Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 29 Mar 2024
- Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 14:15:57 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 230
  Print  
Author Topic: Reading Station improvements  (Read 1356767 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18896



View Profile
« Reply #150 on: October 19, 2010, 22:56:12 »

I totally agree, willc. Just offering up the advice for those of us, in the Bristol area, who do want to take a HST (High Speed Train) into Waterloo.  Wink Grin
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #151 on: October 20, 2010, 09:22:36 »

But Paul raised the point in the context of SWT (South West Trains)'s clear advice to Bristol passengers, which was to use FGW (First Great Western)'s services from Bristol during the period affected, ie, don't bother trying to travel route Salisbury from the Bristol area at this time.

This business of fares is getting way out of hand. Here we have a major junction closed for period and they can't even work out a sensible fare structure to get people to/from London and Bristol/Wales/West.

It seems to me that should be a special set of fares from all FGW stations West of Reading to London  valid on any train or combination of trains that takes you to/from a London terminus.

They should be considerably cheaper than present anytime fares to compensate for the longer journey times and extra changes.

This should also apply to other thread re Chiltern diverting via Didcot.
« Last Edit: October 20, 2010, 17:32:33 by eightf48544 » Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #152 on: October 20, 2010, 10:29:20 »

It might sound like a nice idea but you do say "a sensible fare structure" then suggest something that would only add further complication. Don't forget that in the middle of it all, the line through Reading does reopen for New Year's Eve, so would you then revert to normal fares for the day?

And Chiltern need to find the money from somewhere to pay FGW (First Great Western) for the use of its trains during closures (it's their project, not Network Rail's). Not that there is any consistent pattern to those closures, so a sensible fare structure is the last thing you would end up with. The following scenarios can all apply, with all sorts of journey times, depending on the circumstances. Chiltern trains divert to Oxford or Didcot from Banbury, passengers are advised to use XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) to get to Oxford, trains serving Oxfordshire and the West Midlands are diverted via Aylesbury with a reverse at Princes Risborough, plus all sort of bus/train routings, depending on which parts of the line are closed.

In all this, by far the most important thing is to keep people on trains, whatever the route or journey time or fare, rather than putting them into buses, which surveys consistently show is something people dislike. And FGW and Chiltern seem to be doing their level best to achieve that (assisted by SWT (South West Trains) in the case of the Waterloo diversions).
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #153 on: October 20, 2010, 17:33:11 »

It might sound like a nice idea but you do say "a sensible fare structure" then suggest something that would only add further complication. Don't forget that in the middle of it all, the line through Reading does reopen for New Year's Eve, so would you then revert to normal fares for the day.

What I should have said is one fare somewhere between the Advanced and Offpeak should be offered for any applicable journey for the whole of the disruption no matter what route or time of day. It would apply on New Year's Eve, with it being free after midnight.

And Chiltern need to find the money from somewhere to pay FGW (First Great Western) for the use of its trains during closures (it's their project, not Network Rail's).

That's just bean counting, due to stupid way railways are organised and  funded.

Not that there is any consistent pattern to those closures, so a sensible fare structure is the last thing you would end up with.

To my mind it doesn't matter what the pattern of closures are if the effect is that you cannot make a journey you would normally be able to make without being diverted, extra changes, longer journey times  or worse still put on buses then the same cheaper fare can apply for all such disrupted journeys.

In all this, by far the most important thing is to keep people on trains, whatever the route or journey time or fare, rather than putting them into buses, which surveys consistently show is something people dislike. And FGW and Chiltern seem to be doing their level best to achieve that (assisted by SWT (South West Trains) in the case of the Waterloo diversions).


Couldn't agree more so why not let them travel cheaply to compensate them for their loyalty.



Edited to remove response from quoted post. bignosemac
« Last Edit: October 20, 2010, 19:42:41 by bignosemac » Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #154 on: October 20, 2010, 18:40:08 »

So when the operators' costs are substantially increased through extra mileage, hire of buses, etc, you think they should cut the revenue they are generating? Never mind that the disruption is likely to put off some potential custom anyway? It all has to be paid for somehow and I don't think the Government is going to be offering to help just now.

The majority of this work is taking place at times when travel is on off-peak (I am using the term generally, in the way it used to be understood by sane and sensible people, not the dubious way the rail industry now employs it) or advance fares anyway.
Logged
XPT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 163


View Profile
« Reply #155 on: October 24, 2010, 15:12:03 »

I'm still trying to work out what to do for my trip to London and back especially for these diverstions.   Shame about there being only a limited number of services which offer the cheap advance fares.   

