Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 28 Mar 2024
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:20 Reading to Shalford
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 19:40 Redhill to Reading
19:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 20:32:06 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[118] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[116] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[89] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[38] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[28] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 116
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Railway: on-board catering, buffets, Travelling Chef, Pullman - ongoing discussion  (Read 629240 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #765 on: September 03, 2014, 20:54:14 »

All but confirmed there will be an additional four Pullman services starting in the not too distant future.

Barry Doe, writing in this fortnight's RAIL Magazine (756) gives flesh to the bones of the rumours.
 
South Wales gets a reintroduction of an 'up' Breakfast Pullman, departing Swansea at 0559 with a return 'brunch' service leaving Paddington at 0945.

From Plymouth there is an additional 'up' Breakfast Pullman at 0553 with, again, a return 'brunch' Pullman at 1006.

No word yet as to which stations service will be available from. On the up Pullman Breakfast from Swansea I expect the last sitting will be for those boarding at Bristol Parkway. I hope so. It'll give me a chance to try it out. The additional up from Plymouth will likely have service to passengers boarding Plymouth-Taunton incl. I expect the 'down' brunch services will be available from Paddington and Reading, although I suppose it may be possible to serve someone boarding from Swindon heading to Swansea (I can think of one other person who may dine if that's possible...)

These are in addition to the six existing services:

0505 Penzance - Paddington (breakfast available after Plymouth at 0655 and all stations to Taunton incl.)
1000 Penzance - Paddington (three course lunch available after Plymouth at 1201 and all stations to Taunton incl.)
1206 Paddington - Penzance (lunch available from Paddington and Reading)
1256 Plymouth - Paddington (lunch available from Plymouth - Castle Cary incl.)
1803 Paddington - Penzance (three course evening meal available from Paddington and Reading)
1903 Paddington - Plymouth (evening meal from Paddington and Reading)

Good to see these additional services, but it's somewhat of a shame that they come at the expense of the Travelling Chef.

Just waiting now for a confirmed start date from FGW (First Great Western)...

Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #766 on: September 04, 2014, 06:40:58 »

1C86 on 03/09/2014 (15:06 London Paddington - Penzance) had no travelling chef again... Angry Angry Angry Angry

From speaking with onboard staff, FGW (First Great Western) are losing ^1,000,000 a year on the travelling chef service alone and by November they will be completely withdrawn. All rather depressing.

There was also suggestions from staff of withdrawing Weekend First or increasing the price, Withdrawing First Class Advance Fares and also withdrawing First Class Off Peak Fares...

For the life of me I cannot see the Off Peak Fares being withdrawn which made me wonder how much was speculation and messroom rumours. The staff members in question however have been working with FGW for longer than I can remember so I am slightly more concerned that I perhaps should be...

I must stress that although the above did come from an FGW Member of Staff... I have no further evidence to prove or disprove these comments and they should be treated as such Smiley
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #767 on: September 04, 2014, 09:37:23 »

For the life of me I cannot see the Off Peak Fares being withdrawn which made me wonder how much was speculation and messroom rumours.

Messroom rumour I would imagine.  Negativity is always rife in the messrooms!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #768 on: September 04, 2014, 10:09:11 »

I can definitely see Weekend First either being withdrawn or increased in price with a hook line that with WF you will get enhanced on board service with customer hosts at weekends and access to the First class lounge at PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains).
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #769 on: September 04, 2014, 10:14:36 »

1C86 on 03/09/2014 (15:06 London Paddington - Penzance) had no travelling chef again... Angry Angry Angry Angry

From speaking with onboard staff, FGW (First Great Western) are losing ^1,000,000 a year on the travelling chef service alone and by November they will be completely withdrawn. All rather depressing.

There was also suggestions from staff of withdrawing Weekend First or increasing the price, Withdrawing First Class Advance Fares and also withdrawing First Class Off Peak Fares...

I must stress that although the above did come from an FGW Member of Staff... I have no further evidence to prove or disprove these comments and they should be treated as such Smiley


Sounds like a sound commercial decision on that basis, no sensible business would continue to soak up that sort of loss......fully agree with withdrawing Weekend First as First class capacity has been slashed otherewise people with full fare tickets are going to miss out on a seat when someone nips in with a ^20 supplement.....weekend first was designed to use up accomodation in times of low demand, these times are now disappearing......less relaxed about First Advance being withdrawn (notwithstanding that these are rumours albeit from well informed people).........think all this demonstrates how cutting 1st class was hasty,poorly thought through and the implications not considered...the premium service is getting less so day by day it seems!
Logged
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #770 on: September 04, 2014, 10:20:45 »

I have also heard said rumours of a "rethink about WF". I dunno if WF is an ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here) requirement as it seems all the IC (Inter City) operators have it EC/GW (Great Western)/WC (Wiltshire Council (Unitary Authority))/.

Also think a supplement should be introduced to advance holders, EC do it for their KGX lounge. Virgin restrict the use of the lounge time time wise.

