Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:35 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:24 Exmouth to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 08:47:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[77] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[72] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[70] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[63] Return of the BRUTE?
[56] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[44] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Poll
Question: Cotswold Line what do you want?
faster journey - 9 (40.9%)
better frequency - 6 (27.3%)
more standard seats - 1 (4.5%)
more first class seats - 0 (0%)
lower fairs - 5 (22.7%)
rolling stock - 1 (4.5%)
Total Voters: 22

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
Author Topic: whats important to you  (Read 19061 times)
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« on: June 20, 2009, 20:58:44 »

i never go near the Cotswold Line but this seems to be a flash point between users and think it would be interesting to see main issue
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2009, 21:00:08 »

faster service
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2009, 21:01:17 »

faster service

please vote above  Grin
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2009, 21:03:10 »

note: the fares are very reasonable especially the season tickets.  THere is sufficient FC(resolve) seating in the peaks.  And you know something, even in the morning peak there is often seating available even after reading in SC - I often look as I walk to the elevators to move over to plat 10.  

I remember a few years ago, even after oxford there were people sitting in the vesdtibules of FC because everyhere else was rammed.

I think almost everyone would agree turbos are just not designed to be sat in for 2.5 hours!
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2009, 21:03:25 »

faster service

please vote above  Grin

I DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains)!
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2009, 21:07:48 »


as soon as i wrote that it popped up must be a delay on votes, only 2 people have voted so far
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2009, 23:29:50 »

Difficult choice, but faster service will always win.

At the end of the day, it is the only one to get people out of their cars. If Worcester people knew they could get to London in 2 hours, the passenger numbers would boom.

Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: June 20, 2009, 23:46:05 »

It's interesting that you've posted your poll in 'across the west', relex109, yet you seem to have made it specific to the Cotswold line. That may be why you've received so few responses?

No problem: I'll reply on the basis of my own perception of what I generally look for on journeys 'across the west' - in which case, I'd tend to agree with previous posters, and voted for 'faster service'.  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2009, 07:01:20 »

I'm glad you noticed as I wasn't sure where to put this please could you move it for me :-) btw in okehampton today if you can make it
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2009, 09:29:24 »

I'm glad you noticed as I wasn't sure where to put this please could you move it for me ....

Topic duely moved ... and I have posted a "please go and vote" advertorial where it was ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2009, 12:16:06 »

What i would want, as would most people, if asked - is an utterly reliable, punctual service - which is not an option here. Note that the number of posts to the Charlbury commuter blog has fallen off a cliff in recent times, because FGW (First Great Western) are doing a good job of delivering on that front - whether or not some people want to acknowledge it. I wonder what West Coast customers would say they want - a Virgin flier once a day each way, or a service that does a bit better than 21% on time, which is how bad it has got some days recently due to infrastructure failures.

Allied to that would be plugging the holes in the current timetable - sort of addressed here - better provision for commuting in the Vale of Evesham to Worcester and some sort of shuttle at the southern end of the line to produce a 30-minute frequency for much of the day.

Quote
Difficult choice, but faster service will always win.

At the end of the day, it is the only one to get people out of their cars.

So why are Virgin running trains every 20 minutes on the Birmingham and Manchester routes? Following your logic, one train an hour running at Virgin's headline timings should suffice. With slower FGW journey times on most routes, in recent years, traffic should have been falling if you are right - it hasn't, until recently perhaps, and that's nothing to do with the speed the trains are running at.

And some people go on and on about "park-and-ride" passengers from Charlbury and Hanborough. If you put on more frequent trains, then you would get plenty of cars off the roads between those places and Oxford - a reliable service with a turn-up-and-go frequency is a far better traffic builder than a headline timing achieved by one train a day.

As for "lower fairs" - is this some kind of attack on the Cotswolds' penchant for village fetes?
« Last Edit: June 21, 2009, 14:25:56 by willc » Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 23, 2009, 20:49:15 »

Quote
So why are Virgin running trains every 20 minutes on the Birmingham and Manchester routes?

Unfair comparison for 2 reasons:

1. All of the VT (Virgin Trains - former franchises) services are fast.

2. Apart from plugging the gaps, there is no scope for frequency improvements for Worcester - London trains. Even I am prepared to admit that 30 minute frequencies Worcester to London would be excessive! Wink Some extra commuter trains from Evesham to Worcester would be good, but the majority of Worcester people will want journey time and reliability improvements first.

Quote
As for "lower fairs" - is this some kind of attack on the Cotswolds' penchant for village fetes?
Tongue
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 24, 2009, 00:29:04 »

Let me remind you of your own words:

Quote
Difficult choice, but faster service will always win.

