Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:35 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 14:46:06 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[135] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[85] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[36] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[34] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[33] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 53 54 [55] 56 57 ... 114
  Print  
Author Topic: HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general discussion  (Read 394099 times)
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #810 on: September 23, 2019, 21:34:21 »

So how much would the Borders Railway have cost per mile with knitting at the same time it was re-instated?

The Borders Railway is, of course, the least apple-like of the projects I compared.

IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) borders railway did not include long lengths of new tunnel or work in dense urban areas and land values for any land purchases were probably a tad less that extending Euston Station. 

Indeed. There were some fairly substantial civils at the Edinburgh end where it crossed the A720, but after that the route and some significant structures were there for the recycling. Also - very significantly - the cost of new (or not-so-new, as it happens) trains (which can constitute a very significant chunk of the budget for this kind of project) were not, as far as I am aware, factored in.

If it's cancelled, I will be very interested to see how the alternative plan to tackle future rail growth takes shape...

That's the crux of the biscuit. It may be that there is another way of knitting together the maze of Stephensonian cart-tracks that currently struggle to hold England together - when Ulster, Scotland and Wales have left the union we may need it more than ever - but if we cancel HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)), it'll be a generation before there's any prospect of getting it moving. And as TonyK pointed out elsewhere, it would be unlikely to cost less than twice what we're now looking at for HS2.

Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #811 on: September 23, 2019, 22:36:03 »

I do wonder if there is any sum of money at which the HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) fan club would eventually admit that it's too much.

Since you put it like that...

On the anti HS2 side we have:

1. the nimbys who don't want a new railway in their back yard (though I think most of them would find it a lot less intrusive than they think)
2. the anti rail transport zealots who just hate railways (followers of the Thatcher view of public transport - which they regard as socialist because they have to mix with the plebs or because they run a road transport business) - Is the SoS in this group?
3. and some who just think it will cost too much and won't do anything for them.

Groups 1 & 2 don't care about the cost they are united in that they just don't want it.  However propose a new motorway instead and they would be fighting each other to death.  I suspect the Daily Telegraph are representing the views of groups 1 & 2 and are just trying to use the legitimate concerns of group 3 to bring the project down.   

Logged
lympstone_commuter
Transport Scholar
Full Member
******
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #812 on: September 24, 2019, 09:12:42 »

I do wonder if there is any sum of money at which the HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) fan club would eventually admit that it's too much.

A good question put in a slightly patronising way.


Indeed. "How much is too much?" is a good and interesting question. The answer may be complex, and there is always a danger that costs can be made to 'seem' large, or 'seem' small according to people's pre-existing views and how they choose to frame the numbers.

As an example, expenditure of £1bn can be made to sound large (by calling it £1bn!), but it is (approximately) equivalent to £20 per person in the UK (United Kingdom) (which doesn't sound nearly so bad), or 40p per week per person in the UK (which sounds positively affordable).

I find that '£1bn is twenty quid a head' is a good ready reckoner to carry around in one's head.

So - what to make of the cost of HS2? Let's work with a round £100bn.

£100bn is - roughly - 1 year's total UK govt education spending, or 3 year's total UK govt transport spending (see  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_spending_in_the_United_Kingdom  ), or Network Rail's total budget for about 14 years ( https://cdn.networkrail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Annual-report-and-accounts-2019.pdf ) . To put it another way - it is roughly 10% of annual UK govt spending.

£100bn is - roughly - £2000 per person, or £40 per person per week over a year, or £4 per person per week over a decade, or 80p per person per week over half a century. So - near enough 10p per person per day for the next 50 years.....

Is that too much?  Well, I suppose it depends on the benefits - which I don't feel qualified to quantify, but must surely include uplift in GDP due to greater connectivity, north-south rebalancing of the economy and savings from work that would otherwise have to be done on WCML (West Coast Main Line) / MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) / ECML (East Coast Main Line) to provide capacity.

My own (current) hunch is that HS2 is well worth it. Does anyone have any quantitative arguments to suggest that it isn't?



Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #813 on: September 24, 2019, 09:51:59 »

But how do we know that figure is correct? 

We don't. The only way of finding out what it costs is to build it. Even then, we won't know. Should we include the cost of the trains? After all, in a supposedly privatised railway, somebody else is paying for them. Do we include the cost of the stations, and if so should we add in the cost of the W H Smiths at Curzon Street? I suppose the answer depends on whether you want to build it or not. Truth and accuracy are scarce commodities these days.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2019, 11:32:47 by TonyK » Logged

Now, please!
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #814 on: September 24, 2019, 11:38:21 »

By the looks of it m not the only one who would like to see the return of Yes Minister 😁


Groups 1 & 2 don't care about the cost they are united in that they just don't want it.  However propose a new motorway instead and they would be fighting each other to death.  I suspect the Daily Telegraph are representing the views of groups 1 & 2 and are just trying to use the legitimate concerns of group 3 to bring the project down.   

