Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 28 Mar 2024
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
- Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
06:50 Westbury to Weymouth
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:30 Liskeard to Looe
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:15:29 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[117] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[80] Return of the BRUTE?
[63] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[27] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Re: Cheltenham Spa to Paddington  (Read 14266 times)
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 22, 2010, 00:11:18 »

There simply isn't the volume of traffic on either route to support the kind of thing you suggest - if there was, then FGW (First Great Western), and BR (British Rail(ways)) before it, would have been running timetables with the mix of trains you suggest.

The proposition that you should bypass Gloucester is just bizarre if you're trying to make an hourly London service pay its way.

And define a 'smaller' station. The town of Charlbury has a population of about 3,000, yet its station generates more journeys each year than Evesham, with a population nearing 25,000. Remove stops at what may on the face of it seem 'smaller' stations on the Cotswold Line and you would end up with very empty, unprofitable fast trains to Worcester, hence the current service pattern, calling at 'smaller' stations along the way, so that it actually pays its way.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 22, 2010, 23:52:41 »

I have split off the Cotswold line discussion that flared up here and merged it with a previous thread discussing exactly the same issue on that board...if you're looking for it you'll find it from here onwards:
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=4881.msg62154#msg62154
Logged
Deltic
Full Member
***
Posts: 95


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: February 24, 2010, 14:44:03 »

There simply isn't the volume of traffic on either route to support the kind of thing you suggest - if there was, then FGW (First Great Western), and BR (British Rail(ways)) before it, would have been running timetables with the mix of trains you suggest.

The proposition that you should bypass Gloucester is just bizarre if you're trying to make an hourly London service pay its way.

Perhaps I didn't make clear what I was suggesting.  At the moment, Swindon to Cheltenham takes 1 hour and a couple of minutes.  Apart from the two hourly through services from Paddington it requires 2 units to operate this service, each of which is running for barely more than 50% of the time.  If the service were to split Swindon, all stations to Gloucester (50 minutes each way) and Swindon, non-stop to Cheltenham Spa (about the same), we could run the same frequency of service with the same number of units and provide a shorter and therefore more-attractive service between Swindon and Cheltenham. 

So far as missing out the stop at Gloucester goes, I am only advocating this because it is possible to maintain the frequency of Swindon - Gloucester and Swindon - Cheltenham with the same stock as is used for the current combined service.  However for this to be possible we would need to recast the through Paddington - Cheltenham service and probably require the double line to be reinstated from Swindon to Kemble.

My experience of Cotswold line cancellations on Monday led me to wonder whether extending the Swindon to Cheltenham non-stops to Worcester might give a faster overall journey time than the Cotswold line.  I can already hear the pitchforks being sharpened and torches being lit! Grin
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2010, 16:38:04 »

There simply isn't the volume of traffic on either route to support the kind of thing you suggest - if there was, then FGW (First Great Western), and BR (British Rail(ways)) before it, would have been running timetables with the mix of trains you suggest.

The proposition that you should bypass Gloucester is just bizarre if you're trying to make an hourly London service pay its way.

Perhaps I didn't make clear what I was suggesting.  At the moment, Swindon to Cheltenham takes 1 hour and a couple of minutes.  Apart from the two hourly through services from Paddington it requires 2 units to operate this service, each of which is running for barely more than 50% of the time.  If the service were to split Swindon, all stations to Gloucester (50 minutes each way) and Swindon, non-stop to Cheltenham Spa (about the same), we could run the same frequency of service with the same number of units and provide a shorter and therefore more-attractive service between Swindon and Cheltenham. 

So far as missing out the stop at Gloucester goes, I am only advocating this because it is possible to maintain the frequency of Swindon - Gloucester and Swindon - Cheltenham with the same stock as is used for the current combined service.  However for this to be possible we would need to recast the through Paddington - Cheltenham service and probably require the double line to be reinstated from Swindon to Kemble.

My experience of Cotswold line cancellations on Monday led me to wonder whether extending the Swindon to Cheltenham non-stops to Worcester might give a faster overall journey time than the Cotswold line.  I can already hear the pitchforks being sharpened and torches being lit! Grin


Nope - there used to be one peak hour service that went PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) to WOS» (Worcester Shrub Hill - next trains) via cheltenham and it takes longer!
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
Deltic
Full Member
***
Posts: 95


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: February 24, 2010, 16:42:40 »

Yes but that was stopping at all stations, including reversal at Gloucester.  I'm proposing a non-stop Swindon - Cheltenham, which could be extended to Worcester, perhaps while the redoubling works are taking place.

We would probably need Swindon to Kemble doubled first in that case Roll Eyes
Logged
pullman
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 15


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2010, 22:34:52 »

If Cheltenham Spa had an hourly service to London, (direct) it could call at all stations in the Stroud valley including Gloucester, but making up time by running non stop Swindon-London or non stop Swindon-Reading rather than non stop Swindon-Cheltenham Spa as it would miss all the Stroud and Gloucester commuters. plus Swindon-Gloucester isn't fit for 90mph+ running.I think  Wink
Logged
Deltic
Full Member
***
Posts: 95


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: June 07, 2010, 16:54:53 »

Yes, but it's not direct is it.  My point is that it takes more than an hour to get from Swindon to Cheltenham, calling at all stations and reversing at Gloucester.  The distance by road is only 30 miles so the timing is uncompetitive.  With the present timetable, the units are standing at Swindon for over an hour and at Cheltenham for about 45 minutes so they are not being used very intensively.  If one unit runs Swindon, all stations to Gloucester and the other Swindon to Cheltenham non-stop, both could be accomplished in about 50 minutes so you would not need any more units and have reduced the journey time to Cheltenham by about 15 minutes.

The main flaw with my idea is that, because Gloucester has lost all of its long-distance Cross Country services, it would make connections more difficult from Kemble, Stroud, Stonehouse and Gloucester to the North.  There would probably also be pathing difficulties between Standish Junction and Cheltenham.  I just think Cheltenham should have a quicker service than the equivalent of 25 mph from Swindon.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: June 08, 2010, 00:22:48 »

...it could call at all stations in the Stroud valley including Gloucester, but making up time by running non stop Swindon-London or non stop Swindon-Reading rather than non stop Swindon-Cheltenham Spa

So it would be exactly the same as now but without the stop at Didcot then? Thereby saving all of about 7 minutes and removing the connection oppportunity for Oxford.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page