Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:57 Exmouth to Paignton
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 15:17:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
  Print  
Author Topic: Windsor Branch line - services, rolling stock and signalling - ongoing discussion  (Read 55487 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2015, 08:51:28 »

I wonder what they are using for the train staff? 

For short term working when the signals are out of order in our area, they use a chap in an orange jacket.   Probably expensive for 4 weeks, though!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
autotank
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 241


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 08, 2015, 10:04:37 »

I saw the driver carrying a hoop yesterday, which to me looked like a staff although I was a passenger on a Turbo on the down relief so didn't get a great look.

Would it not be possible to raise the line speed to reduce the journey time? For a branch just over 2.5 miles, surely a 5 minute running time should be possible? It always seems slow in and out of Slough - that curve isn't THAT tight!
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1243



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 08, 2015, 10:48:50 »

Yes a raise from 20 mph average to 30 mph average does not seem too unreasonable.  I'll have to check the SA for the maximum line speed.

[Done - Update]

So from the Sectional Appendix p. 141, with an accel/decal rate of 1m/s2, I calculate an end-to-end time of 51/2 minutes (30.3 mph) - probably doable.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2015, 13:13:18 by Oxonhutch » Logged
rower40
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292

Turning signalling into a video game since 1988.


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 08, 2015, 14:22:38 »

The loop is being truncated into a siding, with access only at the Slough end.

What makes operation of the Windsor line easier (once the signalling is fully in use) is that there's now a signalled route from the Up Main into Slough platform 2, without having to go via the ground-position-light signal on the Down Relief.  The empty train (coming from Reading depot) will use this each morning to get onto the Windsor branch.
Logged
autotank
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 241


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 08, 2015, 18:45:01 »

Could this improved signalling perhaps mean later services on the branch as well? It currently finishes much earlier M-F than the Marlow and Henley branches. The last service down service is 2320 - the Henley and Marlow branches run until 2359 and 2351 respectively.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2015, 20:58:45 »

Yes a raise from 20 mph average to 30 mph average does not seem too unreasonable.  I'll have to check the SA for the maximum line speed.

[Done - Update]

So from the Sectional Appendix p. 141, with an accel/decal rate of 1m/s2, I calculate an end-to-end time of 51/2 minutes (30.3 mph) - probably doable.

Which reduces the return running time from 12 to 11 minutes. So gives 30 secs extra turnround time each end. I don't see how one could run a consistent 15 minute interval service with only 2 minute turnround for over 18 hours a day.

Re late trains, I thought one of the reasons for curtailing late night trains on the branch was that there were too many drunks!

There has also been talk of a coach park and ride for Windsor off the relief road between  the Jubilee River and the spur from Eton/Slough. Served by a new station on the branch.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2015, 21:19:26 »

I don't see how one could run a consistent 15 minute interval service with only 2 minute turnround for over 18 hours a day.

What is achieved on St Ives??

Quote
Re late trains, I thought one of the reasons for curtailing late night trains on the branch was that there were too many drunks!

In looking at the Marlow, Henley, Windsor comparison after last night's posts, I note that all 3 branches have a single connection after 22:30 from Paddington.  It just happens that with their hourly cycle, the Marlow and Henley very last train is after the Windsor very last train.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1229


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2015, 21:20:18 »

Re late trains, I thought one of the reasons for curtailing late night trains on the branch was that there were too many drunks!

The last SWT (South West Trains) train from Riverside tonight is also about the same time - 2328 to Staines. Don't know if that's for the same reason though but a lot of inner suburban SWT routes start their last london bound journeys before midnight

Which means that when I visit Windsor with friends we all have to leave earlier than we want.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 09, 2015, 22:47:01 »

The loop is being truncated into a siding, with access only at the Slough end.

Network Rail wanted rid of the loop completely as a cost saving measure. FGW (First Great Western) lobbied for a headshunt/siding. Went to the Access Disputes Committee for arbitration (ADA16 at that link) and FGW prevailed.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Louis94
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 446


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 09, 2015, 23:17:20 »

I don't see how one could run a consistent 15 minute interval service with only 2 minute turnround for over 18 hours a day.

What is achieved on St Ives??

