Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 29 Mar 2024
- Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 14:29:03 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[135] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[85] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[36] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[34] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[33] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1046914 times)
Maxwell P
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 116



View Profile Email
« Reply #435 on: December 15, 2010, 12:45:51 »

Taking the 5 spare 180s into use with FGW (First Great Western) would count as extra capacity into Paddington.

How is that relevant to new stock, I hear you all ask?

How about new 172 to LM (London Midland - recent franchise), 150 to FGW, 142 back to Northern, releasing 180 to FGW...

Paul

I believe that the 180s are heading north, I think to Grand Central and that 3 HSTs (High Speed Train) will come the other way.   My info dates back to early October and I have heard nothing else since, but it was an FGW director who mentioned this during a visit west.
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #436 on: December 15, 2010, 23:50:06 »

Article in todays western mail suggesting thet the DFT (Department for Transport) have decided to only electrify as far as Bristol with Dual fuel trains being used on London -  Swansea services.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2010/12/14/network-director-says-high-speed-link-is-off-the-rails-91466-27820336/


Big mistake in my opinion if it does turn out to be true

I think that this probably refers to the subdivision of the project for appraisal purposes.

Generally this involves costing  options of do nothing, do everything and several points in between.
The suburban  part would have optional terminations of Reading, then Oxford finally Newbury. With re-used stock the solution is quick and in this case favourable.

For the IC (Inter City) section, options costed would be Bristol (3 possible routes), Cardiff and Swansea.
Evidently there's no problem with Bristol but the South Wales loadings may be more marginal. There's the added complication of what trains to purchase which may also affect the outcome of the marginal sections.

The simplest rolling stock solution IMHO (in my humble opinion) would be 5 x 23m  car EMU (Electric Multiple Unit)'s (Class 342?) of 125 mph.
The best would be TGV (Train a Grande Vitesse)'s/ICE's but the infrastructure would need more work but not too much thanks to IKB (Isambard Kingdom Brunel).

OTC
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #437 on: December 17, 2010, 17:13:43 »


The 2007 Station Entries and Exits gives the following approx (Mpax/yr):

Swindon                   2.5
Chippenham             1.4
Bath Spa                  4.2
Bristol TM(resolve)                 6.5
Bristol PW (Permanent Way)                1.8
Newport                   2.0
Cardiff                     9.1
Bridgend                  1.2
Port Talbot               0.35
Neath                      0.57
Swansea                  1.6

Not all of the footfalls are FGW (First Great Western) of course.

Cardiff wiring looks safe but Swansea?Huh

OTC
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1704


View Profile
« Reply #438 on: December 17, 2010, 18:48:50 »

Those Cardiff figures will have a hefty component from the Valley lines. Swansea hasn't got an equivalent suburban network.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #439 on: December 17, 2010, 22:38:08 »

Article in todays western mail suggesting thet the DFT (Department for Transport) have decided to only electrify as far as Bristol with Dual fuel trains being used on London -  Swansea services.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2010/12/14/network-director-says-high-speed-link-is-off-the-rails-91466-27820336/

Big mistake in my opinion if it does turn out to be true

Indeed it might be, but I thought we'd all learn not to trust a damn word of these so called exclusives - no matter who's been misquoted this time -  following all the nonsense leading up to the Comprehensive Spending Review statement, and follow-up statement from Philip Hammond.

I can't be bothered to drag up all the links, but we all remember being told that Crossrail was either going to terminate at Heathrow and/or the the Abbey Wood extension was to get axed.  Then there was the removal of ATO (Automatic Train Operation) or other cuts to the Thameslink project.  Then there was the cancellation of the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) project with HST (High Speed Train) being life-extended.  Then there was the GWML (Great Western Main Line) electrification to be completely shelved in preference to electrifying the MML» (Midland Main Line. - about).  Need I go on?  I don't remember a single article getting anywhere near being correct in what's been announced so far!

Let's just wait and see...  Cool
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #440 on: December 17, 2010, 23:46:02 »

Thanks very much for your 'words of wisdom', IndustryInsider!

I've heard some rather more encouraging opinions recently, from very senior staff at FGW (First Great Western).  While I obviously can't reveal my sources, I'm now rather inclined to follow IndustryInsider's suggestion: let's just 'wait and see', shall we? ...  Wink Cheesy Grin

CfN.  Lips sealed
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #441 on: December 18, 2010, 08:56:11 »

Article in todays western mail suggesting thet the DFT (Department for Transport) have decided to only electrify as far as Bristol with Dual fuel trains being used on London -  Swansea services.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2010/12/14/network-director-says-high-speed-link-is-off-the-rails-91466-27820336/

Big mistake in my opinion if it does turn out to be true

Indeed it might be, but I thought we'd all learn not to trust a damn word of these so called exclusives - no matter who's been misquoted this time -  following all the nonsense leading up to the Comprehensive Spending Review statement, and follow-up statement from Philip Hammond.

I can't be bothered to drag up all the links, but we all remember being told that Crossrail was either going to terminate at Heathrow and/or the the Abbey Wood extension was to get axed.  Then there was the removal of ATO (Automatic Train Operation) or other cuts to the Thameslink project.  Then there was the cancellation of the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) project with HST (High Speed Train) being life-extended.  Then there was the GWML (Great Western Main Line) electrification to be completely shelved in preference to electrifying the MML» (Midland Main Line. - about).  Need I go on?  I don't remember a single article getting anywhere near being correct in what's been announced so far!

