Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 20 Apr 2024
- Three men killed in retail park car crash named
- Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
- Three men killed in retail park car crash identified
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
07:55 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
19:19 Carmarthen to Swansea
Short Run
06:12 Penzance to London Paddington
06:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
10:09 Gloucester to Westbury
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
14:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
21:07 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
08:55 Paignton to London Paddington
09:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
10:03 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2024, 11:41:11 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[296] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[235] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[56] On reservations, fees and supplements - Interrail
[39] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[35] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[17] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 33
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 142 Pacers in service on Devon branch lines, 2007 to 2011 - merged topic  (Read 153520 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40786



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #45 on: October 10, 2007, 16:10:46 »

... why should we loose decent 158's only to have them replaced by a bus with no tyres ...

Decision taken by Tom Harris. "There's more growth in the North" he said to David Redgewell in personat the labour party conference. I was speaking last night in person to David.  Tom Harris accepts full responsibility for the decision I understand, and a number of others such as the lack of extra trains in the area. "People are able to travel, and when they get really full, FGW (First Great Western) lay on a few extra buses.  What's the problem, and it doesn't cost me anything".

Perhaps it should cost him something in terms of votes.   Isn't there a labour MP (Member of Parliament) in Swindon and a labout MP in Exeter?  How safe are their seats?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: October 10, 2007, 16:18:12 »

What do you expect from Labour though?  bunch of hypocritical tory wannabees.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #47 on: October 10, 2007, 16:25:11 »

Perhaps it should cost him something in terms of votes.   Isn't there a labour MP (Member of Parliament) in Swindon and a labout MP in Exeter?  How safe are their seats?

Well , its shaky for Snelgrove in Swindon South , and wobbly for Wills in Swindon North , both of whom saw a collapse in support last time round , leaving them with vulnerable majorities (links below.)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/vote2005/html/568.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/vote2005/html/567.stm

Ben Bradshaw (Exeter) , recently appointed "Champion Of The West" (!) , saw a similiar slump in votes , but still has a 7,665 majority (link below.)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/vote2005/html/245.stm
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #48 on: October 10, 2007, 16:41:43 »

... why should we loose decent 158's only to have them replaced by a bus with no tyres ...

Decision taken by Tom Harris. "There's more growth in the North" he said to David Redgewell in personat the labour party conference. I was speaking last night in person to David.  Tom Harris accepts full responsibility for the decision I understand, and a number of others such as the lack of extra trains in the area. "People are able to travel, and when they get really full, FGW (First Great Western) lay on a few extra buses.  What's the problem, and it doesn't cost me anything".

Perhaps it should cost him something in terms of votes.   Isn't there a labour MP (Member of Parliament) in Swindon and a labout MP in Exeter?  How safe are their seats?

And does anybody who commutes in the SW give a toss whats happening up north.

Are the north complaining about 142s?

No

Are we happy with our 150s?

Yes

If it isn't broke don't fix it!
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: October 10, 2007, 17:38:58 »

... why should we loose decent 158's only to have them replaced by a bus with no tyres ...

Decision taken by Tom Harris. "There's more growth in the North" he said to David Redgewell in personat the labour party conference. I was speaking last night in person to David.  Tom Harris accepts full responsibility for the decision I understand, and a number of others such as the lack of extra trains in the area. "People are able to travel, and when they get really full, FGW (First Great Western) lay on a few extra buses.  What's the problem, and it doesn't cost me anything".

Perhaps it should cost him something in terms of votes.   Isn't there a labour MP (Member of Parliament) in Swindon and a labout MP in Exeter?  How safe are their seats?

And does anybody who commutes in the SW give a toss whats happening up north.

Are the north complaining about 142s?

No

Are we happy with our 150s?

Yes

If it isn't broke don't fix it!

Here, here! some sense at last!!!!!
Logged
gaf71
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 305


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: October 10, 2007, 18:36:13 »



And i agree with "shazz", i have never once had, a or seen a failed 142/143/144.


I seem to remember a 143 catching fire in the nailsea area a couple of years ago, and having worked 143's many times and often having to fail the units( normally due to door faults), i am not looking forward to working 142's on the devon branches.
Some drivers are already talking about going sick after a 5 hour stint at the controls( Paignton-Exmouth-Paignton) due to the bouncing around causing back pain, and headache from the noise.
Believe me this is a massive step backwards, though i do agree with intercity about tables, wi-fi, buffets etc.
If only these things had a history of reliability!
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: October 10, 2007, 18:38:28 »

At least they're not coming to Cornwall!! Yet................
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #52 on: October 10, 2007, 19:07:14 »



And i agree with "shazz", i have never once had, a or seen a failed 142/143/144.


I seem to remember a 143 catching fire in the nailsea area a couple of years ago, and having worked 143's many times and often having to fail the units( normally due to door faults), i am not looking forward to working 142's on the devon branches.
Some drivers are already talking about going sick after a 5 hour stint at the controls( Paignton-Exmouth-Paignton) due to the bouncing around causing back pain, and headache from the noise.
Believe me this is a massive step backwards, though i do agree with intercity about tables, wi-fi, buffets etc.
If only these things had a history of reliability!

Last time i was on a 142 I has a headache.

142:
Dangerous motion
2+3 seating
No tables
3 doors per side
Likely to fail

150s
Tables
Nice 2+2 seating
4 doors per side + guard
more seats
fairly reliable
can be doubled up with ease.
Logged
intercity125
Newbie
*
Posts: 5


View Profile Email
« Reply #53 on: October 10, 2007, 19:53:19 »

I'd rather have a class 142 anyday over these rancid FGW (First Great Western) HST (High Speed Train) refurbed set's, and im a die hard HST fan....

Logged
intercity125
Newbie
*
Posts: 5


View Profile Email
« Reply #54 on: October 10, 2007, 19:55:07 »


If it isn't broke don't fix it!


FGW (First Great Western) should have thought about this before tampering with the HST (High Speed Train)'s.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #55 on: October 11, 2007, 14:04:11 »

And i agree with "shazz", i have never once had, a or seen a failed 142/143/144.

There was an oil leak on the Class 143 0805 Bristol Temple Meads - Avonmouth service this morning. I also wonder whether you might be about to get deluged with tales of Pacer breakdowns past........

The initial information I received was incorrect , and it was in fact a Class 158 unit that formed the 0805 oil - leak train.

For all the Pacer fans out there - I hope thats made your day......
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #56 on: October 11, 2007, 16:36:57 »

Lesson to learn: Don't travel on the 0738 as it calls at every shack to Bristol.

On the other hand the 1415 is a fairly fast service.

Addition by Graham

Due to an error by the moderator - me - this post no longer makes sense here.  It relates to Paington to London trains that take the Great Way Round (07:38) and Berks and Hants (14:15) ... see all about it at

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=773.0

Sorry I've made you post look odd, Liam, by splitting the topic.

« Last Edit: October 11, 2007, 19:20:36 by grahame » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40786



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #57 on: October 11, 2007, 17:20:05 »

I have moved the post by "Train Drained" out of this thread to the "London to the West" board, as it was in danger of getting lost in the flood of 142 concerns, when it had some other important points to make.

-- Graham

Now at:

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=773.0
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #58 on: October 11, 2007, 18:02:29 »

May make sence to remove my post and this one Wink
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40786



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #59 on: October 11, 2007, 19:17:07 »

May make sence to remove my post and this one Wink

Oh gosh - sorry - did that relate to the Paington to London post which I removed from thsi thread to give it the exposure it deserved?    Thanks for the nudge.   Actually I'll us this as another chance to tell people about that other thread if I may - it's at

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=773.0
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 33
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page