Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:55 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 15:58:50 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Linked Events
  • Last train - Pilning to Wales: October 29, 2016
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 12
  Print  
Author Topic: Pilning - the station, services, viability and closure of down platform - ongoing discussion  (Read 102619 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #60 on: April 12, 2016, 23:23:03 »

This subject has been discussed out on the Coffee Shop forum, in more than one topic, in the past: I'd be happy to move and merge such discussions into one definitive topic (without it needing to reach any particular conclusion, obviously!), if we're all happy with that?

Yes, please Chris - now that we've established that there are very real issues with continining to provide a (usable) train service at Pilning.   You're the merge expert - I'll leave it to you as I often struggle to do it.

Well, I really did walk into that one, didn't I?  Shocked Roll Eyes Grin

Now done: I've moved and merged three topics into this one here.  I've chosen to put this combined topic in our 'campaigns' board, simply because many of the previous posts show some clear feeling that the train service(s) at Pilning should be 'improved'.

However, we can now continue to debate that here, in this ongoing discussion.  Wink

For whatever my opinion is worth, though: I rather reluctantly have to agree with John R in his post above.  Sad
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #61 on: April 13, 2016, 02:19:45 »

Thanks, Chris.

Comment I hear is of development encroaching around the area and possibilities - but whether that is pious hope or realistic looking forward I'm uninformed on and cannot express a valid opinion.   But I do look to options and, yes, question the spending of millions on ramps / lifts for a bridge that would only be required apart from people going out of there way to use it a handful of times per year if that.

Thinking out of the box.

a) Are either of the platform lines reversible - especially the up?
Noting crossover (but maybe gone?) - http://bristol-rail.co.uk/wiki/File:Pilning_Track_Plan_1988.jpg

b) Is there access possible other than by bridge to the second platform (I fear the answer is 'no / no practical without - horror - a level footway crossing')

c) Polesworth solution - or is that to be regarded as an effective and hard to reverse closure by 'the team'?

d) Moving the station "a bit" up the line to where it might be effective. http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14751.msg167185#msg167185
« Last Edit: April 13, 2016, 02:38:51 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: April 13, 2016, 07:11:09 »

Comment I hear is of development encroaching around the area and possibilities - but whether that is pious hope or realistic looking forward I'm uninformed on and cannot express a valid opinion.   
Virtually all this area is in flood zone 3 - the highest risk - with a presumption against further development. So I would be surprised.  There is, however a small area south of the station which is only zone 2. 
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #63 on: April 13, 2016, 10:09:32 »

Polesworth solution - or is that to be regarded as an effective and hard to reverse closure by 'the team'?
Had to look that up. Given that one train each way a week (as Pilning has apparently) is an effective closure anyway, the 'Polesworth solution' (a parlimentary service in one direction only, meaning the other platform can be closed) doesn't sound like much of a change from the current suituation. Of course, it would be better if both platforms can be kept running, but with just a parlimentary service an accessibility-regulations-compliant footbridge is not worthwhile.

I know rolling stock has to be compliant by 2020, but is there actually a legal requirement for stations to become accessible by a certain date (or be closed), or is it just a case of the government making a certain amount of money available each year to make more-and-more stations accessible? In the latter case, Pilning can simply be left at the back of the queue for said funds; by the time all other stations are accessible things might have changed considerably, somebody may even have invented teleportation and the whole railway might be redundant.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: April 13, 2016, 10:34:37 »

Doesn't Pilning's proximity to the vibrant hub of activity that is (Aloha!) Severn Beach make this a non-starter?

Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: April 13, 2016, 18:58:25 »

Given that one train each way a week (as Pilning has apparently) is an effective closure anyway, the 'Polesworth solution' (a parlimentary service in one direction only, meaning the other platform can be closed) doesn't sound like much of a change from the current suituation. Of course, it would be better if both platforms can be kept running, but with just a parlimentary service an accessibility-regulations-compliant footbridge is not worthwhile.

