Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:15 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
* Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 12:22:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[124] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[49] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[48] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[43] Return of the BRUTE?
[30] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 230
  Print  
Author Topic: Reading Station improvements  (Read 1356728 times)
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #990 on: December 08, 2012, 19:43:54 »

Looked at the plan for the north and south entrances again.  There's an awful lot of work to be done on the south side before the subway can be used.  When were they going to need it was it end of February?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #991 on: December 09, 2012, 10:39:08 »

...Incidentally why is the grey box part in the building and part out? Is it going to be moved or will the building be larger?

Oddly enough, as these boxes are known as 'relocatable equipment buildings' (REBs), I'd have initially thought relocation was an option. IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) this one is labelled 'Station REB.  But on second thoughts it is likely that the idea of the REB is simply to build and test the contained signalling equipment at the factory, and deliver as a 'job lot' and connect to local cabling when in its designed position. So I'm tending towards the fact that it is easier to build round/over it than disturb all the relevant cabling.  However this could possibly happen later at a future major alteration to the signalling? 

You'll see similar boxes at either end of the station, including in line with the new platforms, and of course they are all over the existing railway.

Paul 
« Last Edit: December 09, 2012, 10:47:28 by paul7755 » Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #992 on: December 09, 2012, 13:12:02 »

...Incidentally why is the grey box part in the building and part out? Is it going to be moved or will the building be larger?

Oddly enough, as these boxes are known as 'relocatable equipment buildings' (REBs), I'd have initially thought relocation was an option. IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) this one is labelled 'Station REB.  But on second thoughts it is likely that the idea of the REB is simply to build and test the contained signalling equipment at the factory, and deliver as a 'job lot' and connect to local cabling when in its designed position. So I'm tending towards the fact that it is easier to build round/over it than disturb all the relevant cabling.  However this could possibly happen later at a future major alteration to the signalling? 

You'll see similar boxes at either end of the station, including in line with the new platforms, and of course they are all over the existing railway.

Paul 

Thanks Paul
Logged
Jonty
Full Member
***
Posts: 42


View Profile
« Reply #993 on: December 09, 2012, 13:44:20 »

Anyone know whether the new office block nearly finished off Richfield avenue by the new maintenance sheds are temporary or permanent?

They seem to be built in a modular/temporary way, but also seem so extensive that suggests that they are unlikely to be temporary.

But if permanent why not just incorporate the offices into the shed buildings, rather than building them apart from them...?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #994 on: December 09, 2012, 16:55:31 »

Anyone know whether the new office block nearly finished off Richfield avenue by the new maintenance sheds are temporary or permanent?

They seem to be built in a modular/temporary way, but also seem so extensive that suggests that they are unlikely to be temporary.

But if permanent why not just incorporate the offices into the shed buildings, rather than building them apart from them...?

Marked on the plans as 'Depot Staff Accommodation Building'.  Permanent, but modular in appearance I would guess as that's a nice cheap way to build things these days - many modern housing developments use similar building practices.

There will be some offices in the shed buildings as well, but why they weren't all incorporated into one building I don't know.  Either space constraints, or ease of access - that building is likely to be in an non-HV vest area for office staff for example - are possible reasons.  The offices in the current upper depot are separate from the main train shed (but not the lower depot!).
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #995 on: December 09, 2012, 20:21:36 »

Anyone know whether the new office block nearly finished off Richfield avenue by the new maintenance sheds are temporary or permanent?

They seem to be built in a modular/temporary way, but also seem so extensive that suggests that they are unlikely to be temporary.

But if permanent why not just incorporate the offices into the shed buildings, rather than building them apart from them...?

Marked on the plans as 'Depot Staff Accommodation Building'.  Permanent, but modular in appearance I would guess as that's a nice cheap way to build things these days - many modern housing developments use similar building practices.

There will be some offices in the shed buildings as well, but why they weren't all incorporated into one building I don't know.  Either space constraints, or ease of access - that building is likely to be in an non-HV vest area for office staff for example - are possible reasons.  The offices in the current upper depot are separate from the main train shed (but not the lower depot!).

Could be the "depot staff building" is for the in service train fault team.

Modular build is not always a cheap build often the modular buildings are more expensive than the insitu built ones where the savings are made is the on site time especially if possessions are required.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #996 on: December 09, 2012, 21:07:02 »

Anyone know whether the new office block nearly finished off Richfield avenue by the new maintenance sheds are temporary or permanent?

They seem to be built in a modular/temporary way, but also seem so extensive that suggests that they are unlikely to be temporary.

But if permanent why not just incorporate the offices into the shed buildings, rather than building them apart from them...?

Marked on the plans as 'Depot Staff Accommodation Building'.  Permanent, but modular in appearance I would guess as that's a nice cheap way to build things these days - many modern housing developments use similar building practices.

There will be some offices in the shed buildings as well, but why they weren't all incorporated into one building I don't know.  Either space constraints, or ease of access - that building is likely to be in an non-HV vest area for office staff for example - are possible reasons.  The offices in the current upper depot are separate from the main train shed (but not the lower depot!).

Could be the "depot staff building" is for the in service train fault team.

Modular build is not always a cheap build often the modular buildings are more expensive than the insitu built ones where the savings are made is the on site time especially if possessions are required.

If modular buildings are being widely presented as the way forward to save costs.  On the continent they are widely used in preference to insitu build as they have been proven to reduce costs.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #997 on: December 09, 2012, 21:24:52 »

Anyone know whether the new office block nearly finished off Richfield avenue by the new maintenance sheds are temporary or permanent?

