Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 23 Apr 2024
* Two airlifted to hospital after light aircraft crashes
* Wales' 20mph overhaul to start in September
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 23rd Apr

Train RunningCancelled
19:23 London Paddington to Oxford
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:20 St Erth to St Ives
20:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
20:34 St Ives to St Erth
20:58 Frome to Westbury
21:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Frome
20:14 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
20:24 Evesham to London Paddington
21:25 Evesham to London Paddington
24/04/24 00:31 London Paddington to Oxford
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 23, 2024, 20:23:55 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[186] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[147] You see all sorts on the bus.
[60] "Mayflower"
[53] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[34] Penalty fares on Severn Beach Line
[28] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cross Country Diagramming  (Read 5518 times)
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« on: December 19, 2008, 21:28:04 »

Todays 1644 Bristol - Penzance was 4 car. Whilst waiting for the 1714 to Paignton the crowd of roughly 150+ people on platform 12 had no hope in hell of getting on this service and subsequently the 1714 to Paignton was also packed out. The 1714 ended up going in front of the 1644. I find the fact that peak hour trains are running about packed to the rafters (people were being turned away and crammed into First Class vestibules) whilst mid-day High Speed Trains with over 500 seats are running about transporting air is ridiculous!!! The HST (High Speed Train) diagrams in my opinion are quite frankly hopeless and don't serve any of the real demand in the South West!
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2008, 21:52:19 »

The HST (High Speed Train) diagrams in my opinion are quite frankly hopeless and don't serve any of the real demand in the South West!

That is because the HST diagrams are not intended to meet the peak demand in the SW, they are timed (as the timetable shows) for the peak demand in the section through Bristol/Birmingham/Derby/Sheffield/Leeds, southbound in am, northbound in pm. 

The requirement was described in the franchise briefing, and again in the franchise award announcement, as follows:

Quote
Bidders were asked to submit two proposals, one of which  required delivery of a minimum of approximately 30% increase in capacity measured in terms of number of seats provided on the central, most congested section of the franchise. Arriva will deliver 35% exta capacity - nearly 3000 seats on key routes - by June 2009 with most of the extra seats being provided by December 2008.

Proposal A was basically 'do nothing' - Proposal B was as above.

Paul
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2008, 23:40:32 »

Of course, if Virgin had more Pendolinos to run their B'ham to Scotland service, there would be more double Voyagers.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2008, 09:53:11 »

Of course, if Virgin had more Pendolinos to run their B'ham to Scotland service, there would be more double Voyagers.


Basically it comes down to the same thing there just isn't enough stock on BR (British Rail(ways)) to meet the demand. Until some new build comes into service tinkering with diagrams will not have much effect. Unfortuantely because we haven't electrified this new build will have to be diesel.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2008, 10:53:57 »

Of course, if Virgin had more Pendolinos to run their B'ham to Scotland service, there would be more double Voyagers.


Unfortuantely because we haven't electrified this new build will have to be diesel.

Not sure I understand this. The whole of this route is electrified, which is why it is so absurd (if not a scandal) that thirsty diesel trains are running 13 return trips a day over a 300 mile route. That's around 50,000 miles a week or 2.6million miles a year. (I understand the first northbound working is indeed a Pendo, but only for positioning.)

Building around 10 extra Pendolinos (maybe 7 coach sets), would enable a useful cascade to take place. Even better, electrify Preston to Manchester and build electric stock for the TP service to Scotland and that would enable a further cascade (or more likely, simply solve TP's rolling stock shortage). This latter stock could be 100mph Desiro, though with an Inter-City interior, not the 2+3 seating on the current build. 

 
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2008, 11:50:23 »

Of course, if Virgin had more Pendolinos to run their B'ham to Scotland service, there would be more double Voyagers.


Unfortuantely because we haven't electrified this new build will have to be diesel.

Not sure I understand this. The whole of this route is electrified, which is why it is so absurd (if not a scandal) that thirsty diesel trains are running 13 return trips a day over a 300 mile route. That's around 50,000 miles a week or 2.6million miles a year. (I understand the first northbound working is indeed a Pendo, but only for positioning.)

Building around 10 extra Pendolinos (maybe 7 coach sets), would enable a useful cascade to take place. Even better, electrify Preston to Manchester and build electric stock for the TP service to Scotland and that would enable a further cascade (or more likely, simply solve TP's rolling stock shortage). This latter stock could be 100mph Desiro, though with an Inter-City interior, not the 2+3 seating on the current build. 

 

Take your point re extra Pendolinos for Birmingham Glasgow but I was meaning in general terms because we haven't electrified  elsewhere eg Manchester Preston as you mentioned a lot of the new bulid will need to be diesel to give the capacity required on FGW (First Great Western) and XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) in teh SW.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2008, 13:36:12 »

Of course as the Pendos are built in Euroland they will be much more expensive now, so I can't even see the option for a further order which is built into the current build being exercised. (In the same way that the 4th coach for the Class 185 is now unlikely to go ahead.)
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page