Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:15 28 Mar 2024
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
17:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
Additional 18:25 Shalford to Reading
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:18 Newbury to London Paddington
18:19 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:25 Shalford to Reading
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 19:20:08 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Security on the Station Platform  (Read 9336 times)
Commuting Bookworm
Full Member
***
Posts: 57



View Profile Email
« on: November 02, 2010, 13:50:04 »

This morning at 0645 on Reading station there were 3 un accompanied peices of luggage. Whilst I stood some distance away to verify, there was no one attached, I counted 4 station staff who walked past this luggage and did not bat an eye lid. Once I established the risk, I waitied to speak to a station member of staff ( I had to wait until she had released train out of station) then explained to her my concern about the luggage. She thanked me kindly and I went on my way to catch my train.

It makes me laugh that there are all these tanoy messages warning us to keep an eye out for anything suspicious and tell some one if we see anything, yet this obviously does not apply to staff? In the current precarious security situation we find ourselves in, this seems a bit barmy to me. What do other people think?
Logged
Fish
Full Member
***
Posts: 30


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2010, 00:00:34 »

Could you please advise me which platform so I can identify the staff by checking the CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) and if necessary rebriefing them?

Of course, we take security seriously and staff often identify/remove unattended items.  It is true, however, that when working on a busy platform with many other duties to attend to, an "normal" looking piece of luggage can possibly be overlooked for a time.  That is why we have the regular announcements urging passengers to assist us in highlighting anything which looks unusual or suspicious, and I thank you for being sufficiently vigilant in bringing it to the attention of our staff on this occasion.

I can assure you that the whole station is fully checked at least every hour 24/7 by our staff and detailed records are kept.  Additionally, we are subject to frequent spot checks by TRANSEC who "hide" packages and report on how long it takes us to find them.  999 times out of 1000, luggage such as you saw will be reunited with people who have popped into a shop, or possibly boarded a train and left it behind on the platform, however we are all aware it only takes one slip to have a serious incident.
Logged
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2042



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2010, 07:36:51 »

I'm guessing it was platforms 1 and 2 given that that Commuting Bookworm filed this under "Reading to Basingstoke".

I have to say, I use Reading station at least once or twice a week and have very often seen staff standing next to odd bits of luggage looking around pointedly for its owner in order to have a word with them when they turn up, so based on my observation I'd say the above was an isolated if very unfortunate incident. All credit to you for jumping in and underlining the seriousness of it though, Fish.
Logged
Commuting Bookworm
Full Member
***
Posts: 57



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2010, 08:38:25 »

Good morning, sorry only just logged on. The left luggage was just to the right of the door of the upper crust resturant on platform 4.  I walked past it at approx 0650 yesterday. I even saw a cleaner sweep the floor around it, I think. I realise that every one is busy, but when it goes boom, it will be too late to say "but we have security measures in place, how did that happen?". Will the families of the victims understand? Why do we always have to wait for a disaster before taking preventative measures? 
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2010, 10:20:00 »

I'm surprised to be honest - especially given the recent plane packages everyone should be very vigilant.  That being said, it's possible that the owners of the luggage had asked permission to a member to leave it there for a short while?  Unlikely, but possible.

Luggage left on platforms rarely triggers a station evacuation though as it does happen frequently and doesn't match the HOT profile that staff follow when deciding what to do with something unattended.  H = Hidden, O = Obviously suspicious (i.e. wiring visible), or T = not Typical of its location (i.e. a piece of luggage left in a luggage rack is rarely treated as suspicious).
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2010, 14:49:55 »

when it goes boom, it will be too late to say "but we have security measures in place, how did that happen?". Will the families of the victims understand? Why do we always have to wait for a disaster before taking preventative measures? 

Tricky one this. Firstly we don't wait for a disaster before taking preventative measures - there have been very few bins on stations for decades, we've been warned about leaving unattended luggage etc etc. Invoking emotional arguments about "the families of the victims" isn't a sound basis on which to weigh up the risks involved and make a decision.

