Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:15 29 Mar 2024
* Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
* KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 11:23:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[132] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[52] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[51] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[32] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 8
  Print  
Author Topic: Trains without retention tanks spray human effluent over railway trackside workers  (Read 41990 times)
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: November 14, 2013, 11:06:36 »

The toilet paper piles on the tracks at Didcot used to be the only guide as to where to stand to be close to the doors - not needed now since signs are now doing the job Smiley
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #61 on: November 14, 2013, 11:48:50 »

I think it's a shocking indictment that Bob Crow has been silent on this issue until he jumped on this bandwagon....
Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #62 on: November 14, 2013, 12:43:27 »

This has been a long standing issue for the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) as long as I can remember. Say what you want about Bob Crow, but I'm afraid on this occasion this is a subject he has been campaigning about for many years.
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #63 on: November 14, 2013, 17:31:40 »

I have mixed views on all this...

Having trains with retention tanks to hold the toilet waste is one thing... But making sure the TOC (Train Operating Company) empties them is quite another.

I believe that Class 357 (c2c) and Class 377 (Southern/FCC (First Capital Connect)/Southeastern) units close the toilets once the tank reaches 75% Capacity... Which is considerably less than ideal if one had a full bladder and would like to add to that remaining 25% space...

I believe Voyagers do something similar. It is not unusual to board an XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) Service at Bristol Temple Meads and find at least one toilet out of service... Angry
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #64 on: November 15, 2013, 11:08:37 »

Agree retention tanks on short trains with few toilets on long journies are a problem particularly with DaFTs» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about) obssession with cramming as many seats in each carriage as possible. How many loos doies an IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) have for 600+? Maybe the answer is  more carriages per train with more toilets.

Or if we are going to have short trains with few toilets on long journies maybe emptying facilities on route at say Birmingham, Bristol Cardiff Manchester Preston/ Carlise Newcastle Edingburgh. After all they used to water trains at such places. Be done in 5 minutes station stop.

It's quite a clean operation provided the hose is securly coupled just like pumping out a narrow boat's tank.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: November 15, 2013, 11:17:57 »

How many loos doies an IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) have for 600+?

According to the latest draft specification I've seen, there's 5 toilets on a 5-Car Bi-Mode and 11 on a 9-Car Electric.  Sounds about right to me.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #66 on: November 15, 2013, 12:09:37 »

I have mixed views on all this...

Having trains with retention tanks to hold the toilet waste is one thing... But making sure the TOC (Train Operating Company) empties them is quite another.

I believe that Class 357 (c2c) and Class 377 (Southern/FCC (First Capital Connect)/Southeastern) units close the toilets once the tank reaches 75% Capacity... Which is considerably less than ideal if one had a full bladder and would like to add to that remaining 25% space...
Not far off, it's actually 80% full. The clue is that outside of the toilet, the WC (Wiltshire Council (Unitary Authority)) light starts flashing. 357 units only have one toilet, but on 375 and 377 units there are two toilets, and the small toilet (i.e. not the universal one) does not lock itself - that remains open, although of course a member of staff could lock it shut if it started overflowing!

As for the universal toilet, it is possible for a member of staff to open it up for further use when full, although it locks again after each further use, so only really best for situations of urgent need.

Turbos actually have a gauge fitted below the toilet on the outside of the carriage to indicate how full the toilet waste tank is. One light means 50% full, two lights mean 80% full. Although it is so low down and covered in dust/dirt seeing it in practice is difficult! With the fitment of a universal toilet as part of the Turbo refurbishment, I expect we'll see a similar feature introduced where the door locks itself.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: November 15, 2013, 13:28:06 »

Turbos actually have a gauge fitted below the toilet on the outside of the carriage to indicate how full the toilet waste tank is. One light means 50% full, two lights mean 80% full. Although it is so low down and covered in dust/dirt seeing it in practice is difficult! With the fitment of a universal toilet as part of the Turbo refurbishment, I expect we'll see a similar feature introduced where the door locks itself.

