Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 03:35 20 Apr 2024
- Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
05:15 Plymouth to Penzance
19:19 Carmarthen to Swansea
Short Run
07:22 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
14:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
18:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
21:07 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
06:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2024, 03:42:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[276] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[265] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[45] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[40] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[19] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[18] Signage - not making it easy ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 114
  Print  
Author Topic: HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general discussion  (Read 397703 times)
TonyN
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 471



View Profile
« Reply #990 on: June 12, 2020, 12:40:11 »

Well if they cancel HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) now we will have the worlds largest and most expensive Bat cave.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #991 on: June 12, 2020, 13:18:30 »

Well if they cancel HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) now we will have the worlds largest and most expensive Bat cave.

Unlikely, the UK (United Kingdom) Government see it as a major investment part of their getting the economy moving; the construction will employ a lot of people either directly or indirectly.

The new north of Watford Conservative MP (Member of Parliament)'s will have little concern for the Home Counties that HS2 with speed through, as they will see it as part of the levelling up
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 548


View Profile
« Reply #992 on: June 12, 2020, 17:50:12 »


I would have gone for Times Roman.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #993 on: June 12, 2020, 17:57:30 »


Talking of tunnels from times Roman ...  https://www.livescience.com/41559-rome-quarry-collapse.html
(sorry - been a very serious-topic afternoon)

Quote
Deep under the streets and buildings of Rome is a maze of tunnels and quarries that dates back to the very beginning of this ancient city. Now, geologists are venturing beneath Rome to map these underground passageways, hoping to prevent modern structures from crumbling into the voids below.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #994 on: June 12, 2020, 18:04:07 »


It's a whopping great cutting for a two track railway.

It looks like the designers work in feet, the contractors in metres.

OTC
Logged
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 548


View Profile
« Reply #995 on: June 12, 2020, 18:07:35 »

Quote
Talking of tunnels from times Roman ...  https://www.livescience.com/41559-rome-quarry-collapse.html
(sorry - been a very serious-topic afternoon)

An interesting article.  I seem to remember the same thing happening in Bath.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #996 on: June 12, 2020, 18:56:07 »



And so would I! Calibri at a push.
Logged

Now, please!
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #997 on: June 12, 2020, 19:21:41 »

A couple of points...

The collapsing ancient tunnels in Rome and Bath has also happened in parts of Paris. It's also build on easily tunnelled rock which happens to be the original source of Plaster of Paris...

When my wife and I were living there some twenty five years ago there were several stories of holes suddenly appearing and buildings cracking. In fact the same thing occurred in Reading about twenty years ago when part of Field Road suddenly dropped into previously unknown chalk mines. The story can be found at <https://www.getreading.co.uk/news/local-news/victorian-brickmaker-responsible-field-road-4197053>

My other point, more pertinent to this HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) thread, concerns the station to be built on the Great Western Main Line at OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) to permit connections to be made between HS2 and GW (Great Western) services, in particular to and from the HEx services.

This link has come about because the dedicated HS2 spur to Heathrow would not have been economic for a variety of reasons so connections to Heathrow every 15 minutes would solve the issue of traffic flows from Birmingham (and points north) to Heathrow. See the Atkins Demand and Appraisal Report dated 2012, to be found here <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/370118/Demand_and_Appraisal_Report_London-West_Midlands.pdf>.

So far, so good. When this was first proposed some ten years ago the density of trains on the Mains into and out of Paddington would have made it just possible to stop the HEx trains without too great a knock-on effect on the main line trains.

However the very tight scheduling and additional trains in the 2019 timetable now means that if the HEx trains stop then all the trains using the Mains will have to stop even though all the platforms will have two faces for each line. The stop will cost about 4 minutes in running time.  

Figure 5.3 of the Demand and Appraisal Report shows user benefits for the HS2 stretching out to Reading. As I read it there are no user benefits from HS2 accruing to passengers travelling to or originating from towns and cities further west.

To my mind this seems to me to be a case of the tail waging the dog as every passenger travelling to Paddington using the long distance high speed services (aka InterCity... Wink) will have his or her journey lengthened simply to benefit some HS2 passengers.

