Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum
GWR advice (Project Phoenix)
Forum in and beyond Coronavirus
Great Western Coffee Shop
[home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Coffee Shop 19:30 Zoom, ONLINE
18/08/20 - Tuesday Club - ONLINE
24/08/20 - Challenge of Decarb. - ONLINE
16/09/20 - Melksham Rail User Group
Random Image
Train Running Polls Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
August 13, 2020, 03:19:34 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[88] HST derailment, near Stonehaven, 12th August 2020
[47] West Somerset Railway - heritage line, Bishops Lydeard to Mine...
[44] 12th August 2020 - On line Webinar, Metroisation of the Railwa...
[36] Exeter Airport - Sat 04/07 Resumption Of Commercial Flights (C...
[34] Cotswold Line - 2020 cancellation and amendments log
[30] Electrification of freight traffic
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Electrification of freight traffic  (Read 684 times)
Electric train
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3296


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: Yesterday at 12:05:43 pm »


I think that the problem is in the specification of the class 92. 4MW off the third rail!

What might have been done is to provide emulator software like the class 91's (they can pretend to be any of the class 8X's!) so that they could substitute easily. If a 92 could pretend to be one or perhaps two 73's at most....

There's something called conductor line index, basically one unit per EE507 /185kW motor, so a 12 car unit = 12 (a REP consist = 14), a 73 = 8. The maximum allowed was 16 - a 92 powering would be over 32!

Perhaps there turned out to be too little freight to bother.

OTC

Basically yes.

There are areas in the Southern where double head 73 on third rail is not permitted.

The typical route setting (DC Protection setting) is for 4kA (3MW) High current railway can go to 6kA (4.5MW) the former Eurostar routes are high current railways.

High current railway needs to have 4kA rated circuit breakers with impedance protection the old falling voltage protection is not adequate, the track feeder cables need to be doubled to two 1000mm sq aluminium cables and the hook switches removed.  The rectifiers also need uprating to 3.5MW class G

There are still a lot of the older 2.5kA rated DC circuit breakers on the network these in the most part are ok at 4kA route setting

You can see why people think 25kV OLE is the future

Agreed, but there is still a limitation on the current draw through the OLE, 300A 7.5MW which is the typical rating, bare in mind OLE electrical section are much longer than DC so the number of trains in section become the limit
Logged

Neither a wise man nor a brave man lies down on the tracks of history to wait for the train of the future to run over him.     
Dwight D. Eisenhower
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 804


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 06:30:12 pm »

As the channel tunnel only generated about 20% of the freight forecast, perhaps we should look to Southampton's 21 daily departures, many times that of Dollands Moor.

The idea of 25kV to Basingstoke was a very narrowly focused idea, neglecting the existing dc infrastructure. This dated firstly from the 1967 Pirbright Jn (a reasonable boundary for local trains) - Bournemouth dc scheme and was/is questionable for such a fast, long, high capacity line and has limitations in  powering services at its extremity. Wiring it would involve about c300km of track, 600M, and would also need to go North from Didcot.

Decarbonising freight means sorting out lots of other services.

Lateral thinking needed.

OTC



Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page