Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:55 18 Apr 2024
- Dubai airport delays persist after UAE storm
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
18th Apr (2018)
SEWWEB leaflet launched and Aztec West (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
18:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
18:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:14 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
19:46 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
22:24 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
23:08 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:28 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
18:57 London Paddington to Great Malvern
19:05 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:50 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
Delayed
16:18 London Paddington to Swansea
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:02 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 18, 2024, 18:55:31 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[44] Signage - not making it easy ...
[22] IETs at Melksham
[19] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[18] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
[17] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1051171 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #555 on: March 01, 2011, 18:27:45 »

Why would  they [319s] need shoes? There'll be wires to Abbey Wood.  Not likely to be relevant anyway though.  What is a valid point is that the Crossrail fleet will have to be increased if it is used to Reading, as it will have been sized exactly for the original planned timetable.

Paul
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #556 on: March 01, 2011, 18:33:01 »

IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) looks like it's gone to Hitachi, with the factory at Newton Aycliffe.

It went to Hitachi ages ago surely?  

I think it's fair to say that the Foster review created reasonable doubt, at the very least.

Agreed, but contracturally Hitachi were always preferred bidder.

Paul
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #557 on: March 01, 2011, 18:34:25 »

It was decided a while ago that the Crossrail Abbey Wood branch would be third rail to keep the costs down
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17875


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #558 on: March 01, 2011, 18:35:08 »

Hammond's statement in full is transcribed on the Railway Eye blog. I'm not going to copy and paste because it's quite long, but you can find it here.

For completeness, it's also available on the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) website, at http://www.dft.gov.uk/press/speechesstatements/statements/hammond20110301  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #559 on: March 01, 2011, 18:40:53 »

We'll see how today's announcement shakes out over the coming months, but overall a hugely positive day of announcements for the railway industry.

No mention of the MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) and building of a new pantograph fitted carriage for the Class 222's?  Was that all ill-founded rumour, or is there a further announcement to be made?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Zoe
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 746


View Profile
« Reply #560 on: March 01, 2011, 18:49:00 »

No mention of the MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) and building of a new pantograph fitted carriage for the Class 222's?  Was that all ill-founded rumour, or is there a further announcement to be made?
HSTs (High Speed Train) will remain in service on the MML for now.  A decision on the MML is dependent on the outcome of the HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) consultation.  It should also be noted that bi-mode IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) units are future possibility for Westcountry services so there would then be no need for a 222 cascade.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #561 on: March 01, 2011, 19:48:27 »

Looking back to the first post on this thread in July 2009, I have to say that there is little difference in the electrification plans as announced then excepting that Cardiff is in from the start.

So, should the coalition Government be getting all the plaudits here? We also owe a great deal of thanks to Andrew Adonis.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Zoe
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 746


View Profile
« Reply #562 on: March 01, 2011, 19:57:06 »

We still don't know the exact form the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) will take though.  Either the original EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) with generator car concept or the more recent underfloor engine DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) with pantograph to power the traction motors when under the wires plan.  The future of the Westcountry services is also still undecided long term.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #563 on: March 01, 2011, 20:00:24 »

I was pointing out that the electrification plans are little changed. No mention of the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) rolling stock in the OP (Original Poster / topic starter).

One major change in the IEP side of things is the number of jobs being created at Newton Aycliffe. Agility originally announced 2500 jobs in February 2009. That number has dropped to 500 following today's announcement.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2011, 20:50:03 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #564 on: March 01, 2011, 20:39:26 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
London-Cardiff rail electrification, but not to Swansea

A ^1bn electrification of the main rail line between London and Cardiff is to go ahead, it has been confirmed. However, the Welsh Assembly Government had been lobbying the Westminster coalition to electrify the Great Western line as far as Swansea. But the UK (United Kingdom) government said it had found "no evidence of a pattern of demand" and trains will switch to diesel power between Cardiff and Swansea from 2017.

Electrifying the valleys commuter lines remains a future possibility.

A plan to electrify the line was announced by the previous Labour government in 2009. Ministers in the assembly government were pressing the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition in Westminster to stick to the plan. A decision on whether to electrify the line was postponed last November.

Supporters say electrification could cut journey times from Cardiff to London by about 20 minutes, and argue electric trains are cleaner and cheaper.

In a statement to MPs (Member of Parliament), Transport Secretary Philip Hammond said he had looked carefully at the arguments in favour of electrifying the line as far as Swansea. He said the business case was heavily dependent on the frequency of service.