I hope that I am incorrect in my analysis, but it wasn't in the HS2 prospectus that the construction of HS2 would mean that all GWR (Great Western Railway) expresses would be decelerated.
Logged
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 548


View Profile
« Reply #998 on: June 12, 2020, 22:34:00 »

It has been commented elsewhere that many intercity passengers who will be travelling on with Crossrail will find it quicker and less crowded to join Crossrail at OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) and not Paddington.  Apart from that I agree with you as speeds to Birmingham from West of Reading will not improve with HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)).
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #999 on: June 13, 2020, 08:24:19 »


It's a whopping great cutting for a two track railway.

It looks like the designers work in feet, the contractors in metres.

OTC

Remember it will be twin bore 8.8m internal diameter 20m apart.

I suspect when finished there will be high speed crossovers in the area outside the portals also there will be a number of service buildings
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #1000 on: June 13, 2020, 12:32:04 »

It has been commented elsewhere that many intercity passengers who will be travelling on with Crossrail will find it quicker and less crowded to join Crossrail at OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) and not Paddington.  Apart from that I agree with you as speeds to Birmingham from West of Reading will not improve with HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)).
I've also seen this suggested but the rough calculation I've done shows this argument to be spurious.

Each Crossrail train can carry 1,500 passengers and in the peaks there will be 24 of these per hour - 36,000 people per hour. By Atkins’ calculations (Table 4.2 of the Demand and Appraisal Report) some 37% of HS2 passengers will change at OOC - a total of 55,800 per day to the West Midlands (and by implication in the reverse direction) or an average of 3,000 per hour in each direction over an 18 hour day.

Even assuming that all these passengers change onto inbound Crossrail trains that’s still only two Crossrail trains' worth per hour. One can expect to double or triple that volume for the full ‘Y’-shaped HS2 network - but that’s still only 6 trains full per hour. A certain percentage of the flow off HS2 will travel westbound from OOC as the User Benefit maps suggest so the eastbound loadings will be slightly lower than the numbers I gave above. It seems to me that even allowing for the expected loads from the western suburbs there will be room on Crossrail for passengers changing at Paddington on inward journeys. In the peak hours one does not necessarily expect a seat on the Tube so I don't to see why this should be a consideration on Crossrail. In any event Crossrail journeys through London will be quick so one will not have to stand for long: 4 minutes to Tottenham Court Road and 17 minutes to Canary Wharf.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1001 on: June 13, 2020, 13:27:11 »

Even assuming that all these passengers change onto inbound Crossrail trains that’s still only two Crossrail trains' worth per hour. One can expect to double or triple that volume for the full ‘Y’-shaped HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) network - but that’s still only 6 trains full per hour. A certain percentage of the flow off HS2 will travel westbound from OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) as the User Benefit maps suggest so the eastbound loadings will be slightly lower than the numbers I gave above. It seems to me that even allowing for the expected loads from the western suburbs there will be room on Crossrail for passengers changing at Paddington on inward journeys. In the peak hours one does not necessarily expect a seat on the Tube so I don't to see why this should be a consideration on Crossrail. In any event Crossrail journeys through London will be quick so one will not have to stand for long: 4 minutes to Tottenham Court Road and 17 minutes to Canary Wharf.

The current method of making it into central London is to head for Paddington, then go for a nice walk with a few thousand other people to the tube. A change of platform at OOC is going to be so much easier.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2020, 09:40:23 by TonyK » Logged

Now, please!
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #1002 on: June 13, 2020, 23:30:17 »

Even assuming that all these passengers change onto inbound Crossrail trains that’s still only two Crossrail trains' worth per hour. One can expect to double or triple that volume for the full ‘Y’-shaped HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) network - but that’s still only 6 trains full per hour. A certain percentage of the flow off HS2 will travel westbound from OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) as the User Benefit maps suggest so the eastbound loadings will be slightly lower than the numbers I gave above. It seems to me that even allowing for the expected loads from the western suburbs there will be room on Crossrail for passengers changing at Paddington on inward journeys. In the peak hours one does not necessarily expect a seat on the Tube so I don't to see why this should be a consideration on Crossrail. In any event Crossrail journeys through London will be quick so one will not have to stand for long: 4 minutes to Tottenham Court Road and 17 minutes to Canary Wharf.
The current method of making it into central London is to head for Paddington, then go for a nice wwalk with a few thousand other people to the tube. A change of platform at OOC is going to be so much easier.

