Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:15 28 Mar 2024
* Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Delayed
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 16:34:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 23
  Print  
Author Topic: Oxford Station - improvements, incidents and events (merged topic)  (Read 254814 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #150 on: May 16, 2016, 20:13:01 »

If & when the up loop platform opens (& it is on plans I've seen) another renumber will be necessary...and platform 5 will appear first on the down loop

I'm not sure it will be - the plans I've seen indicate that the up loop platform is merely an extension of bay Platform 2, what was Platform 3 until today.  And yes to Platform 5 being the down loop.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #151 on: May 16, 2016, 21:43:10 »

Yes, that's possible...but isn't Chiltern meant to be getting 2 bay platforms?...
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #152 on: May 17, 2016, 05:11:48 »

I think it was originally, but the likelihood of Chiltern and EW Rail services terminating at Oxford in the longer term looks slim, and so having two north facing bay is enough - the existing one and a new one.  Then if the new platform 2 eventually becomes a through platform then that's still available to them if needed.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #153 on: June 15, 2017, 23:52:50 »

Further details of the Oxford Station Masterplan have been published  http://www.oxfordwestend.co.uk/Direct/Loresexhibitiongraphics.pdf
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #154 on: June 16, 2017, 12:28:05 »

Further details of the Oxford Station Masterplan have been published  http://www.oxfordwestend.co.uk/Direct/Loresexhibitiongraphics.pdf

I've seen that before, it's a 2014 pdf.    Quite possible to have changed since then, I'd have thought?

Paul
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #155 on: June 16, 2017, 13:58:37 »


I've seen that before, it's a 2014 pdf.    Quite possible to have changed since then, I'd have thought?

Paul

Sorry was trying to be helpful and not put in a link to something behind a paywall.

Try this http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/15341633.RAILWAY_STATION_REVAMP__Oxford_s_full__masterplan__finally_revealed/
Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #156 on: June 17, 2017, 16:43:52 »

I hope that if any platforms are likely to be occupied by more than 1 train at a time – quite likely I would have thought with terminators coming in from the north and the south – then the platforms will be properly signalled for this with mid platform signals etc.  Unlike Reading. 
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #157 on: June 17, 2017, 17:30:40 »

I hope that if any platforms are likely to be occupied by more than 1 train at a time – quite likely I would have thought with terminators coming in from the north and the south – then the platforms will be properly signalled for this with mid platform signals etc.  Unlike Reading.
They won't be. Normal platform sharing arrangements using 'Calling On' aspects on the platform protecting stop signals are being provided.
Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #158 on: June 17, 2017, 18:14:57 »

OK, but Group Standard GK/RT0044 “Guidance on Permissive Working” states:

"2.2.1    Facilities for signalling a passenger train on to an occupied line shall only be provided where all of the following apply:
                a) It is a platform line.
                b) The purpose is for platform sharing and / or joining trains.
                c) There is no reasonably practicable alternative method of working which presents less risk."

Para c) acknowledges that signalling a passenger train on to an occupied line (ie permissive working) carries a risk.  I would have thought that for a new layout with new signalling it would be difficult for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to claim “there is no reasonably practicable alternative method of working which presents less risk”. 
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #159 on: June 17, 2017, 19:17:05 »

So very poor integrated transport requiring those with mobility problems to have to negotiate their way to Becket Street (no current plans for pick up in front of the new station. Only pedestrians and cyclists get that bonus
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #160 on: June 17, 2017, 20:16:59 »

OK, but Group Standard GK/RT0044 “Guidance on Permissive Working” states:

"2.2.1    Facilities for signalling a passenger train on to an occupied line shall only be provided where all of the following apply:
                a) It is a platform line.
                b) The purpose is for platform sharing and / or joining trains.
                c) There is no reasonably practicable alternative method of working which presents less risk."

Para c) acknowledges that signalling a passenger train on to an occupied line (ie permissive working) carries a risk.  I would have thought that for a new layout with new signalling it would be difficult for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to claim “there is no reasonably practicable alternative method of working which presents less risk”.
I think you have mis-understood that.  It means that permissive working itself should not implemented unless there is no alternative, not that alternative signalling should be arranged to permit it. In truth it is suggesting that there should be additional platforms that are not shared.

I can think of lots of recent schemes that comply with the standard but don't have intermediate platform signals.  Out of interest Bristol Temple Meads will have intermediate platform signals but that is probably due to the length of the platforms which are in effect two operationally separate platforms and will therefore be separated by signals.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2017, 20:33:47 by SandTEngineer » Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #161 on: June 18, 2017, 10:41:19 »

We are interpreting this extract differently, others can come to their own conclusions.  The fact is that permissive working carries risks which can be avoided if fixed signals are provided, and providing fixed signals at new build stage is relatively easy. 

NB the Sprinter/High Speed Train (HST (High Speed Train)) collision at Plymouth last year, the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) Report on which was published in February.


Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 16:04:21 by VickiS » Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #162 on: June 18, 2017, 15:02:52 »

We are interpreting this extract differently, others can come to their own conclusions.  The fact is that permissive working carries risks which can be avoided if fixed signals are provided, and providing fixed signals at new build stage is relatively easy. 

NB the Sprinter/High Speed Train (HST (High Speed Train)) collision at Plymouth last year, the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) Report on which was published in February.
Fixed mid-platform signals would not have reduced the risk as part of that collision.  The High Speed Train (HST) was stood well past the platform mid-point so the DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) would have still been signalled into an occupied platform by a 'Calling On' aspect.

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 16:05:29 by VickiS » Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #163 on: June 19, 2017, 08:57:03 »

The point I was making is that permissive working carries risks which do not exist with fixed signals.  Permissive working is sometimes necessary eg coupling up but my view is that where it can be avoided it should be.  If there had been a mid-platform signal and the first train couldn't fit behind (like the HST (High Speed Train) at Plymouth), then I contend that a second train should not normally be allowed in permissively from the other end.  If the first train had been a 3 car Sprinter from the London end, it could have sat behind a mid-platform signal and the Sprinter from Cornwall could have been safely let in to the platform under fixed signals.

Fixed signals, especially nowadays with TPWS (Train Protection and Warning System) etc, provide a safeguard against human error: these safeguards do not exist with permissive working, hence the wording in the Group Standard.

I think I've said all I want to say on this topic, S&TE I'm happy if you have the last word.  Off to the seaside for a few days so I'll leave arguments behind.

Sorry about delayed response – BBQ yesterday and I don’t email, post messages etc when I’ve been drinking! 

3rd sentence edited for clarity
« Last Edit: June 19, 2017, 09:14:31 by Gordon the Blue Engine » Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #164 on: June 19, 2017, 09:57:15 »

Enjoy your break.  Don't think I have any further points to add to those I have already made Wink
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 23
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page