Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:15 28 Mar 2024
* Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 12:07 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:41 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:51 Warminster to Gloucester
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 12:19:32 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[151] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[85] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[58] Return of the BRUTE?
[49] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[46] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[36] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 78 79 [80] 81 82 ... 230
  Print  
Author Topic: Reading Station improvements  (Read 1356461 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9809



View Profile
« Reply #1185 on: February 12, 2013, 13:33:20 »

swrural - it was 44 years ago that I used to abandon the bus and use the 4d my mother gave for the fare to buy a penny sweet and the 3d child single fare from Reading General to Reading West on the way to school!
Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #1186 on: February 12, 2013, 14:32:23 »

Changing the subject slightly, but just to clear up a couple of points that we've discussed in the past which have now become clearer:

1) Method of working for Platforms 12-15
They all have 'Closing In' signals at either end of the platform and are split into an 'A' and 'B' end.  Trains of up to 5 carriages in length that are terminating and heading back out in the same direction will stop at a 'Rear Clear' stop board located approximately mid-way along the platform in either direction ('A' end is London, 'B' end is the Country End).  That will then allow the signaller to route another train (again of up to 5 carriages) into the other part of the platform using permissive working arrangements at the Closing In signal (i.e. a red aspect with two white lights).

Trains of more than 5 carriages will stop at the relevant stop car marker further down the platform, as will through trains of any length.  Regarding concerns over canopy lengths, the canopies are long enough to shelter a train of roughly 6 carriages long, but any train that has stopped at the Rear Clear marker at the 'A' end of the Platform will have most of its length out in the open.

If anyone has any other questions, now is the time to ask!

Will the "Rear Clear" stop boards (not a term I've come across before) on each platform have any space beween them - will there be any kind of overlap distance between the board facing London at the A end and the board facing Bristol at the B end?

And are Drivers and Driver Managers now happy with this arrangement - you indicated before that there was a bit of a problem with this.
Logged
swrural
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 647


View Profile
« Reply #1187 on: February 12, 2013, 15:39:22 »

swrural - it was 44 years ago that I used to abandon the bus and use the 4d my mother gave for the fare to buy a penny sweet and the 3d child single fare from Reading General to Reading West on the way to school!

Lovely.  Of course when I lived there (just behind the RBH) we had trolley buses still going across town, IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) from one end to the other, down Oxford Road past Reading West, beautifully quiet and smooth.  The buses were painted an attractive purple.

We seem to be turning the clock back with local and long distance transport and I shall be interested how many people agree with II on his third option, it needs local knowledge probably.

Stapleton Road for the Cardiff to Brightons, anyone?   Cheesy
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #1188 on: February 12, 2013, 15:44:55 »

Another route for through XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) services in the event of problems with Westbury Line Jn is to run through one of P13/14/15 and then via the Southern underpass, and reverse beyond Spur Jn to reach the down main.  The route used by that early morning XC ECS (Empty Coaching Stock) move I found a couple of weeks back, but in the opposite direction.

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #1189 on: February 12, 2013, 21:40:21 »

Will the "Rear Clear" stop boards (not a term I've come across before) on each platform have any space beween them - will there be any kind of overlap distance between the board facing London at the A end and the board facing Bristol at the B end?

And are Drivers and Driver Managers now happy with this arrangement - you indicated before that there was a bit of a problem with this.

Yes, there will be space as they are specifically there to facilitate two trains at each end of the platform.  The platform lengths are suitable for 12 carriages of 23m length I believe, but the overlap needed with these 'Rear Clear' boards means that two 6-car trains can't be accommodated at the same time.  That's a shame as it means that a 6-car Turbo can't share a platform with a 6-car Voyager (should they be lengthened).

This also means possible confusion for a driver arriving with a terminating service which heads back out the same direction as the stopping point with up to 5-cars is the 'Rear Clear' marker with the  6-car stop much further down the platform.  It remains to be seen as to whether there are any incidents as a result of this non-standardised method of working.

'Rear Clear' marker boards will also be appearing on platforms 7, 8 and 9, with the only through platform not getting them (for the time being) is 10 as trains from London won't be able to be signalled into that platform until a later date.

