Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 23 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 23rd Apr

Train RunningCancelled
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
16:23 London Paddington to Oxford
16:45 Twyford to Henley-On-Thames
17:00 Henley-On-Thames to Twyford
18:00 Oxford to London Paddington
19:23 London Paddington to Oxford
21:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
10:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:02 Westbury to Gloucester
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Delayed
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 23, 2024, 15:26:20 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[367] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[70] "Mayflower"
[54] You see all sorts on the bus.
[38] Where have I been?
[34] Theft from Severn Valley Railway
[32] Death of another bus station?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Pre-series Super Express Trains cancelled and delay to IEP Programme?  (Read 13203 times)
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« on: February 05, 2010, 21:35:06 »

From another forum,"An interesting answer from the Minister, Chris Mole on 28 January
2010. It looks as if the pre-series IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) has been cancelled".

'Norman Baker: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport
what estimate his Department has made of the financial savings that
would result from cancelling (a) the East Coast pilot fleet of the
Inter-city Express Programme and (b) the Inter-city Express Programme
East Coast depot. [314076]

Chris Mole: The 'pilot fleet' or Pre-Series Trains concept no longer
applies.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2010, 14:09:50 »

Roger Ford's Informed Sources preview out today now has the first batch of IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) described as 'Package 0', and it seems to be for '1 for 1' replacement of the ECML (East Coast Main Line) HST (High Speed Train) fleet, with full length bi-modes. 

The original 'pre series' idea provided for a selection of different train lengths and modes.

There is then package 1, ECML 180 DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) and Cambridge/Kings Lynn 365 replacement.

Packages 2,3 and 4 then cover the GWML (Great Western Main Line) and its electrification.

Apparently there are further changes to the design to be discussed in forthcoming articles, presumably these will provide the detail on stuff like the 2nd transformer in the full bi-modes, which has been mentioned recently.

Not really relevant to this area, but he is suggesting that the cancelled order is the remaining Pendolino lengthening, which is only an option.

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2010, 14:28:20 »

Let's hope that all this untried technology works pretty well out of the box then!  At least the users of the WCML (West Coast Main Line) won't be the first route to have to iron out any teething problems on.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2010, 15:57:55 »

I'm not sure how much really will be untried technology. Apart from the diesel generator, surely nearly eveything else on the train can be found on the 395s ruunning on HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel), or on other Japanese trains?  Intercity style doors on the corners are the main visible detail not present on the 395s - hardly cutting edge technology?

Paul
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6298


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2010, 17:49:36 »

Not really relevant to this area, but he is suggesting that the cancelled order is the remaining Pendolino lengthening, which is only an option.
Well that is really short sighted IMHO (in my humble opinion) if that is the case. The production line is open so why not invest in future capacity and finish the job by lengthening the entire fleet. To do it later would be a huge cost and therefore unviable.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2010, 00:14:47 »

I'm not sure how much really will be untried technology. Apart from the diesel generator, surely nearly eveything else on the train can be found on the 395s ruunning on HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel), or on other Japanese trains?  Intercity style doors on the corners are the main visible detail not present on the 395s - hardly cutting edge technology?

It's more about the reliability of the diesel engine on the bi-mode trains - only one engine needs great reliability. With HST (High Speed Train)'s you can struggle on with one engine most of the time and Adelantes/Voyagers (and to a lesser extent Turbos/150/158's etc.) regularly suffer engine failures which aren't really noticeable due to the other engines on the train.

Also, the on train systems will need to be able to adapt with being powered from the wires one minute and the diesel generator the next - pretty much unproven on a high speed train as far as I know?

We'll see - hopefully the temptation to over-engineer the train (as with the Adelante) will be resisted, but with these trains being unique in some areas, to expect them to work out of the box might be asking a little too much?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2010, 13:56:40 »

Looks like DafT has finally noticed what a monster they have created, though apparently the delay is all the fault of the financial markets

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8538222.stm

Lord Adonis's statement

http://www.dft.gov.uk/press/speechesstatements/statements/adonis20100226

Nice high-powered, reliable, work-out-of-the-box German electric locomotives and new hauled coaches anyone?
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2010, 16:07:44 »

It's a nice idea but I reckon they'd get some unplanned re-gauging the first time they encountered one of our bridges or tunnels...
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2010, 16:40:27 »

