember that the infamous Draft December 2006 timetable contained a number of speeded-up services, at the expense of the removal of stops at Tiverton Parkway and Totnes. Huge opposition to this ensued, and was instrumental in changing the fundamental structure of the timetable towards the way it looks today. Indeed, the reinstatement of stops at Totnes came on the morning of the very day that large numbers of protesters were due to gather on the platform as a special train full of FGW (First Great Western)-invited dignitaries was scheduled to pass through.

The other main centre of opposition is one that is already rather more vocal due to what they see as an imminent threat to their London services in the upcoming franchise ^ the West Wiltshire passengers typically centred on Westbury and Pewsey, but also drawn from a wider catchment area. There is also significant concern from further afield at the connection opportunities that could potentially be lost by not stopping at Westbury.

As a result, you also have a problem that is essentially twofold ^

Passengers from the likes of Tiverton Parkway, Totnes, Westbury and Pewsey feeling angry that Plymouth give the impression of simply wanting the 3 hour standard pushed through regardless of their opposition.

Plymouth 3 hour supporters feeling angry that the likes of Tiverton Parkway, Totnes, Westbury and Pewsey want to keep hold of their existing services and perhaps add more, thus steadfastly remaining in the way of their own ambitions.

Whilst I admire the clearly-expressed determination of Matthew Golton to get this impasse sorted once and for all, I don^t recall ^magician^ being in his CV, and he is certainly going to need to be one in order to conjure up a solution to this issue.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #208 on: March 02, 2014, 18:03:46 »

Thanks for the clarification, Lee - that is indeed what Mr Hallgate said....an hour over the 3hour aspiration.

Agree with all you say above - I don't think that 3 hour aspiration you discuss will be solved until such time as further services get added & everyone get both their stops on some and faster limited-stop on others. But as Mr Hallgate said, all trains need to be around full on arrival in London - so demand has to step up big time - and personally, I don't think the extra pax are going to be forthcoming in order effectively to be full on leaving PLY» (Plymouth - next trains), or EXD» (Exeter St Davids - next trains) if one can get at least one stop there & also attain that timing.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #209 on: March 02, 2014, 18:08:15 »

And if you have a Dawlish Avoiding Line you have the potential for fasts to overtake semi-fasts which, with some clever timetabling, you can have (some of) the aspirations of all interested parties met.

Provided of course that pathing those services between London and Reading is possible.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 30
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page