St Ives achieves a minimum of 3 minute turnrounds, although they are not all 3 minutes - planning rules stimulate that you can't have more than three 3 minute turnrounds in a row (This applies also to Falmouth, Gunnislake, Looe, Henley, Severn Beach and Maesteg Branches in the Western Region area). This is why the calling pattern is what it is, you could have a half hourly service all calling at Lelant Saltings and Carbis Bay at 12 minutes (the booked time for it) each way if 3 minute turnrounds were allowed all day.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2015, 01:11:53 »

The Western Route Study simply states that only 3 tph is possible with the single line, and the cost increment of two trains and doubling (barely worth only doing it halfway) is not justifiable. It seems odd that the line speed can't be raised a bit, to get the transit time below 4.5 minutes. But it would be really frantic for the crew. Currently the peak service runs three 18-minute cycles (6+3+6+3) then has a slightly longer turnaround.

On capacity grounds, 3 tph x 4-car meets the 2043 predicted demand. The peak-hour figures are given for the branch - 515 in 2013, rising to 990 in 2043. The capacity, including standing, is 1152 with a 4-car EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) from 2019 (though in that Network Change dispute NR» (Network Rail - home page) maintained that use of a 4-car train was only a theoretical possibility).

How does that compare with the station usage figure? That's 1878961 in 2013/4, which can be divided by 50 and by 12 to give a rough per weekday each-way figure of 3150. Now one of the dispute documents said the busiest single train carried 204 passengers (the 8:54 to Windsor, surprisingly). That suggests the peak use of the line is more bidirectional than you would have expected. So we can guesstimate rather wildly at a bit more than twice the one-hour peak of 515 towards Slough, and a bit less the other way, i.e. 2000 for commuters. Then there would be 1000 or so return trips in the whole of the off-peak. So that's just about plausible.

On journey time, the other criterion used, 40 minutes to PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) is the aim. Their definition of "generalised journey time" adds half (I think) the interval to the actual travel time. Initially it does look as if 3 tph does badly where there the London trains are every 15 minutes. However, if there are almost as many passengers the other way, that may not be quite how it works out.

Travel time to PAD now varies a lot - from 26 minutes to 54 minutes, but roughly once per hour there is a train that's makes no connection. If Crossrail is every 15 minutes, and takes 28 minutes to Paddington (vs 40 for some stoppers now) that will be a big improvement anyway. Of course if the semifasts are removed, the quickest journeys can't be done any more. Then there's going to be trains via Heathrow, which may be faster - or not.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #26 on: April 10, 2015, 08:50:40 »

Then of course there is the mythical Windsor Link which turns the branch into a dead end from Windsor at Slough!
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: April 10, 2015, 09:47:16 »

Then of course there is the mythical Windsor Link which turns the branch into a dead end from Windsor at Slough!

Bathurst !!
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 10, 2015, 09:55:23 »

Then of course there is the mythical Windsor Link which turns the branch into a dead end from Windsor at Slough!

While now it is dead at both ends, operationally.  And of course WRAtH (Western Rail Access to Heathrow) makes that plan a dead end.

One thing that struck me about long-term plans for the branch line is that end-of-life planning for the Thames bridge may be important. If its historical status means it can't be replaced, and its strength gets too low to run trains over, that would have given a bit of weight in favour of a new line (not the line proposed). On the other hand, it would also favour closing the branch from Slough - if it happened 30 year ago that would have been the result. Assuming WRAtH is built, what do you do?

Well, another thought was that a shuttle of this length could easily be operated as one of those automatic people-mover things you find at airports. It might not be quicker end to end, but you could have loads of them with passing places to make up for it.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 10, 2015, 10:20:00 »

The loop is being truncated into a siding, with access only at the Slough end.

Network Rail wanted rid of the loop completely as a cost saving measure. FGW (First Great Western) lobbied for a headshunt/siding. Went to the Access Disputes Committee for arbitration (ADA16 at that link) and FGW prevailed.

When I follow this link (using Firefox) I get a '404' (page not found) page. A quick scan of the uri reveals an errant '\' character; replacing this with the standards-compliant '/' resolves to the correct resource. Other browsers may be more tolerant of the malformed uri.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page