Clearly I don't know the exact circumstances of what happened, and it sounds like someone may have temporarily taken their eye off the ball. But it's a fact of life that people are fundamentally forgetful and will always leave bits and piece of luggage lying around, if only for a few minutes. If railway stations were evacuated every time someone left a bag lying around, the system would grind to a halt, pure and simple. That way terrorists (regardless of their particular cause) have already won without actually having to do anything. It's a fine balancing act, but the simple fact is that almost all the time such packages are just passengers' luggage.

I'm interested to know what your suggestions are for what might be done differently, if you think we're always waiting until a disaster happens before reacting, Commuting Bookworm. It's certainly possible to go too far the other way - if you try travelling on Amtrak in the US, especially around major holidays, you'll often find major stations bristling with police, many of them with large snarling dogs walking up and down queues of passengers sniffing luggage, pulling people out of line to inspect them and their belongings etc etc. Amtrak also has a policy in place where they will refuse to carry anyone who does not consent to having their bag searched when asked. As far as I can tell, these ridiculous over-reactions achieve very little other than "security theatre" and making you feel like you're travelling in some kind of police state.
Logged
Commuting Bookworm
Full Member
***
Posts: 57



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2010, 15:04:32 »

Inspector Blakey, I am am not for 1 minute suggesting that the station be evacuated. My concern in this instance was the fact that several Rail employees walked past the baggage, and not even stopped to look or ask if it belonged to someone. I am concerned that it took me, a passanger, who could quite easily of been in too much of a hurry to report it to a platform manager, to report the concern. I stood for a good 10 mins either watching to see if it belonged to someone, or trying to wait until they had dispatched the train on Platform 4, before I could get someones attention.

The real thing that concerned me was the employees paid no attention to a potential security risk. 
Logged
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 03, 2010, 15:49:00 »

Bookworm you sound just like a transec inspector as that is exactly what they do!
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 03, 2010, 15:59:38 »

well I can't  comment on what you experienced, but I have observed FGW (First Great Western) staff at Paddington and Reading being proactive in dealing with suspect bags, so I'd agree with Phil that they are pretty hot on security usually.

Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2010, 16:25:25 »

It also needs to be pointed out that it's not just 'unattended items' that should be considered a potential security risk.

The four bombs used in the London attacks on 7 July 2005 were all contained in rucksacks which were being worn or carried by the suicide bombers, right up to the moment each one was detonated.

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Fish
Full Member
***
Posts: 30


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2010, 00:16:16 »

As I said before, and others have attested, we are generally very vigilant with such items.  It is true, however, that whilst we have to be vigilant all the time, a prospective terrorist has to be lucky just once.

Unfortunately, members of the public are often very forgetful about their luggage and at Reading we get dozens of "lost" (or should that be "found"?) bags and cases every week, not to mention the mobiles and wallets, which must be replicated to varying degrees at every station in the country.  And I certainly wouldn't wish to see the Amtrak method here.

Thank you for identifying the location and I can now use the CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) and identify any staff in the vicinity and use it as a good example to help them improve on their observation and vigilance.
Logged
Commuting Bookworm
Full Member
***
Posts: 57



View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2010, 08:22:28 »

SDS Pad, is this a compliment or a dig? Not that I mind becuase if me being a busy body, helps to awaken just one member of staff to the dangers and thus potentially stop the next bomb attack, thats cool.

Fish, please don't take it the wrong way, I wasn't having a go at any staff, but just wanted to highlight a weakness in Reading's security proceedures.

Im just a commuter that wants to stay safe and I am prepared to do my bit to enable that to happen.
Logged
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2010, 13:13:01 »

Its a compliment bookworm. We need everybody to be vigilant.

If it wasn't for transec 'testing' us at unannounced times, things wouldn't get done and we'd get complacent!
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2011, 11:44:21 »

Whilst it is well to be cautious regarding unattended luggage, it should be remembered that the present type of terrorists favour manually detonated suicide bombs carried about the person or in vehicles, and not time bombs left in luggage.

This may of course change, but the current threat does not appear to be from unattended luggage.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page