Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:55 29 Mar 2024
- Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 14:09:39 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
  Print  
Author Topic: Remove First Class?  (Read 22327 times)
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: September 24, 2009, 08:51:50 »

On the market segmentation point, you can (and do) of course have this even without the class split (AP vs Open return, season tickets, cheaper fares for the young and old and groups) and I am sure that when used properly it dpes lead to greater passenger numbers and overall revenue increases. 

1. Deliberate nobbling of the lower-cost option to preserve the difference of the premium product. It has certainly happened with computer printers, but has it happened with rail? One example might be the exclusion of passengers on standard tickets from dining. I'm sure someone can think of better examples.

Has this happened?  SC has improved in some ways (at seat sockets for example).  The only major worsening of SC accomodation has been less room per seat - perhaps the existance of FC(resolve) has something to do with this.


2. Compromises in rolling stock design. Ever since the Mk3 coach was designed, pax in standard have had to put up with obstructed views as the bodyshell was designed for proper seat/window alignment in first.

I've never realised this before!  Of course the orginal Mk3 was far better for SC window alignment than almost anything since.   
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2009, 11:24:27 »

On the question of seat alingment Ian Walmsley came up with a novel solution in one of his recent Modern Railways articles.

As a great advocate of loco hauled trains rather than glorified multiple units (IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)), he came up with a coach designed based on seating modules with a window. Thus First was wider than standard each coach then had so many modules to make it around 23 mtrs (not 26 as IEP). But the first and standard coaches would be slightly different lengths.

His argument is that with modern contruction techniques and the number of each required (+ 1000 first) the cost of construction would be very similar. You then stick a 4MW plus electric on the front until the wires run out and 2MW diesel comes on for the rest of the journey maybe leaving some coaches behind.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2009, 17:24:27 by eightf48544 » Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2009, 12:16:09 »

I doubt that I would use the train if first class was abolished.

Reading passengers who dont approve of first class should use the local services that have no first class.

Some trains are very overcrowded in both first and standard, but in many cases standard seats are available, however the "Reading sheep" prefer to travell towards the London end of the train, and in many cases seats are available towards the country end.

What we really need are longer trains, not the costly, complicated, route restricted, IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.), but proper full length locomotive hauled trains, with diesel or electric locos being used as required.
As few as 6 full length loco hauled sets (plus a maintenance spare) would greatly improve matters and could be introduced  quickly.

Use of a 12 car loco hauled set on the busiest six  HST (High Speed Train) diagrams would very substantialy increase seating capacity.
The gain would not be restricted to the trips served by the locohauled sets, since 6 HSTs would be freed for use in place of the 6 most crowded DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) diagrams.
This in turn would free 6 or more DMUs, for lengthening the worst crowded DMU diagrams.

Therefore the relatively modest cost of obtaining 7 locohauled sets would benifit a large number of customers.
This will not require years of research and development, hauled coaches, diesel locos and electric locos are matures technologies, available from various supplies.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18896



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2009, 12:43:49 »

Quote

Reading passengers who dont approve of first class should use the local services that have no first class.



I think you'll find that even the local services, operated using class 165/166, have a first class section. No leather seats, power points or at-seat service though.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2009, 12:52:16 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2009, 12:56:16 »

Use of a 12 car loco hauled set on the busiest six  HST (High Speed Train) diagrams would very substantialy increase seating capacity.

And it would very substantially increase journey times. Lower top speed and poor acceleration. I remember the days when the Wessex Scot used to struggle out of Oxford with it's 11 or 12 coaches in the days when it used to split at Carstairs.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
jane s
Full Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2009, 15:43:28 »

Personally I am in favour of reducing the number of first-class carriages/seats to the level where supply equals average demand for the route & time of day (meaning that in the very few cases where it is full, they will have to wait a few minutes for the next train - in which the carriage will be empty!)

On the turbos, I have noticed that some sets have first-class at both ends, and others at only one - why?

Also, on 6-car trains, this also means that they may, or may not, have first class at both ends AND in the middle - some of which are almost completely empty (until you get to Hayes/Southall where they fill up with standard-class passengers who couldn't care less if they are disturbing genuine first-class people who have paid for their tickets.)

Also there is no consistency whatsoever about the formation - in no circumstances should the first-class ever be at the end pointing away from London, because this is the end that is generally standing room only in Standard, causing the over-spill.

So - make sure there is only ever ONE first-class section in a 3-car unit, please!