Lets just order some trains similar to 395s, and get the knitting up. Job done.
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2010, 18:03:53 »

Lets just order some trains similar to 395s, and get the knitting up. Job done.


while they are at it reinstate the order for 172's plus add on some more to improve capacity and enable older rubbish like pacers and 153's to be scrapped (talking great western region here)
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2010, 19:01:38 »

Far too sensible, we'd be better spending ^x billion on consultations about possible train designs with as much exotic equipment as possible.  Lips sealed
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2010, 20:05:20 »

Quote
Lets just order some trains similar to 395s,

I hope that what is basically a souped-up Japanese suburban emu isn't the future of intercity rail travel in the UK (United Kingdom). Even extending the life of HSTs (High Speed Train) yet again has got to be better than that.

It's a nice idea but I reckon they'd get some unplanned re-gauging the first time they encountered one of our bridges or tunnels...

Both Bombardier and Siemens have indicated they would have no trouble shrinking down their current standard European electric loco designs into UK loading gauge bodies if it was worth their while to do so. Eurostar is of course a shrunken TGV (Train a Grande Vitesse), Virgin Pendolinos are a shrunken version of the Italian original, and the body of an SET (Super Express Train (now IET)) coach was planned to be almost as big as those of the tilting versions (diesel and electric) of German ICE trains. Give someone a big enough order and they'll do what's needed to squeeze under British bridges.

IF DafT hadn't taken what began life as an HST replacement programme and tried to solve just about every rolling stock issue going, from replacing outer-suburban London commuter trains to the HST and Class 91s, come up with frankly bizarre stuff like fitting diesel shunting engines into express electric trains and defying the laws of physics when it came to the supposed performance of the bi-mode version running on diesel power, then we would probably have ordered some new trains, based on proven technology, several years ago, with the prospect of some of them entering service in the near future, rather than the UK taxpayer and assorted trainbuilders wasting time and countless millions of pounds, euros and yen on the railway equivalent of reinventing the wheel.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6298


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 26, 2010, 20:39:16 »

All this delay because of one man waiting when its best for him to call a general election. I don't want to go off topic but if there is one thing the Americans have got so right is fixed terms between elections. This country needs to have an election so whoever forms the next government can get on with this and many other issues that need sorting that are kicked into the long grass until it suits Gordon to give us our say.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2010, 02:04:58 »

Eurostar is of course a shrunken TGV (Train a Grande Vitesse)

There's an interesting documentary doing the rounds one on of the channels on Sky about the KTX (Korean Express Train), the first build of trains for their new HS (High Speed (short for HSS (High Speed Services) High Speed Services)) line, opened in in 2004, was basically an enlarged TGV (picture of one of the beasts here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/KTX.jpg ).  Though a forward thinking country like Korea already has a newer model already on the tracks and a third generation 400kph+ model making its d^but in the near future.  Their initial line from Seoul to Busan is about 200 miles in length, so not too dissimilar to a line from London to Manchester and on to Leeds that the Tories have been pushing, and has been built on very challenging terrain.

come up with frankly bizarre stuff like fitting diesel shunting engines into express electric trains

I actually thought that was quite a sensible idea as it would provide enough power to get the train to the nearest station in the event of overhead power failure, or off of the main line in the event of a power connected train failure, or to be able to move itself within the confines of a non-electrified depot or sidings.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2010, 02:46:22 by IndustryInsider » Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2010, 13:11:12 »

All this delay because of one man waiting when its best for him to call a general election. I don't want to go off topic but if there is one thing the Americans have got so right is fixed terms between elections. This country needs to have an election so whoever forms the next government can get on with this and many other issues that need sorting that are kicked into the long grass until it suits Gordon to give us our say.

While I am no Labour voter, and have no time for that fool we currently have "leading us", it was pretty obvious that after he bottled calling an election after Blair left, and his continued unpopular rating, it was never going to be anything but a 5-year term.  The same applied of course to John Major in 1997.

Having said that, I do agree with you re: fixed terms, and perhaps a mandatory election if there is a change to the party-leader.

It is a shame, that the only positive thing I have to say about Labour in the last 13 years is Lord Adonis, but there is no guarantee he wouldn't be "moved" in the cabinet if Labour won.
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page