'No evidence'

"Services between London and Swansea currently operate at a frequency of only one train an hour off-peak," he said. "There is no evidence of a pattern of demand that would be likely to lead imminently to an increase in this frequency. Consequently, I regret to say that there is not, at present, a viable business case for electrification of the main line between Cardiff and Swansea."

Trains will switch automatically to diesel power as they leave Cardiff.

Mr Hammond said that because of speed limits dictated by the geometry of the line "there would be no time saving benefits from electrifying the line from Cardiff to Swansea".

A plan to electrify the Great Western line from London to Berkshire and Oxfordshire has already got the go-ahead.

Mr Hammond said London-Cardiff journey times would come down to 1hr 42 min, while 22 minutes would be saved off London-Bristol journeys.

Welsh Secretary Cheryl Gillan said the announcement was vital to the recovery of the Welsh economy and that the case for electrification to Swansea remained under review. She said her department will work with the assembly government on a business case to electrify commuter lines north of Cardiff to Treherbert, Aberdare, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney, and to Penarth and Barry in the Vale of Glamorgan.

'Economic lifeline'

"On St David's Day, this is excellent news for all parts of south and west Wales," she said. Mrs Gillan said the previous government had 13 years to electrify the line "but failed to do anything beyond headline-grabbing stunts".

But Labour claimed businesses and passengers living west of the Welsh capital had suffered a "St David's Day disappointment" as the electrification would not extend as far as Swansea.

Deputy First Minister Ieuan Wyn Jones said he was pleased the UK government had recognised the strength of the case to electrify lines in the valleys, but was disappointed Swansea had been left out of today's announcement.

"This is a blow to our aspirations to see economic benefits flow to the whole of Wales and will be a particularly damaging to the south west of Wales," Mr Jones said. He told BBC Radio Wales it would be more cost effective to include Swansea at the same time as Cardiff, rather than trying to upgrade the line in two stages.

First Great Western managing director Mark Hopwood said: "This is great news for our customers and the railway industry as a whole as it will bring reductions in journey time and a more reliable, environmentally friendly service."

CBI Wales director David Rosser welcomed "an excellent announcement", adding: "The Great Western main line is an essential economic lifeline for the south Wales economy. Today's announcement from the UK government will reinforce Cardiff as a 21st Century city, enabling it to play a key role in creating a more balanced UK economy with wealth creation more evenly spread across the nations and regions of the UK."

Although it was disappointing that the scheme would not go as far as Swansea, he added: "It would have been completely unacceptable for Wales to have been left out of the UK's rail modernisation plans".

Cardiff council leader Rodney Berman - who lobbied for electrification of the Great Western line with Swindon and Bristol councils - said: "Today's decision has followed a lot of effort stressing the benefits electrification will bring."

Plaid Cymru parliamentary leader Elfyn Llwyd said: "Labour left Wales as the only country in Europe alongside Albania and Moldova without a single mile of electrified track."

Peter Black, Lib Dem AM for south Wales west, said the announcement was a big step forward, but added: "This decision sends the wrong message to business investors about the south west Wales economy."
Also included with the story is a video news report as seen earlier on BBC Wales Today.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40783



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #565 on: March 01, 2011, 20:58:41 »

Quote
Plaid Cymru parliamentary leader Elfyn Llwyd said: "Labour left Wales as the only country in Europe alongside Albania and Moldova without a single mile of electrified track."

Andorra?  Vatican? 
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6298


View Profile
« Reply #566 on: March 01, 2011, 21:04:17 »

Looking back to the first post on this thread in July 2009, I have to say that there is little difference in the electrification plans as announced then excepting that Cardiff is in from the start.
From what I can see the only difference is Swansea is removed from receiving the wires. Gosh that's going to save soooooo much money in the grand scheme of things isn't it...not!

Whats the bet that in the end the Network Rail electrification team will continue beyond Cardiff to Swansea because all of a sudden the money has been found to finish the job. You heard it here first if it does happen  Wink
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #567 on: March 01, 2011, 21:17:14 »

Quote
Plaid Cymru parliamentary leader Elfyn Llwyd said: "Labour left Wales as the only country in Europe alongside Albania and Moldova without a single mile of electrified track."

Andorra?  Vatican? 

Northern Ireland?
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Zoe
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 746


View Profile
« Reply #568 on: March 01, 2011, 21:33:44 »

Northern Ireland?
That would count as part of the UK (United Kingdom).
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #569 on: March 01, 2011, 21:36:16 »

The Plaid AM referred to Wales as a country, so Northern Ireland is a fair comparison.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page