Blue lights if anyone does want to try and spot one of them lit beneath the grime!  Personally I can't wait for the new toilets to be fitted as the current ones fitted during the refresh continue to not be fit for purpose - running out of water or blocking far to quickly and easily.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: November 15, 2013, 15:57:06 »

The taps and the hand-dryers in them just seem to be generally quite poor too. The tap is only ever giving out a light spray of water at best and the hand-dryers are very feeble, it would take you an age to actually dry your hands using them. Could do with the hand-towels fitted to most of the FGW (First Great Western) fleet.
Logged
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1229


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: November 16, 2013, 12:48:04 »

The taps and the hand-dryers in them just seem to be generally quite poor too. The tap is only ever giving out a light spray of water at best and the hand-dryers are very feeble, it would take you an age to actually dry your hands using them. Could do with the hand-towels fitted to most of the FGW (First Great Western) fleet.

The sinks are badly designed.  As soon as you put your hands under the tap, the water bounces off to anywhere except the sink.

That's why there's often a wet floor in a Turbo toilet.
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9810



View Profile
« Reply #70 on: November 16, 2013, 15:41:22 »

In a strange way, that is reassuring.  Wink
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #71 on: November 16, 2013, 16:28:54 »

The notion of a Turbo Toilet brings to mind visions of "My name is Barry Scott...."

...Bang, and the dirt is gone  Cheesy
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: December 19, 2013, 10:12:46 »

This subject is revived today by the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) news site.

Quote
Cambridge rail worker's health fears over excrement spray

Rail workers are being sprayed by human urine and faeces from passing trains, putting their health at risk.

A Network Rail worker said staff were "genuinely concerned" about excrement, urine and sanitary towels on the tracks.

Network Rail accepted that train toilets which emptied on the track were "outdated and unpleasant" for track workers.

Greater Anglia said it was hoping to phase out toilets which dump waste.

The man who works across the East Anglia region said: "A train would be coming and we'd stand back the recommended distance.

"It's not unusual to feel a spray, a kind of mist in the air. That's bad enough, but then you walk back to where you've been working on the tracks there's [faeces] everywhere."

'Effort needed'

Passenger waste is discharged from trains not fitted with retention tanks.

The majority of trains running through Cambridge station are operated by Greater Anglia, First Capital Connect and CrossCountry.

More than half of Greater Anglia's trains in the Cambridge area do not have retention tanks. The other two operators' trains do not discharge on to the track.

"We'd like to see them replaced or modified, but this requires effort from across the industry and funding," said a Network Rail spokesman.

The Department for Transport said the government recognised "this is a very unpleasant experience for railway workers and the public" and was "working closely" with Greater Anglia on a fleet upgrade.

What's interesting is that I've read in Today's Railways UK (United Kingdom) (Jan 2014 issue) that the Greater Anglia Class 321s currently being refurbished at the behest of the Eversholt leasing company keep one of their non-retention toilets, while the new universal access toilet has a retention tank. The purpose of the refurbishment is to keep the units running for a further 15 years.  This seems to be a long phase out.


Moderator note: Edited to quote full news item and add link. bignosemac.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2013, 19:18:24 by bignosemac » Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #73 on: December 19, 2013, 12:05:22 »

What's interesting is that I've read in Today's Railways UK (United Kingdom) (Jan 2014 issue) that the Greater Anglia Class 321s currently being refurbished at the behest of the Eversholt leasing company keep one of their non-retention toilets, while the new universal access toilet has a retention tank. The purpose of the refurbishment is to keep the units running for a further 15 years.  This seems to be a long phase out.

I don't think the GA (Greater Anglia) 321 fleet in general are being refurbished yet.  As I understand the current situation, a single demonstrator has been produced by the ROSCO» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about), but a decision on production has not yet been made - that's why the demonstrator has two different interiors, metro at one end and suburban at the other.   I wonder if it's because fitting a retention tank on the existing does not really need to be 'demonstrated', but it is known it could be fitted if a decision was made.  Also, if they are refitted to 'metro' standards, they may remove the toilets completely anyway...

Paul
Logged
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #74 on: December 19, 2013, 17:17:29 »

Thanks, Paul. A useful clarification for me.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 8
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page