I know rolling stock has to be compliant by 2020, but is there actually a legal requirement for stations to become accessible by a certain date (or be closed), or is it just a case of the government making a certain amount of money available each year to make more-and-more stations accessible? In the latter case, Pilning can simply be left at the back of the queue for said funds; by the time all other stations are accessible things might have changed considerably, somebody may even have invented teleportation and the whole railway might be redundant.

Of course if there was only one platform the footbridge would comply! assuming the entrance is on the remaining platform. 
Logged
Puffing Billy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 113


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: April 13, 2016, 22:42:04 »

The band "One Direction" are said to have been inspired by a visit to Polesworth.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: April 27, 2016, 12:18:12 »

Would a new footbridge actually have to be accessible? It's my understanding of the EA, mostly via a disabled friend, that infrastructure which is a straight replacement for what's already there does not have to be DDA» (Disability Discrimination Act - about)-compliant.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Stroud Valleys
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 19


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: April 27, 2016, 12:40:01 »

it seems ridiculous that a silly station like pilning can remain open and cause problems such as the footbridge as electrification approaches. It's in the middle of nowhere and has less than 100 people visiting it. Seems stupid that its easier to keep it open with a parliamentary train than to close the station completely.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: April 27, 2016, 20:01:33 »

But what if a station with such a limited service did have the potential to be another Melksham.  How do you tell the difference from just the 100 people which is all the railway really sees.  Be careful what you ask for.
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 514


View Profile
« Reply #70 on: April 28, 2016, 11:37:30 »

Whilst there might not be much prospect of residential development in the area given the potential for flooding, there is an awful lot of industrial development going into the Distribution Park, so much so that an additional junction for the M49 is planned. The Range are building a big centre, and Lidl have just signed up.
 
There are a *lot* of people going to be working on that estate, much of it in labour-intensive warehousing type jobs. Perhaps it might not be a daft idea to rebuild Pilning Station as a station for the estate with a new link road? Employers could then run shuttle buses to the station at shift changes and other times.

It obviously wouldn't be a cheap project, but it would make the estate much more accessible to job seekers across Gloucestershire, Bristol and South Wales, so it would be in the employer's interests, plus very eco and good PR (Public Relations).   
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: April 28, 2016, 12:49:19 »

In that case could developers contribute to the improvements to the station.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #72 on: April 28, 2016, 14:43:24 »

Employers could then run shuttle buses to the station at shift changes and other times. 

A shuttle bus service already exists for the Avonmouth industrial area. An extension to the SevernNet Flyer service would be all that is required.

http://severnnet.org/workareas/transport/bus-services/severnnet-flyer/
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 514


View Profile
« Reply #73 on: April 29, 2016, 10:50:41 »

Employers could then run shuttle buses to the station at shift changes and other times. 

A shuttle bus service already exists for the Avonmouth industrial area. An extension to the SevernNet Flyer service would be all that is required.

http://severnnet.org/workareas/transport/bus-services/severnnet-flyer/

But to use it you have to get to Avonmouth station along the Severn Beach line, which isn't massively attractive for many people.

With Pilning you can have the Cardiff to Bristol stoppers calling in, which would make it very attractive for a lot of South Wales and north Bristol. 

I suspect though the problem is that calling at Pilning would mess up the train pathing through the tunnel.
Logged
Oliver
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile Email
« Reply #74 on: June 19, 2016, 13:23:16 »

Hi all, long time lurker, first time poster.....

This is something seemingly not very many people were aware of, i think it is a travesty that they are going to close the down platform. Pilning is a undervalued asset.

The copies of NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s letters are included in the below publication.

FOSBR (Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways) (Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways) are most unimpressed and are writing to Office of Rail and Road ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) and Western Enterprise Partnership WEP regarding this.

http://www.fosbr.org.uk/files/20160615_pilningpr.pdf
« Last Edit: July 06, 2016, 21:24:10 by grahame » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 12
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page