Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:15 18 Apr 2024
* Dubai airport delays persist after UAE storm
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
18th Apr (2018)
SEWWEB leaflet launched and Aztec West (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Moreton-In-Marsh
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
18:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
18:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
18:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:14 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
19:46 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
22:24 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
23:08 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
16:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
19:05 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:50 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
Delayed
16:18 London Paddington to Swansea
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:02 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 18, 2024, 18:18:02 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[185] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[46] Signage - not making it easy ...
[23] IETs at Melksham
[21] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[19] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
[18] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)  (Read 6152 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« on: July 25, 2010, 21:47:09 »

From The Telegraph:

Quote
Britain's once-threatened branch lines are enjoying a boom thanks to 'staycation' holidays.

Figures compiled for The Sunday Telegraph show many routes earmarked for closure in the 1960s Beeching cuts are enjoying annual passenger growth well above the average across the railways, with rises of up to 55 per cent. The increases have been attributed to tourism traffic as recession-hit Britons opt for traditional seaside holidays instead of flying abroad. Seven of the 10 fastest-growing branch lines serve seaside resorts. Traffic on the scenic St Erth to St Ives line in Cornwall, recommended for closure by Dr Beeching, rose 15.5 per cent in 2009/10 compared to the previous year. The number of passenger journeys between Preston and Blackpool South rose by 13.8 per cent.

Alex Veitch, Integrated Transport Manager for the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here)), said: "There is no doubt that the 'staycation' trend of holidaying at home has been a major factor. These branch line figures match existing research that shows summer traffic was significantly up at tourism 'destination' stations such Edinburgh and Oxford. With more holidays in Britain, many resorts are busier and it seems people have realised it is less hassle to get the train and the journey can be part of the holiday experience."

Official figures, due to be published on Thursday, are expected to show the number of rail passenger journeys in Britain in 2009/10 was similar to the previous year, ending almost 15 years of spectacular growth. But although the number of commuter journeys has dropped during the recession, branch lines have enjoyed remarkable growth, according to statistics supplied to The Sunday Telegraph by ATOC. Traffic between Par and Newquay in Cornwall grew 55 per cent after demand from stay-at-home holidaymakers prompted First Great Western to add direct daily trains from London.

Passenger journeys on the line between Oxenholme and Windermere in the Lake District, once slated for closure by Dr Beeching, rose 9.9 per cent.

Julian Crow, regional manager of First Great Western, said: "All the signs are that this summer is going to be even busier than last year when we saw significant increases. It is great news for everyone. In St Ives, which has narrow streets, the growth means more visitors than ever are arriving by rail rather than adding to road congestion."

The success has also been attributed to Community Rail Partnerships in which rail companies, local councils and volunteers join to promote passenger interest and investment in improvements.

On the Truro to Falmouth line, which had the third-highest growth, traffic rose 37.8 per cent after an extra platform was built to allow more trains.

"The fact is, many branch lines are providing their best ever service," said Richard Burningham, manager of the Devon & Cornwall Rail Partnership. "There is this notion of a golden age of steam trains but St Ives and Falmouth have never had a more frequent service in their history and people are starting to notice that and make use of their local train service, not just on holiday but throughout the year."



The 10 fastest-growing Community Rail Lines (2009/10 percentage increase over 2008/09)

Par ^ Newquay (First Great Western (FGW (First Great Western))) 54.80%

Derby ^ Matlock (East Midlands) 42%

Truro ^ Falmouth (FGW) 37.80%

Bristol Temple Meads ^ Severn Beach (FGW) 16.90%

St Erth ^ St Ives (FGW) 15.50%

Preston ^ Blackpool South (Northern) 13.80%

Liskeard ^ Looe (FGW) 13.10%

Exeter ^ Barnstaple (FGW) 11.60%

Oxenholme ^ Windermere (First TransPennine Express) 9.90%

Plymouth ^ Gunnislake (FGW) 9.10%
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2010, 00:43:33 »

For those who need a reason to increase rolling stock in the Great Western region see the the stats. Imagine if there were more through services from other parts of the country to the regions that are having large growth through XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) then we could be seeing a very profitable and useful summer service to many areas. Sadly a lost opportunity in the current day and age
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2010, 01:00:20 »

Not that they have the rolling stock but I wonder what would happen if fgw applied to run a service from the southwest to the north
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2010, 15:17:00 »

Newquay to Newcastle could be a TPE (Trans Pennine Express) route! Grin
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2010, 16:08:31 »

you know what... the cost of a couple of loco hauled sets could be shared along with the revenue if fgw and tpe worked together, it may even get approved seeing that xc doesnt seem that interested in getting any more people on its trains
Logged
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2010, 17:19:34 »

you know what... the cost of a couple of loco hauled sets could be shared along with the revenue if fgw and tpe worked together, it may even get approved seeing that xc doesnt seem that interested in getting any more people on its trains

In theory yes, but of course the fragmented system requires completely sepearte accounts for both companies so can be a minefield to sort out. The only way it could work is if First created a subsidury for such services working in "parternship" with TPE (Trans Pennine Express) and FGW (First Great Western) that is accounted completely sepreately for from the franchises keeping the civil servants happy
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: July 26, 2010, 17:27:39 »

they already have.... but given the fun they had with the taunton to cardiff service that may not work lol
Logged
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2010, 17:49:12 »

they already have.... but given the fun they had with the taunton to cardiff service that may not work lol

Actually they do not as of fairly recently as it was First sold GBRF hence the change of contract for the loco diagram to DBS» (Deutsch Bahn Schenker - UK (United Kingdom) website) as there is no more politics involved
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2010, 18:01:25 »

ahh sorry i idnt realise that it had been sold, i thought part of the swap over was the very poor performance of the 57's
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2010, 19:29:37 »

Hats off to FGW (First Great Western) for those increases!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40783



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2010, 12:18:13 »

Further report ... Rail News

http://rail-news.com/2010/08/12/4748/

Rather confirms "increase a rubbish service to one that's even half decent and they'll use it" ... highlights for Severn Beach and Newquay services.  It's clearly not just holiday / seaside stuff; I don't think there are many bucket and spaders at Severn Beach are there?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TheLastMinute
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 188


This really isn't worth reading.


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2010, 12:54:16 »

How dare you cast such aspersions on the Beach!  Shocked

Oh, hang on a sec.... 


^ Copyright Linda Bailey and 
licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence


Ahhh, I see.  Grin
« Last Edit: August 12, 2010, 13:04:19 by TheLastMinute » Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2010, 14:56:15 »

A mildly amusing typo in that article (my emphasis, obviously!)

Quote
This surge, which was revealed in the research gathered by the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here)), has been put down to recession-hit Brits opting for beach holidays over fights abroad as well as investment to increase the frequency and capacity of local services.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2010, 17:17:02 »

I visited the beach with recently for "leisure".  The walk along the sea wall has the advantage of being pushchair friendly ad I was wanting to see if any evidence of the pump houses for the tunnel were evident having watched a BTF about the tunnel.  Could be a very nice spot without the M4, but "beach" is misleading.
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2010, 19:39:44 »

i have a ticket in my wallet for this branch however i stupidly bought the ticket (only ^1.50) before checking the times
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page