Concern has also been raised about the 'Closing In' signals, as not only is it very rare to get a red signal so close to the end of the platform, but in the case of empty trains leaving the depot from the east end connection, a single yellow aspect can be displayed at the departure signal complete with a platform number, despite the fact that the train isn't actually signalled into that platform but only as far as the 'Closing In' signal.  In my mind, that is asking for trouble.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2013, 11:57:59 by IndustryInsider » Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #1190 on: February 12, 2013, 21:54:00 »

Another route for through XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) services in the event of problems with Westbury Line Jn is to run through one of P13/14/15 and then via the Southern underpass, and reverse beyond Spur Jn to reach the down main.  The route used by that early morning XC ECS (Empty Coaching Stock) move I found a couple of weeks back, but in the opposite direction.

That would only be possible with an ECS service, not with passengers still on the train as per the other three options.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #1191 on: February 13, 2013, 01:02:48 »

Is that because of a lack of signals?

Paul
Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #1192 on: February 13, 2013, 09:14:50 »

Will the "Rear Clear" stop boards (not a term I've come across before) on each platform have any space beween them - will there be any kind of overlap distance between the board facing London at the A end and the board facing Bristol at the B end?

And are Drivers and Driver Managers now happy with this arrangement - you indicated before that there was a bit of a problem with this.

Yes, there will be space as they are specifically there to facilitate two trains at each end of the platform.  The platform lengths are suitable for 12 carriages of 23m length I believe, but the overlap needed with these 'Rear Clear' boards means that two 6-car trains can't be accommodated at the same time.  That's a shame as it means that a 6-car Turbo can't share a platform with a 6-car Voyager (should they be lengthened).

This also means possible confusion for a driver arriving with a terminating service which heads back out the same direction as the stopping point with up to 5-cars is the 'Rear Clear' marker with the  6-car stop much further down the platform.  It remains to be seen as to whether there are any incidents as a result of this non-standardised method of working.

'Rear Clear' marker boards will also be appearing on platforms 7, 8 and 9, with the only through platform not getting them (for the time being) is 10 as trains from London won't be able to be signalled into that platform until a later date.

Concern has also been raised about the 'Closing In' signals, as not only is it very rare to get a red signal so close to the end of the platform, but in the case of empty trains leaving the depot from the west end connection, a single yellow aspect can be displayed at the departure signal complete with a platform number, despite the fact that the train isn't actually signalled into that platform but only as far as the 'Closing In' signal.  In my mind, that is asking for trouble.

Are these arrangements (ie A and B platforms) only temporay until the completion of all the layout changes?  It would be surprising if they were permanent.  It's a long time since I did a "Safe working of trains" course, but intuitively they don't seem right.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #1193 on: February 13, 2013, 10:14:17 »

Are these arrangements (ie A and B platforms) only temporay until the completion of all the layout changes?  It would be surprising if they were permanent.  It's a long time since I did a "Safe working of trains" course, but intuitively they don't seem right.

I'm sure they'll be permanent.  Not doing so loses the capacity increase over the old set up (on the relief side - as P13/14 would effectively become just the replacements for the London facing bays).  And as I've mentioned in previous posts, the basic method of double ended divided working has been in place at (for example) Southampton for many years - and safely as far as I am aware.

Paul
« Last Edit: February 13, 2013, 10:20:17 by paul7755 » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #1194 on: February 13, 2013, 12:00:26 »

Is that because of a lack of signals?

In a way, yes.  Shunts via Spur Junction involve ground position signals not main aspect signals, so can't be used under normal circumstances with passenger trains.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #1195 on: February 13, 2013, 14:58:50 »

Are these arrangements (ie A and B platforms) only temporay until the completion of all the layout changes?  It would be surprising if they were permanent.  It's a long time since I did a "Safe working of trains" course, but intuitively they don't seem right.

I'm sure they'll be permanent.  Not doing so loses the capacity increase over the old set up (on the relief side - as P13/14 would effectively become just the replacements for the London facing bays).  And as I've mentioned in previous posts, the basic method of double ended divided working has been in place at (for example) Southampton for many years - and safely as far as I am aware.

Paul

Take a look at Railway Group Standard GKRT0044 (you can just Google it).  The Group Standard (which does not apply retrospectively to stations such as Bristol and Southampton etc, so they should not be quoted as a precedent for Reading) refers to platform sharing and the signalling of trains on to occupied lines.  It specifically states (4.2.2)  that new platform sharing arangements should only be considered if it is not reasonably practicable to use mid platform signals, or any other measure to avoid it (eg timetabling)

I'm surprised that NR» (Network Rail - home page) got away with not providing mid-platform signals as clearly it would have been straightforward to incorporate them into the initial design.   So was there a specification error for the signalling? Was the manner in which the station would need to operate fully understood when the signalling system was specified?