So:
The Telegraph is read by the people whose stately homes will be demolished for HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))
The Daily Mail is read by the wives of the people whose stately homes will be demolished for HS2
The Financial Times is read by the people who will own HS2
The Guardian is read by the people who think HS2 should be owned by the country
The Morning Star is read by people who think HS2 should be owned by another country
The Mirror is read by people who think it already is
The Star is read by people who don't have a clue what we're talking about
The Times is read by people who will enjoy doing the crossword on HS2
And The Sun is read by people who don't care either way, so long as the train staff have big knockers.

« Last Edit: September 24, 2019, 12:19:17 by Red Squirrel » Logged

Now, please!
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #815 on: September 24, 2019, 12:23:36 »

And (sorry to lower the tone!) the Express?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #816 on: September 24, 2019, 14:06:16 »

The Express is read by people who think HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) killed Diana.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Celestial
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 674


View Profile
« Reply #817 on: September 24, 2019, 14:39:44 »

and the Evening Standard is read by those that think HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) should end at Watford (despite not even going there.)
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7750



View Profile
« Reply #818 on: September 24, 2019, 18:36:55 »



Well, the messenger is riddled with bullets, but strangely enough the message seems unscathed!  Wink



Still not even a scratch!   Cheesy
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #819 on: September 24, 2019, 18:54:25 »

Should we include the cost of the trains?

I'd be interested to know what other 'optional extras' included in Michael Byng's submission to the enquiry.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #820 on: September 24, 2019, 19:22:32 »



Well, the messenger is riddled with bullets, but strangely enough the message seems unscathed!  Wink



Still not even a scratch!   Cheesy

OK, how about if we turned this on its head: How low would you have to reduce the price before the anti-HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) camp agreed that it was money worth spending?

Perhaps if we excluded the cost of stations, or land acquisition - these are after all assets, and will actually be worth more than the cost of building them. The trains will, presumably, be leased; their cost will be defrayed at least to some extent by ticket revenue won't it?

What is the message that is unscathed? I think we all agree that it is possible to make up a number which seems absurdly unaffordable, but where does that get us? What is the alternative?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #821 on: September 24, 2019, 23:23:33 »

So:
The Telegraph is read by the people whose stately homes will be demolished for HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))
The Daily Mail is read by the wives of the people whose stately homes will be demolished for HS2
The Financial Times is read by the people who will own HS2
The Guardian is read by the people who think HS2 should be owned by the country
The Morning Star is read by people who think HS2 should be owned by another country
The Mirror is read by people who think it already is
The Star is read by people who don't have a clue what we're talking about
The Times is read by people who will enjoy doing the crossword on HS2
And The Sun is read by people who don't care either way, so long as the train staff have big knockers.

The late 1960s called. They'd like their joke back...

(I was actually given a typewritten copy of that gag when I lived in a bedsit in Wells Road, Totterdown, Bristol, between 1970 and 1972. The only difference was a substitution of the word knockers for a word that was in more widely-used parlance at the time Wink )
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #822 on: September 25, 2019, 01:41:35 »

(I was actually given a typewritten copy of that gag when I lived in a bedsit in Wells Road, Totterdown, Bristol, between 1970 and 1972. The only difference was a substitution of the word knockers for a word that was in more widely-used parlance at the time Wink)
The late 1960s called. They'd like their joke back...

Are you saying that the joke was written around 20 years before it was broadcast in the 1987 Yes, Prime Minister episode, A Conflict of Interest? Did the typewritten copy you saw attribute  the joke to Anthony Jay and Jonathan Lynn?

I'm sceptical that the joke originated in the late 60s as The Sun didn't start publishing pictures of topless women on page three until November 1970.

I also can't find any source online that suggests the joke has been around since the late 1960s. All the sources I've found attribute the joke to Jay and Lynn for that particular episode of Yes, Prime Minister.

Your typewritten copy of said joke could be worth a bit of money if it proves Jay and Lynn plagiarised it. Wink
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #823 on: September 25, 2019, 09:59:03 »

The 'newspapers and their readers' joke was not original to Yes Minister; Dave Allen for one did something along those lines on TV in the early 1970s. Jay and Lynn discovered it by reading the quote in a media handling book. They may well have repurposed it though.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #824 on: September 25, 2019, 10:21:32 »

The 'newspapers and their readers' joke was not original to Yes Minister; Dave Allen for one did something along those lines on TV in the early 1970s. Jay and Lynn discovered it by reading the quote in a media handling book. They may well have repurposed it though.

Thanks. The dangers of online only research. Sometimes Google isn't omniscient.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 53 54 [55] 56 57 ... 114
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page