Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:15 19 Apr 2024
- Arrest over alleged Russia plot to kill Zelensky
- Dubai airport delays persist after UAE storm
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19/04/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
05:25 Swansea to London Paddington
19/04/24 06:04 Gloucester to Worcester Foregate Street
Short Run
19/04/24 05:33 Bedwyn to London Paddington
19/04/24 06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:02 Bristol Parkway to Carmarthen
19/04/24 06:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19/04/24 07:13 Great Malvern to London Paddington
09:27 Carmarthen to London Paddington
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
17:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
Delayed
06:01 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 06:15:53 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[176] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[71] Signage - not making it easy ...
[15] IETs at Melksham
[13] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[12] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
[12] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: "Weston Williamson Unveils Design for Paddington Station" - DBN (09/12/2009)  (Read 12728 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« on: December 09, 2009, 14:37:06 »

From Design Build Network:

Quote from: Design Build Network
Weston Williamson Unveils Design for Paddington Station

UK (United Kingdom)-based Weston Williamson Architects has unveiled its design for the proposed crossrail station at Paddington, London, which is part of the east-west rail link.

The design features a metal and glass entrance in the north in place of the existing Hammersmith & City Line station, which is to be demolished, while the south side leads to a Grade-I listed building which will be preserved.

The glazed building features a green roof and solar panels, which will be used to power the station lighting.

The station concourse will be used to display art, while a landscaped public square will be created between the new station entrance and Regent's Canal as well as a taxi stand.

The new entrance will serve as a access point for all services.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2009, 16:22:26 »

Formally known in the 1920's to 50's as Bishops Bridge Road station, great when the world turns full circle (unlike the circle line)
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Boppy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 182


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2009, 16:37:12 »

Ah that's interesting to hear.  Thanks.

If the Hammersmith (and Circle Line from next week) station is to close during the works then it's not going to be much fun travelling Eastbound along the Circle line from Paddington - one stop change please!

Boppy.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2009, 16:38:59 »

Ah that's interesting to hear.  Thanks.

If the Hammersmith (and Circle Line from next week) station is to close during the works then it's not going to be much fun travelling Eastbound along the Circle line from Paddington - one stop change please!

Boppy.

I'd be tempted to walk to Edgeware Road
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2009, 11:11:42 »

Or get a 27 or 205 bus which drops you right by Edgware Road Circle Line station.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2009, 11:22:10 »

Had a little snippet of infor this week regards Crossrail, to reduce the cost the design of some of the stations at the eastern end of the core may be  reduced in grandeur also the core to Abby Wood is likely to retain its existing 3rd rail electrification rather than be converted to 25kv OHLE
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2009, 18:27:04 »

A bit of a shame that the H&C station is being demolished, as I thought it was the world's oldest Underground station.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2009, 18:43:48 »

A bit of a shame that the H&C station is being demolished, as I thought it was the world's oldest Underground station.
The current platform 15 / 16 date from the 1920's or 30's  the original underground station I believe is the one in Parade St
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2009, 19:58:56 »

Had a little snippet of infor this week regards Crossrail, to reduce the cost the design of some of the stations at the eastern end of the core may be  reduced in grandeur also the core to Abby Wood is likely to retain its existing 3rd rail electrification rather than be converted to 25kv OHLE

Sorry, but how can the line to Abbey Wood retain its existing third rail? Except for a short single track length in the docks which used to be a part of the NLL, it is all brand new alignment. It doesn't even join up with the existing Kent lines until it gets to Abbey Wood station.  I also believe that on any new construction, OHLE will be cheaper than third rail.

Paul
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 19, 2009, 22:56:10 »

Wouldn't it mean the Crossrail trains would have to be dual voltage? Can't see that happening just to save a modest amount of re-electrification.

Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 20, 2009, 10:59:17 »

Thinking about this dual voltage could make sense if Crossrail service is extended beyond Abbey Wood - the alignment needed for four tracking is safeguarded, but a cheapo version could use the existing two tracks beyond Abbey Wood.  Perhaps that's where the idea comes from?

Paul
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 20, 2009, 11:52:43 »

I suppose it is not surprising cost cutting is starting*. Although it is annoying, it is VITAL that we get the central tunnels built to relieve the Tube; if that means less work at the extremities, so be it!

*and remember that the Tories have yet to commit to Xrail!
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 20, 2009, 12:08:57 »

I agree with Btline's views. We don't need cathedral like structures in the suburbs - just fit for purpose stations that can handle the volumes comfortably.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 20, 2009, 15:41:57 »

I don't think there has ever been any suggestion of 'cathedral like' Crossrail stations in the suburbs. Between Paddington and Whitechapel they are all new underground stations, built to allow the necessary capacity, and all double ended (ie 2 entrances) except Whitechapel. So they'll need to deal with 10 car mainline trains - stations about the size of the Jubilee extension will be needed.

Elsewhere on the GWML (Great Western Main Line) and GEML (Great Eastern Main Line) though, nearly all are existing suburban stations which will have platforms lengthened to allow 10 car trains. Woolwich Arsenal will be new, apparently in a basement, and Customs House will be 90% new, but I can't see either being cathedral like...

Paul

Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 20, 2009, 16:39:42 »

Had a little snippet of infor this week regards Crossrail, to reduce the cost the design of some of the stations at the eastern end of the core may be  reduced in grandeur also the core to Abby Wood is likely to retain its existing 3rd rail electrification rather than be converted to 25kv OHLE

Sorry, but how can the line to Abbey Wood retain its existing third rail? Except for a short single track length in the docks which used to be a part of the NLL, it is all brand new alignment. It doesn't even join up with the existing Kent lines until it gets to Abbey Wood station.  I also believe that on any new construction, OHLE will be cheaper than third rail.

Paul
The info cames out of the NR» (Network Rail - home page) Crossrail team the savings would come from the reduction in tunnel size, however I do suspect this is accountants talking without fully realising the consequences.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2009, 16:44:47 by Electric train » Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page