At the end of the day, it is the only one to get people out of their cars

Faster is not the only way to get people out of their cars - that's why Virgin run high-frequency, it gets people out of cars and also gets them off planes - the number of Manchester-London flights is in rapid decline, in part because the trains are faster, but also because - so long as NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s rubber bands stay on for the day - after years and years of disruption for engineering work on the WCML (West Coast Main Line), it offers a reliable service, and you don't need to look at a timetable, just turn up at the station. Therefore, speed is not the only factor at work.

Virgin's trains are 'faster' because the few places they stop at are a whole lot bigger than Hereford or Worcester (eg Coventry is twice the size of the two combined, MK (Milton Keynes) is fast heading that way), so they don't need to make so many stops to pay their way. That simply doesn't apply on the Cotswold Line, never has and never will. Even one super-fast HST (High Speed Train) a day, with 472 people from Hereford and Worcester filling every single seat before it leaves Shrub Hill, will not alter the economics of the route, which are reliant on money from the intermediate stations.

And here you are saying there is no scope for frequency improvements on the Cotswold Line, yet you have on many occasions in the past advocated either booting intermediate passengers off Worcester trains at Oxford or splitting trains at Oxford, with the following stopper, or the rear portion of the train, then making the full journey through to Worcester - and the whole process being repeated in the other direction - which looks to me rather like a doubling of the frequency - and a doubling of fuel bills, train crew costs and wear and tear on the track - but then of course, so much new money will flow from Worcester that it will all pay for itself - silly me for forgetting that.

How much more reliable than 94.5 per cent do you want FGW (First Great Western) to be? Even Chiltern, Merseyrail and c2c are now stuck at 96-97 percent, with far less complicated networks than FGW runs


Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: June 24, 2009, 00:37:27 »

Let me remind you of your own words:

Quote
Difficult choice, but faster service will always win.

At the end of the day, it is the only one to get people out of their cars

Faster is not the only way to get people out of their cars - that's why Virgin run high-frequency, it gets people out of cars and also gets them off planes - the number of Manchester-London flights is in rapid decline, in part because the trains are faster, but also because - so long as NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s rubber bands stay on for the day - after years and years of disruption for engineering work on the WCML (West Coast Main Line), it offers a reliable service, and you don't need to look at a timetable, just turn up at the station. Therefore, speed is not the only factor at work.

Virgin's trains are 'faster' because the few places they stop at are a whole lot bigger than Hereford or Worcester (eg Coventry is twice the size of the two combined, MK (Milton Keynes) is fast heading that way), so they don't need to make so many stops to pay their way. That simply doesn't apply on the Cotswold Line, never has and never will. Even one super-fast HST (High Speed Train) a day, with 472 people from Hereford and Worcester filling every single seat before it leaves Shrub Hill, will not alter the economics of the route, which are reliant on money from the intermediate stations.

And here you are saying there is no scope for frequency improvements on the Cotswold Line, yet you have on many occasions in the past advocated either booting intermediate passengers off Worcester trains at Oxford or splitting trains at Oxford, with the following stopper, or the rear portion of the train, then making the full journey through to Worcester - and the whole process being repeated in the other direction - which looks to me rather like a doubling of the frequency - and a doubling of fuel bills, train crew costs and wear and tear on the track - but then of course, so much new money will flow from Worcester that it will all pay for itself - silly me for forgetting that.

How much more reliable than 94.5 per cent do you want FGW (First Great Western) to be? Even Chiltern, Merseyrail and c2c are now stuck at 96-97 percent, with far less complicated networks than FGW runs




Is it too much to ask........

One service in each direction be an express

I suggest the 0630ish in the morning and the 1830ish in the evening - (yes its selfish! but I would adapt if other services were more appropriate)

Just give worcester area passengers the chance to get to london in two hours - we know its possible - it used to happen

I was asked how many people even contemplate what I do - that is only because of distance.  How many people in the SE commute nearly two hours each way - large number I suspect.  Give us a fast service - more maybe would.



Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 24, 2009, 01:10:06 »

And as Industry Insider has already demonstrated, you are highly likely to get something nearer to 2hrs post-redoubling, with the trains making stops much as they do now - I don't believe five or 10 minutes past that mark really is the end of the world and I don't think most people in Worcester would be that bothered either, if they knew the train was going to get them there on the dot of the published time - though I agree a London arrival time about 8.35-8.40 for the first Hereford is needed.

How many people with a two-hour commute actually want to do it? And unless you work around Paddington, you need to add cross-London time in too, along with travel to and from the station at the other end. You are a pretty rare case and I really don't think that's going to change - even when it was 1hr 20mins for the fastest train between Moreton and London, regular commuters were rare birds and no more common than they are now - and they usually catch the first two trains of the day, which have never been the quickest, not the Herefords.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page