Let's just wait and see...  Cool
The mode of operation of the current Government is to "fly a kite" in other words the group doing the reviewing will send out questions to seek opinions to alsorts of stake holders, these questions or opinion seeking do get leaked to the press may be deliberately at times
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #442 on: January 17, 2011, 16:51:09 »

From Railnews:

Quote from: Railnews
New bid for GW (Great Western) electrification to Wales

A group of political and business leaders in South Wales is urging the Department for Transport to extend the electrification of the Great Western Main Line to Bristol, Cardiff and Swansea.

One councillor said the issue was a ^critical^ one for the Welsh capital.

The transport secretary Philip Hammond announced partial electrification of the Great Western route on 25 November.

This will take the wires on from their present termination on the main line at Airport Junction, near Hayes and Harlington, as far as Newbury and Oxford.

After the announcement in November, Welsh First Minister Carwyn Jones branded the news ^disappointing^. Transport minister Ieuan Wyn Jones was also critical, accusing the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) of ^sidelining^ the Principality.

Mr Hammond^s plan to include Oxford would also mean the electrification of the main GW line as far as Didcot Parkway but the group, of about 80 community leaders, says continuing electrification across the Severn to South Wales would provide an essential economic lifeline.

The group, the Great Western Partnership, includes local authorities as well as the South East Wales Economic Forum.

The leader of Cardiff council Rodney Berman said: ^Electrification of the main line is a critical issue for the Cardiff city-region which is why we, along with Bristol and Swindon councils, formed the Partnership.^

The electrification announced so far by the DfT would cater for commuter and regional services between London and the Thames Valley, but leaves the question of intercity trains undecided. The DfT said: ^The extent of further electrification for intercity services is dependent on the intercity train option we choose.^

This will hinge on the eventual fate of the delayed Intercity Express Project. Hitachi was named as preferred IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) bidder almost two years ago, but the programme has stalled since then, partly because of economic problems but also because the extent of future electrification is still under review.

A wider assessment of railway spending is in progress, which will be informed by Sir Roy McNulty^s ^Value for Money^ report, due to be published this year.

Another factor is the recent go-ahead for High Speed 2 between London, Birmingham, Manchester, the East Midlands and Leeds, which would influence the case for and against electrifying the Midland Main Line between Bedford and Sheffield.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1260


View Profile Email
« Reply #443 on: February 03, 2011, 15:17:45 »

This has been released in the last day or so:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5iJOfrNsWyFJD2dAspCiUZdt44hhw?docId=N0512321296653692392A

. There another article which i will have a look for now which stated that HST (High Speed Train)'s would continue to work London - Plymouth/Penzance services for anothee decade before some  Bi-mode class 222 's are displaced from the Midland mainline which is also looking like it will be electrified in the near future
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #444 on: February 03, 2011, 17:32:45 »

There another article which i will have a look for now which stated that HST (High Speed Train)'s would continue to work London - Plymouth/Penzance services for anothee decade before some  Bi-mode class 222 's are displaced from the Midland mainline which is also looking like it will be electrified in the near future
A 222 all the way from Paddington to Penzance?  Shocked I don't think the good people of the Southwest are going to like that very much and with good reason. Just think of the summer holiday traffic and luggage cramming onto a 222. No bad idea if that is what Daft are thinking IMHO (in my humble opinion).
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #445 on: February 03, 2011, 18:10:39 »

You'd be surprised, they're much better than Voyagers, although not necessarily the best possible solution for PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-PNZ in the summer.

But what's a "bi-mode" 222...? Was it a slip of the keyboard or are Bombardier still muttering about the feasibility of making the 22x series electric or bi-mode by bolting a pantograph onto the roof? Think that will require some fairly major surgery on the bodyshells since to the best of my knowledge they're all monocoque pre-stressed car bodies that don't have pantograph wells.
Logged
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1336



View Profile
« Reply #446 on: February 03, 2011, 18:26:15 »

The idea is to build an additional coach with pantograph and transformer, at the same time increasing seating capacity.
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #447 on: February 03, 2011, 21:07:11 »

You'd be surprised, they're much better than Voyagers, although not necessarily the best possible solution for PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-PNZ in the summer.
Yes they are better than Voyagers but they are still noisy underfloor engined trains not ideal for travelling the long distances involved from London to the West of England.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #448 on: February 03, 2011, 21:10:48 »

Long distance London to the Southwest? your having a laugh, currently there is a Voyager that runs Aberdeen to Penzance! you'd have to pay ME to travel on that lol!
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #449 on: February 03, 2011, 22:09:41 »

IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) deal 'close to completion' http://www.railpro.co.uk/news/?idArticles=694
Quote from said article "This deal was largely finalised in the last few days, and is now ready for political approval."
Electrification to Bristol only using Bi-mode IEP to Bristol/Southwales and refurbished HSTs (High Speed Train) for another 10 years to the South West followed by Midland Mainline Electrification,Meridians fitted with additional pantograph cars could then be cascaded as bi-mode trains to the Plymouth and Penzance services run on electric power as far as Newbury.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page