And long may it continue...!

However reaching the Crossrail platforms at Paddington will be a whole new experience. Walk towards the Lawn, pass the barriers and turn right. The entrance to Crossrail will be through the arches where the GWR (Great Western Railway)'s booking hall used to be located beside the taxi set-down road alongside Eastbourne Terrace and then down escalators, stairs or lifts to the Crossrail platforms. The Crossrail platforms are under Eastbourne Terrace.

It will be closer than any of the existing tube or sub-surface platforms. Platform 1 arrivals will have it best of all, it will be right alongside.

Edit: corrected quotes.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2020, 23:41:18 by 4064ReadingAbbey » Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #1003 on: June 14, 2020, 08:37:24 »

Even assuming that all these passengers change onto inbound Crossrail trains that’s still only two Crossrail trains' worth per hour. One can expect to double or triple that volume for the full ‘Y’-shaped HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) network - but that’s still only 6 trains full per hour. A certain percentage of the flow off HS2 will travel westbound from OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) as the User Benefit maps suggest so the eastbound loadings will be slightly lower than the numbers I gave above. It seems to me that even allowing for the expected loads from the western suburbs there will be room on Crossrail for passengers changing at Paddington on inward journeys. In the peak hours one does not necessarily expect a seat on the Tube so I don't to see why this should be a consideration on Crossrail. In any event Crossrail journeys through London will be quick so one will not have to stand for long: 4 minutes to Tottenham Court Road and 17 minutes to Canary Wharf.

The current method of making it into central London is to head for Paddington, then go for a nice wwalk with a few thousand other people to the tube. A change of platform at OOC is going to be so much easier.

As we are talking HS2 the area it covers is mainly passengers heading to Euston and not Paddington.

Even assuming that all these passengers change onto inbound Crossrail trains that’s still only two Crossrail trains' worth per hour. One can expect to double or triple that volume for the full ‘Y’-shaped HS2 network - but that’s still only 6 trains full per hour. A certain percentage of the flow off HS2 will travel westbound from OOC as the User Benefit maps suggest so the eastbound loadings will be slightly lower than the numbers I gave above. It seems to me that even allowing for the expected loads from the western suburbs there will be room on Crossrail for passengers changing at Paddington on inward journeys. In the peak hours one does not necessarily expect a seat on the Tube so I don't to see why this should be a consideration on Crossrail. In any event Crossrail journeys through London will be quick so one will not have to stand for long: 4 minutes to Tottenham Court Road and 17 minutes to Canary Wharf.
The current method of making it into central London is to head for Paddington, then go for a nice wwalk with a few thousand other people to the tube. A change of platform at OOC is going to be so much easier.

And long may it continue...!

However reaching the Crossrail platforms at Paddington will be a whole new experience. Walk towards the Lawn, pass the barriers and turn right. The entrance to Crossrail will be through the arches where the GWR (Great Western Railway)'s booking hall used to be located beside the taxi set-down road alongside Eastbourne Terrace and then down escalators, stairs or lifts to the Crossrail platforms. The Crossrail platforms are under Eastbourne Terrace.

It will be closer than any of the existing tube or sub-surface platforms. Platform 1 arrivals will have it best of all, it will be right alongside.

Edit: corrected quotes.

Its quite likely a number of trains to / from the West will call at OOC for the interchange with both HS2 and Crossrail
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1004 on: June 14, 2020, 14:12:06 »



And long may it continue...!

However reaching the Crossrail platforms at Paddington will be a whole new experience. Walk towards the Lawn, pass the barriers and turn right. The entrance to Crossrail will be through the arches where the GWR (Great Western Railway)'s booking hall used to be located beside the taxi set-down road alongside Eastbourne Terrace and then down escalators, stairs or lifts to the Crossrail platforms. The Crossrail platforms are under Eastbourne Terrace.

It will be closer than any of the existing tube or sub-surface platforms. Platform 1 arrivals will have it best of all, it will be right alongside.


True, and I will still do that occasionally, but I had in mind the occasions when my ultimate destination was closer to Tottenham Court Road, or if I was heading for my sister's in Norwich, via Liverpool Street.
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 114
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page