They seem to be built in a modular/temporary way, but also seem so extensive that suggests that they are unlikely to be temporary.

But if permanent why not just incorporate the offices into the shed buildings, rather than building them apart from them...?

Marked on the plans as 'Depot Staff Accommodation Building'.  Permanent, but modular in appearance I would guess as that's a nice cheap way to build things these days - many modern housing developments use similar building practices.

There will be some offices in the shed buildings as well, but why they weren't all incorporated into one building I don't know.  Either space constraints, or ease of access - that building is likely to be in an non-HV vest area for office staff for example - are possible reasons.  The offices in the current upper depot are separate from the main train shed (but not the lower depot!).

Could be the "depot staff building" is for the in service train fault team.

Modular build is not always a cheap build often the modular buildings are more expensive than the insitu built ones where the savings are made is the on site time especially if possessions are required.

If modular buildings are being widely presented as the way forward to save costs.  On the continent they are widely used in preference to insitu build as they have been proven to reduce costs.

I did not say they are not a reduction in costs, I did say they are not a cheap option. 

There is not a lot in the costs in fact (I know I am involved in procuring fixed traction equipment) modular have higher cost in manufacture, transport and delivery to site (eg very large cranes and possessions) traditional brick and mortar have higher on site costs due to the length of time to build and fit out.  Modular has advantage of factory built easier to do acceptance tests on site commissioning is less, modular disadvantage is the building life span is often less than the equipment inside it (an example are the 1980's dc traction substations through Kent the electrical kit has another 10 plus years life the modular buildings are shot.

Don't get me wrong I am a great believer in modular equipment enclosures they are not always the best answer
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #998 on: December 09, 2012, 21:47:51 »


I did not say they are not a reduction in costs, I did say they are not a cheap option. 

There is not a lot in the costs in fact (I know I am involved in procuring fixed traction equipment) modular have higher cost in manufacture, transport and delivery to site (eg very large cranes and possessions) traditional brick and mortar have higher on site costs due to the length of time to build and fit out.  Modular has advantage of factory built easier to do acceptance tests on site commissioning is less, modular disadvantage is the building life span is often less than the equipment inside it (an example are the 1980's dc traction substations through Kent the electrical kit has another 10 plus years life the modular buildings are shot.

Don't get me wrong I am a great believer in modular equipment enclosures they are not always the best answer

The big advantage when you get to site work is that you reduce the risks associated with weather. This can be a major cost in the construction industry. In big civils jobs however there is a cut-off size where the increased crane costs balance out the savings, but in modular building where you are building up from components this is less so. 
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #999 on: December 12, 2012, 14:40:30 »

I thought I'd give a quick summary of where we are and where we'll be in the next year of so of the Reading project (as I understand it):

Completed:  New Platform 4 and extension to Platforms 5 and 6.
28th Feb 2013:  New Subway opens.
1st Mar 2013:  Existing overbridge between the multi-storey car park and the station closes (those from that car park and others usually entering station from north side temporarily need to use new subway).
29th Mar 2013:  Transfer deck opens along with new northern and western entrances and gate lines, and new northern ticket office.
2-4th Apr 2013:  New Platforms 12-15 open after Easter blockade, with revised track layout including the new southern lines underpass.  Platform 16 (and Platform 3?) closes.
May/June 2013:  New maintenance depot and east and west sidings are phased into use with the current Reading TMD (Traction Maintenance Depot) (lower depot) closing.
July/August 2013:  Current Reading fuel point (upper depot) closes and all FGW (First Great Western) stabling and maintenance transfers to the new maintenance depot and east/west end sidings.

Work will also start next year in earnest to the remaining station works and the western underpass, and as I understand it, the east end sidings and maintenance shed, along with the new platforms will have all overhead cables in place.  The west end sidings won't be wired up until the western underpass is completed.  Not sure when the rest of the station will be wired up.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2012, 11:27:45 by IndustryInsider » Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #1000 on: December 12, 2012, 17:31:18 »

Thanks for the update II, I think 2-4 April (not March) for P12-P15 opening [now corrected by II].  Car park users won't be happy with the permanent loss of a short walk to an HST (High Speed Train) for London on 1st March, but you can't please all the people all of the time.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2012, 13:32:11 by Gordon the Blue Engine » Logged
swrural
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 647


View Profile
« Reply #1001 on: December 12, 2012, 18:35:57 »

I don't suppose there is any chance that any of you who have the ability to take the odd snapshot could post one now and then for the benefit of we who are remote from proceedings, please?

Of course I appreciate that you hard-working people probably only pass through in the dark.   Smiley
Logged
Ollie
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2302


View Profile
« Reply #1002 on: December 12, 2012, 18:38:47 »

Here are some pics I took a few months ago.

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10152074737535459.899624.566580458&type=3
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #1003 on: December 12, 2012, 19:02:01 »

Not saying for a minute that great progress hasn't been made, but looking at the transfer deck when I was passing through today I would say getting that open by 29/3/13 looks like a tall order to me!
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1004 on: December 12, 2012, 20:02:37 »

Not saying for a minute that great progress hasn't been made, but looking at the transfer deck when I was passing through today I would say getting that open by 29/3/13 looks like a tall order to me!

I thought the same about p4-6 when they were working on it but it was amazing the progress they made towards the end
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 230
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page