 
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #1196 on: February 13, 2013, 15:37:06 »

Understood.

NR» (Network Rail - home page) do cross refer to that standard in the NCN about the station operations, as follows:

Quote
Standard GK/RT0044 Controls for signalling a train onto an occupied line mandates a number of conditions to be considered when reviewing the need for permissive working and its safe application. Whilst the signalling has functionality to allow for permissive moves to be signalled into the platforms as outlined in the Network Change the usage and availability is determined on operational risk and the need to use. A risk workshop chaired by an external provider was held and FGW (First Great Western) representatives were in attendance. The level of Permissive Working agreed was an output of that risk workshop and took into account a number of factors including distance of signal to platform, speed of approach, signalling controls, approach view of train stationary in platform, whether services are planned to be used permissively etc. The new Platforms 12-15 have close up signals which allow permissive moves to be controlled far more effectively than Platforms 7-11 hence the variance in permissive working allowed. The level of permissive working agreed is more favourable than the current situation and the standard places a requirement on operators to try and eliminate/mitigate the use of permissive working and satisfactorily control the risks.

Not sure what that all means though...

Paul

« Last Edit: February 13, 2013, 15:47:41 by paul7755 » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #1197 on: February 13, 2013, 16:00:10 »

Not sure what that all means though...

I think it means that "we'll use a lot of waffle to try and convince everyone that it will be an acceptable method of working under the group standard regulations."  It may well be - we'll see.  Most of the concern seems to be about the SPAD (Signal Passed At Danger) risk of giving a driver a signal with a platform number indicator (either a 15, 14, or 13) when they aren't actually signalled into that platform (that's the east end depot signal I referred to earlier - T1708).

By the way, to answer a question I posed a few weeks ago, the temporary connection from Platform 8 (which will become the Down Main Loop) to and from the Down Main Line will be restricted to 20mph.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #1198 on: February 14, 2013, 11:27:48 »

We do seem to be getting into a muddle with signalling.

In semaphore days there were three types of indication you could get on a subsiduary signals (short arm two two parralel red stripes) under a stop arm. Depeding on use they could show S for Shunt Ahead into the section, W Warning: Line clear junction blocked and C Calling: On into an occupied section. A W  signal was used regularly between Tulse Hill and Gypsy Hill for Crystal Palace bound trains. Calling on signals were used at places like Staines every half hour to join Windosr and Weybridge portions. Early colur light position signals could show S or C when coupled with a stop signal. W becomes redundant because you'd get  single yellow on the main aspect.

I'm not sure I like the implications of II's point above.

"Most of the concern seems to be about the SPAD (Signal Passed At Danger) risk of giving a driver a signal with a platform number indicator (either a 15, 14, or 13) when they aren't actually signalled into that platform (that's the east end depot signal I referred to earlier - T1708)."

Not sure I understand as I'm still getting used to modern drawings. 1708 seems to be two headed signal 1708 on left  and 1708 CA on right (facing). 1708 seems to be four aspect signal with three aspects in bottom light and a single yellow above, with a square box above that with a 3, whereas 1708CA is reversed with the 3 aspect at the top and single yellow at the bottom.

Are points 8446 ad 8446B a double slip if so trains from the depot only have access to 15.14 and 13 platforms? Plus there are  stop signals 1706, 1704 and 1702 protecting platforms 15.14.13 between 1708 and the platforms. Perhaps to be clear 1708 should show DRL (13) URL (14) and UR (15) being the running lines the train is routed.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #1199 on: February 14, 2013, 13:04:25 »

Are points 8446 ad 8446B a double slip if so trains from the depot only have access to 15.14 and 13 platforms? Plus there are  stop signals 1706, 1704 and 1702 protecting platforms 15.14.13 between 1708 and the platforms. Perhaps to be clear 1708 should show DRL (13) URL (14) and UR (15) being the running lines the train is routed.

Yup, that's correct and yup that's what I would have thought would be more sensible.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 78 79 [80] 81 82 ... 230
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page