As for the inter-city trains, I don't use them very often, but again there generally seem to be too many first-class carriages at the expense of standard.
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2009, 16:14:59 »

Personally I am in favour of reducing the number of first-class carriages/seats to the level where supply equals average demand for the route & time of day (meaning that in the very few cases where it is full, they will have to wait a few minutes for the next train - in which the carriage will be empty!)

On the turbos, I have noticed that some sets have first-class at both ends, and others at only one - why?

Also, on 6-car trains, this also means that they may, or may not, have first class at both ends AND in the middle - some of which are almost completely empty (until you get to Hayes/Southall where they fill up with standard-class passengers who couldn't care less if they are disturbing genuine first-class people who have paid for their tickets.)

Also there is no consistency whatsoever about the formation - in no circumstances should the first-class ever be at the end pointing away from London, because this is the end that is generally standing room only in Standard, causing the over-spill.

So - make sure there is only ever ONE first-class section in a 3-car unit, please!

As for the inter-city trains, I don't use them very often, but again there generally seem to be too many first-class carriages at the expense of standard.

I'm not an expert but since they dont split HST (High Speed Train) sets during the day - its almost impossible I believe to fiddle with the first class carriages in that way

The difference is a 165/166 on the local services - please dont insist they are all 165 units for the love of all that is holy.

To be honest, unless a ticket examiner gets on a local service, you may as well say they are all standard class .....


Also - Why SHOULD first class have to wait for the next train so standard can get on the current one?  Kind of brings into question the idea of first class.

Of course the griping is usually from people who cant afford first class............... no surprise there then
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2009, 16:40:36 »


Of course the griping is usually from people who cant afford first class............... no surprise there then

 Roll Eyes
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2009, 17:25:24 »

Use of a 12 car loco hauled set on the busiest six  HST (High Speed Train) diagrams would very substantialy increase seating capacity.

And it would very substantially increase journey times. Lower top speed and poor acceleration. I remember the days when the Wessex Scot used to struggle out of Oxford with it's 11 or 12 coaches in the days when it used to split at Carstairs.

Would the performance be much reduced ? I was thinking of class 67s or something based on that design, top speed of 125.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: September 24, 2009, 17:31:42 »

Top speed isn't the issue, it's acceleration/deceleration that take up the time. An HST (High Speed Train) on one power car can still, I believe, make it up to 125 mph eventually but because it only has half the horsepower it would normally the acceleration is much reduced, and consequently journey time increased.

A 67 has 3200 hp, but an HST on both power cars has about 4500 hp under the bonnet (correct me if I'm wrong, somebody!). So if you put a 67 on a heavier load than an HST (12 vs 8 ) you're definitely going to slow things down considerably. Having the power concentrated in just one place also increases the risk of problems with traction/wheelslip. Indeed, HSTs themselves have problems with adhesion sometimes, take a look at this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3CJPgn7moo&feature=player_embedded

Differently formed HST sets to respond to first class demand during the day are a non-starter. Firstly, it's not a straightforward business to split and re-marshal an HST (take a look at all the air connections and electrical jumpers between the vehicles next time you see one). And, as we saw with 2+7 buffet-less sets travelling PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-PNZ, sooner or later something will go wrong with the service and you'll end up with set allocation completely screwed up!
« Last Edit: September 24, 2009, 19:11:14 by inspector_blakey » Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: September 24, 2009, 19:12:28 »

They've ruined our education system by using this logic:- if you can't improve the worst, then destroy the best !!!!!!

Hear hear.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2009, 19:22:22 »

Must agree. Grammar schools ought to stay  Cheesy
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: September 24, 2009, 19:35:16 »

Lucky, they all went in Worcestershire in the 80s. Angry Plenty cling on in Birmingham though, but they are HEAVILY subscribed to from most of the surrounding counties who lost out.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: September 24, 2009, 20:05:36 »

Would the performance be much reduced ? I was thinking of class 67s or something based on that design, top speed of 125.

Wouldn't they be limited to 110 mph max anyway with ordinary Mk3 rolling stock?  Also, where are all these coaches going to come from? You want 84 (for 7 + 1 spare sets), and IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) from that competion commission report a while back, there is nothing like that number available. WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) and GC» (Great Central Railway - link to heritage line) before them were scraping the bottom of the barrel, I thought?

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: September 25, 2009, 02:20:22 »

A class 67 + 12 carriages would not stand a chance of getting to 125mph. It would struggle to get to 110mph and that would be with very poor acceleration.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page