If I get the 1130 from Bristol Temple Meads, I can get a ^10 single.   Scheduled to arrive in London Paddington 1437.  I could then possibly get the 1526(albeit at a cost of ^28 single) from London Waterloo to Westbury, but I think this could be cutting it fine a bit whether I'll be able to get there in time.  Getting the 1626 may be a safer option.  But the thing is then it will be practically dark at that time and with the HST (High Speed Train) ultra bright carriage lighting as it is nowadays, I won't be able to see a thing of the diverted route the train is taking!

Alternatively I could take the journey the other way around, Bristol-Westbury, Westbury-London Waterloo-Paddington-Bristol.  And be able to get a ^10 single on one of the afternoon services from London Paddington.  Thing is though if I get on at Westbury, these services will originate from either Plymouth or Penzance.  So I might not get the convenience of having a window seat and facing the direction of travel, as there'll be plenty of people allready on those trains! I see though there is a good value fare of just ^9.50 on the 0718 service from Westbury.   Though this would involve a walk of about an hour and 20 minutes to Temple Meads that morning.  To get the 0605 service to Westbury, arriving there at 0641.  But if that service gets cancelled that would ruin that plan.  The next train is at 0640 and scheduled to arrive Westbury at 0716, just TWO minutes before the 0718 to London Waterloo which is cutting it fine a little!

Is there likely to be many people travelling between the West Country/Bristol and London on the 27th and 28th December?

Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #156 on: October 24, 2010, 20:28:17 »

Yes, but not that early!
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #157 on: October 24, 2010, 20:38:06 »

Me? I think I'm going to start at Oxford to Padd, Waterloo to Westbury to Bristol TM(resolve) to Oxford....
Logged
XPT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 163


View Profile
« Reply #158 on: October 24, 2010, 23:06:07 »

Finally decided what I'm going to do, and just about to book up.  On Tuesday 28th, I will get the 0601 service from Bristol Parkway-London Paddington. Fare just ^10 single. This will be a service from Swansea, but even then I shoudn't think there'd be too many passengers onboard at that early hour on a Bank Holiday!  So should easily get a window seat. At that time it will be pitch black outside, but at around 7:30ish, just around the time the train reaches Banbury daylight will start breaking allowing me to see the diverted route we're taking.  The 1 hour 50 minute non-stop journey after Oxford will be particularly interesting.

Upon arrival in London at 0907, I'll then just have a bit of a ride somewhere in the London area.  Maybe just a trip up to Harrow & Wealdestone and back on the Bakerloo line 1972 stock.  Then to Waterloo for the 1233 service to Westbury.  Upon arrival in Westbury there will be a short wait for my onward train back to Bristol.  Fare ^24.50.

That's ^34.50 for the total return fare to London with FGW (First Great Western).  I certainly see that as not too bad atall, especially as it's two special *possibly*
once in a lifetime journeys.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2010, 10:00:22 by XPT » Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #159 on: October 24, 2010, 23:09:09 »

Good luck with that, XPT - and please do post some pictures here!  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18896



View Profile
« Reply #160 on: October 24, 2010, 23:36:48 »

I'm hoping to do Taunton to Waterloo on the 27th then back to Bristol via Banbury. 27th being the day I can escape from the family after Christmas!

Not making too many confirmed plans until nearer the time as life at the moment seems to be getting in the way of 'messing about on trains'.  Undecided
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #161 on: October 26, 2010, 12:13:38 »

Meanwhile, there's still absolutely no sign of any physical works at Banbury connected with this turnback provision for platforms 1 and 2.  Only five months to go, so I would expect things to start happening imminently, or it'll be a rush job!

Two shiny signal posts have now appeared at the south end of platforms one and two.  Covered up, but from the counter-weights already fitted it looks like they're going to be semaphore signals - I wonder how many brand new semaphore signals get installed these days!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #162 on: October 26, 2010, 12:15:06 »

Definitely semaphore, debate rages as to which type though!
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #163 on: October 26, 2010, 15:08:10 »

*fingers crossed, hoping for upper quadrants to upset the Brunel posse*

Wink
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #164 on: October 26, 2010, 15:48:40 »

Apparently there is rule as to whether a new semaphore is upper or lower quadrant. It is apparently  determined by counting the number of existing signals of each type and providing the type in the majority.



 

 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 230
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page