How is it fair that someone on a say ^20 advance should get more benefits then someone on a FOR?
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #771 on: September 04, 2014, 11:27:06 »

Well last year ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here) put out press release about the increased use of First Class, highlighting the uses of advances, weekend first and Railcards, and it being driven also through enhanced lounges and catering.

However, that was last year's spin; this year's appears to be different.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #772 on: September 04, 2014, 16:25:21 »

I have also heard said rumours of a "rethink about WF". I dunno if WF is an ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here) requirement as it seems all the IC (Inter City) operators have it EC/GW (Great Western)/WC (Wiltshire Council (Unitary Authority))/.

Also think a supplement should be introduced to advance holders, EC do it for their KGX lounge. Virgin restrict the use of the lounge time time wise.

How is it fair that someone on a say ^20 advance should get more benefits then someone on a FOR?


Probably tricky unless it's renamed the "First Class open return lounge"?  I guess in this context a 1st class ticket is a 1st class ticket? Not sure how much "fairness" comes into it but I guess that could work both ways..........unless you make it a "Business" type lounge on the basis that most people with FOR will be travelling on expenses/Business? ......that said , I'm not aware of any restrictions of this type in airport lounges.....Business class is Business class regardless for that purpose.


Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #773 on: September 04, 2014, 16:45:23 »

Pity about the travelling chef, but the extra Pullmans are good news to me at least.
We are nearly back to the good old days when seven services from London to the west had restaurants, with a similar number eastbound.
Unfortunately I have now moved to the West country and wont be enjoying the Pullman as often as in the past.

As regards the various forms of discounted first class travel, I doubt that these will vanish, but I would expect shallower discounts for advance purchases, smaller numbers of discounted tickets, and a greater supplement for weekend first.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #774 on: September 04, 2014, 17:39:07 »

I agree with broadgage and would expect the number of cheap advance first class fares to reduce, but still expect them to be available in a reasonable number on many off-peak services that would otherwise have loads of empty first class seats if the only tickets available were FOS or FOR.  In the case of the mini-buffet sets there will be (as I understand it) around 72 first class seats instead of 95 so it really isn't that dramatic a drop on many of the trains anyway. 

Standard class seating on those trains rises from 474 to 513, only 13 short of the 9-Car IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) proposed layouts - I wonder if we may see them eventually built with less first class seating than the 101 seats that featured in those proposed layouts?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #775 on: September 04, 2014, 18:19:10 »

How is it fair that someone on a say ^20 advance should get more benefits then someone on a FOR?

Life isn't fair. There are many examples where two people pay different prices for the same product. Or where you pay the same price for nominally the same product but get different service.

Someone with a railcard reduced First Class ticket gets the same benefits as those without. They've paid less, should they get a reduced service? Where do you draw the line. One tea for the 1st AP below ^40, tea and biscuits for the 1st AP above ^40. Tea, biscuits and lounge access for the 1st Off Peak holder. All of the above only for those on 1st Anytime tickets?

If you have a 1st Class ticket, you should get the 1st Class service. On the train at least.

Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #776 on: September 05, 2014, 08:38:04 »

How is it fair that someone on a say ^20 advance should get more benefits then someone on a FOR?

Life isn't fair. There are many examples where two people pay different prices for the same product. Or where you pay the same price for nominally the same product but get different service.

Someone with a railcard reduced First Class ticket gets the same benefits as those without. They've paid less, should they get a reduced service? Where do you draw the line. One tea for the 1st AP below ^40, tea and biscuits for the 1st AP above ^40. Tea, biscuits and lounge access for the 1st Off Peak holder. All of the above only for those on 1st Anytime tickets?

If you have a 1st Class ticket, you should get the 1st Class service. On the train at least.



I agree, but would draw the line at Weekend First.....let's say for example I've got a First class open return which I've bought as I need maximum flexibility and have decided to travel from Plymouth to Paddington on a Sunday afternoon........train starts at Penzance and by the time it's gets to Plym the one and a little bit carriage of 1st class is full of people who have paid a (relatively) small supplement to upgrade their Standard class tickets......would the TM(resolve) turf one of them out? No chance..... Clearly this is an anomaly - so in essence if you've bought a 1st class ticket at any price, you should get the service, but you shouldn't be able to "upgrade" a standard class ticket and enjoy the enhanced facilities at the expense of someone who has a "pukka" 1st class ticket.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #777 on: September 05, 2014, 09:47:13 »

Those with an open return will soon learn to reserve a seat....

(I know, they shouldn't strictly have to)
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #778 on: September 05, 2014, 10:59:59 »

Those with an open return will soon learn to reserve a seat....

(I know, they shouldn't strictly have to)

............if the total flexibility with which this ticket is sold at an enormous price is going to be reduced, then so must be the cost - you can't have it both ways.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #779 on: September 05, 2014, 11:00:27 »

Those with an open return will soon learn to reserve a seat....

(I know, they shouldn't strictly have to)

IME (in my experience) the main reason for purchasing an open return is uncertainty as to the time at which one will return. If the time of return is known, then in most cases one might as well book a discounted ticket, which unlike a full price one guarantees a seat.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 116
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page