Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:08 Newbury to Bedwyn
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:32:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[64] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[59] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[58] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[52] Return of the BRUTE?
[36] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Extra morning train  (Read 8445 times)
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« on: September 15, 2009, 21:12:24 »

Despite insisting earlier in the year that the 08.58 from Malvern had adequate capacity when operated by a Turbo, what do I find in the December timetable but an 09.29 from Moreton-in-Marsh to London, calling at Kingham and Charlbury only to Oxford, where it picks up the path of the current 10.07 stopper. However, by changing at Didcot, a Paddington arrival at 11.13 is possible.

Off-peak tickets appear to be valid, if the LM (London Midland - recent franchise) booking system is to be trusted.

This is not some blip in the system, I have had it confirmed that the train is going to run, though I'm not clear how the stock is getting to moreton, whether on the back of the previous train from Oxford, or ecs.

The 8.58 continues to operate as now, with the same calls.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2009, 22:05:05 »

Would it not make more sense to call this new train at Hanborough, and cut the Hanborough stop from the 0858?

As for Off Peak availability, I would not trust LM (London Midland - recent franchise)!
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2009, 22:48:59 »

No. You would lose the opportunity for people from further west to travel to Hanborough - not many do, but it does happen. Also, it would be hard to fit in a stop because the 8.58 will leave Moreton only 21 minutes behind it, so there isn't the time in hand for the first train to make a stop and ensure it is clear of the single-line section at Wolvercot by the time the 8.58 reaches Ascott.

As a relief train, it's clearly targeted at easing the pressure at the places where it is most obvious and the three stations which will be served can easily produce 100-120 passengers for the 8.58 on busy days, whereas Hanborough is typically 15-20 people. In any case, it should make using the 8.58 a more pleasant experience for those joining in Worcestershire, even if it is still a Turbo.

Not everyone will switch to the earlier service, as they won't want to change at Didcot if off to London, but some will appreciate the opportunity to get to Paddington before 11.30 while the return of an Oxford arrival just after 10am is certainly popular with me - and will be with others.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2009, 23:23:23 »

I suppose. Strange for Oxford slows to be entering the Cotswold line. I can see the benefits for Oxford commuters and taking relief off the first Off Peak train, but let's hope it's not a long term plan - esp for the Worcester trains.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2009, 00:27:13 »

It's probably one of the few things that can be done to improve matters while the single-line sections still constrain operations and makes sense if it's using a train that would otherwise just be sat in Oxford sidings for an hour - which is the same way they would be providing stock for any extra short workings post-redoubling.

Also does something to plug a yawning hole in services, for at least part of the line, in the same way the mid-afternoon train out to moreton which started last December does. And remember, in the past, short workings, notably in mid-evening, have been tried out as far as Moreton, then extended on to Worcester. If this service works out, then it may well help shape the post-morning peak timetable from spring 2011 for everyone's benefit.
Logged
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2009, 08:43:52 »

Great news, Thanks Will for pointing this out. I used to rely on the 0938 from Charlbury a couple of days a week, the change to 1008 has really stuffed my work schedule so anything to claw back some of this has to be worthwhile. If it reduces the passenger crowding then also to the good.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2009, 11:03:32 »

If it reduces the passenger crowding then also to the good.

That's the key point. Hopefully the 08:58 will still couple up to an empty set at Oxford.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2009, 22:53:32 »

If it reduces the passenger crowding then also to the good.

That's the key point. Hopefully the 08:58 will still couple up to an empty set at Oxford.

Shame this train (the 1008 from Charlbury) was cancelled last monday (according to CBY station staff) and today there wasnt a turbo waiting at Oxford to couple up to in order to relieve overcrowding. In both cased severe overcrowding again.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2009, 22:58:06 »

The Monday cancellation was because the train got caught up by signal problems after overrunning overnight engineering work, so was halted at Oxford and never got to Worcestershire, so as not to mess up the peak trains heading towards Oxford.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2009, 08:59:40 »

The Monday cancellation was because the train got caught up by signal problems after overrunning overnight engineering work, so was halted at Oxford and never got to Worcestershire, so as not to mess up the peak trains heading towards Oxford.

And there was absolutely no effort made to run the empty set to either Evesham (coupled to the rear of the following train) or Moreton (as an ECS (Empty Coaching Stock)) to at least provide some passengers on the route with a train on this busy service.  Undecided
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2010, 14:05:56 »

Reviving an old thread merely to respond to the point Insider made about the 8.58. Travelled on it on thursday after the 9.29 from Moreton was cancelled due to staff shortages and yes, it does still couple to an extra set at Oxford.

Though it was a bit of a push-me pull-you performance due to snow in the coupling, which seemed to have involved use of a brush to assist efforts to get a proper electrical connection before we could get off. At least the duty manager was stood there next to the driving cabs with a brush in his hand when the doors finally opened.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2010, 16:05:48 »

A big bucket of hot water chucked strategically over the coupling pins also does the trick quite well!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 10, 2010, 19:12:15 »

That's what someone else stood there had a mop bucket for then...
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2010, 20:55:20 »

Indeed: high tech equipment for the modern railway!



 Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page