Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:53:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[193] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[109] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[75] Return of the BRUTE?
[59] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[26] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1046600 times)
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #420 on: November 29, 2010, 21:54:24 »

There is a piece in Modern Railways December saying Crossrail is limited to ^14 billion down a billion.

They seem to be looking for things to cut (or build cheaper) so not building the Maidenhead turnback sidings would seem an obvious saving.

Especially as hopefully Reading remodelling will be finished, unless it turns into another Leeds for those of you old enough to remember, before the wires arrive. Hopefully without new signal structures with insufficient headroom as per Newport.

I always thought Crossrail should electrify the Greenford branch with an interchange at North Acton (not Greenford) with the Central Line. That would enable 4tph currently terminating at Paddington to run round the loop. It would also enable Heathrow Express and Connect to turn threir units round and prevent excesive wheel wear on the tight one way curves at Airport Junction
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #421 on: November 29, 2010, 23:48:34 »

Quote
To change the Crossrail Act would take up Parliamentary time the Government would argue they have more important uses for that time.

If any further legislation is required, and as Paul says, it may not be needed anyway, it could be done quickly as a private bill, for which time is set aside in Parliament. There are about 10 or so such bills currently going through, including some from TfL» (Transport for London - about), which is in charge of Crossrail.

Quote
Morton Cutting is a possibility for a construction depot for GWML (Great Western Main Line) electrification it is to far out of the reach of Crossrail, Maidenhead would be a stabling depot for the main one at OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)).

Moreton is nearer to London than Wellingborough, where engineering trains for London Underground modernisation are marshalled, or, er, Taunton, where the GWML track renewal train and high-output ballast cleaner are stabled, so face a bit of a trip to do any work in the Thames Valley area. And if they decide that Crossrail is going to go to Reading, they won't be spending a penny piece on sidings at Maidenhead.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #422 on: November 30, 2010, 08:17:35 »

"And if they decide that Crossrail is going to go to Reading, they won't be spending a penny piece on sidings at Maidenhead."

Let's hope you are right willc!
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #423 on: December 01, 2010, 00:22:39 »

I think that the Home Secretary might have something to say about them shelling out money for sidings that wouldn't be needed right in the heart of her constituency. And Theresa May is a staunch advocate of Crossrail going right through to Reading, as Twyford is also in her constituency.

I should add, after our discussion above, that her website's Crossrail page, though oddly not updated for about two years, contains the following ministerial assurance, given to her in 2008:

Quote
Importantly, he confirmed that the line could be extended under existing legislation and it would not have to go through the same lengthy parliamentary procedures as this Bill.More

See http://www.tmay.co.uk/news/?c=crossrail
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #424 on: December 01, 2010, 12:50:08 »

This part of the government's statement last Thursday caught my eye:

"In total the Government will deliver more than 2,100 new rail carriages onto the network by May 2019. Of these, 1,800 will be for new Crossrail and Thameslink services. This will in turn free up hundreds of existing electric carriages to be deployed onto the newly electrified lines by franchised train operators. In total, there will be at least 1,850 net additional carriages on the network by 2019. The Government will now enter into commercial negotiations with the franchised operators about the allocation of the unallocated element of 650 further carriages for delivery before 2014. Subject to those negotiations, the Government expects additional carriages to be added on services into Leeds, Manchester, Sheffield, Liverpool, Newcastle, Birmingham, Bristol, London Paddington and London Waterloo."

Does anybody know exactly why they've mentioned London Paddington?  Obviously, extra capacity will be provided by transferred Class 319's and whatever form the HST (High Speed Train) replacement takes, but that paragraph specifically mentions the extra 650 carriages allocation and Paddington in one sentence.  Are there going to be other capacity improvements or am I missing something?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #425 on: December 01, 2010, 17:25:09 »

Your guess is probably as good as anyone's.

Await Roger Ford's disection of the figures with interest.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #426 on: December 01, 2010, 19:39:52 »

Taking the 5 spare 180s into use with FGW (First Great Western) would count as extra capacity into Paddington.

How is that relevant to new stock, I hear you all ask?

How about new 172 to LM (London Midland - recent franchise), 150 to FGW, 142 back to Northern, releasing 180 to FGW...

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #427 on: December 02, 2010, 00:50:54 »

How about new 172 to LM (London Midland - recent franchise), 150 to FGW (First Great Western), 142 back to Northern, releasing 180 to FGW...

I'm sure if the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) really worked it out they could factor the Class 483's on the Isle Of Wight into that cascade somewhere!  Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1260


View Profile Email
« Reply #428 on: December 14, 2010, 11:30:35 »

Article in todays western mail suggesting thet the DFT (Department for Transport) have decided to only electrify as far as Bristol with Dual fuel trains being used on London -  Swansea services.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2010/12/14/network-director-says-high-speed-link-is-off-the-rails-91466-27820336/


Big mistake in my opinion if it does turn out to be true
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #429 on: December 14, 2010, 13:40:15 »

... But on the plus side there is the suggestion that electric wires may eventually reach Plymouth. 

They were always going to do the bit closest to London first anyway so I won't be too disappointed.   
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #430 on: December 14, 2010, 15:17:05 »

Article in todays western mail suggesting thet the DFT (Department for Transport) have decided to only electrify as far as Bristol with Dual fuel trains being used on London -  Swansea services.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2010/12/14/network-director-says-high-speed-link-is-off-the-rails-91466-27820336/


Big mistake in my opinion if it does turn out to be true

Unless they're playing a game which involves trying to get the Welsh Assembly to stump up for wiring south Wales...imagine the fuss across the Severn if the wires ran out just before the border.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #431 on: December 14, 2010, 16:24:55 »

... But on the plus side there is the suggestion that electric wires may eventually reach Plymouth. 

Plymouth has always been a future proposal in the Electrification RUS (Route Utilisation Strategy), like the majority of other extensions people suggest will never happen.  NW and GW (Great Western) are not supposed to be the last or only lines to be electrified, they are intended to be the first of the rest...

Paul
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #432 on: December 14, 2010, 17:02:51 »

We need to get on with putting the wiring up rather than worrying about where they will end.  NR» (Network Rail - home page) need a chance to demonstrate that they can do it properly and efficiently (they better not blow it) and with each mile strung up the business case for the next mile improves.   
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #433 on: December 14, 2010, 18:59:53 »

We need to get on with putting the wiring up rather than worrying about where they will end.  NR» (Network Rail - home page) need a chance to demonstrate that they can do it properly and efficiently (they better not blow it) and with each mile strung up the business case for the next mile improves.   
Exactly.  NR want to get to grips with a "new" electrification scheme on an operational railway, up until now it has only done renewals.

Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #434 on: December 14, 2010, 20:15:15 »

IMHO (in my humble opinion) it should be easier to put up new electrifcation than do renewals and alterations.  A new installation doesn't have to be returned to working order at the end of every weekend possession, which was apparently one of the main issues with the rebuild at Rugby, where they were continually trying to do track alterations and reposition previously working wires at the same time...

In any case, the usual contractors (such as Balfour Beatty) will be practicing by doing new installations in Scotland long before they get going down here...   Roll Eyes

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page