Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:55 12 Oct 2024
 
- P&O owner to attend summit despite row over minister's comments
- Woman dies after going overboard from cruise ship
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/10/24 - BoA Public Transport talk
25/10/24 - Melksham Transport Group
16/11/24 - Special Bletchey to Bicester
27/11/24 - WWRUG, Trowbridge

On this day
12th Oct (1903)
Steam motors enter regular service with GWR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:35 London Paddington to Paignton
17:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:35 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
17:44 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
17:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:30 Penzance to Plymouth
19:52 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:20 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
Short Run
13:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:58 Exmouth to Paignton
19:01 Severn Beach to Frome
19:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
19:13 Salisbury to Gloucester
19:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
19:42 Paignton to Exmouth
20:13 London Paddington to Swindon
20:35 Banbury to Didcot Parkway
20:59 Cardiff Central to Exeter St Davids
21:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Portsmouth & Southsea
22:04 Banbury to Didcot Parkway
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
October 12, 2024, 19:02:26 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[197] London City Airport expansion approved
[68] Go ahead given to new railway stations and SWML upgrade Cardif...
[53] Shortage of train crews on Great Western Railway - ongoing dis...
[38] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
[35] 'I'm facing court over £1.90 rail ticket error'
[32] 11th October 2024 - Travelwatch Southwest general meeting, Tau...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13]
  Print  
Author Topic: Pilning - the station, services, viability and closure of down platform - ongoing discussion  (Read 120786 times)
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1517



View Profile
« Reply #180 on: April 30, 2023, 13:27:21 »

Driving around the Culm valley the other day was a nightmare with the numerous potholes camouflaged as puddles in the rain. Slow progress in order to avoid them where possible!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42096



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #181 on: November 05, 2023, 06:51:17 »

Flagging up "on this day" - 7 years since the removal of the Pilning footbridge.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5370


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #182 on: July 17, 2024, 17:05:58 »

Quote
Where building happens should in part be guided by existing and proposed transport infrastructure. [...] Pilning station to the north of the city is surrounded by an area of green fields which is designated as greenbelt. It is an excellent example of where much more could be gained from existing transport infrastructure if development were allowed to happen. If 800 metres of land was released around this station, building on this land at 40 to 50 units per hectare would provide 7,500 to 9,500 new homes. Doing this around all stations within 45 minutes of central Bristol would provide an extra 55,200 homes.
Source: Ship shape? How the planning system is holding back Bristol’s economy, centreforcities
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42096



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #183 on: July 17, 2024, 17:21:45 »

Quote
Where building happens should in part be guided by existing and proposed transport infrastructure. [...] Pilning station to the north of the city is surrounded by an area of green fields which is designated as greenbelt. It is an excellent example of where much more could be gained from existing transport infrastructure if development were allowed to happen. If 800 metres of land was released around this station, building on this land at 40 to 50 units per hectare would provide 7,500 to 9,500 new homes. Doing this around all stations within 45 minutes of central Bristol would provide an extra 55,200 homes.
Source: Ship shape? How the planning system is holding back Bristol’s economy, centreforcities


So that's roughly 20,000 residents (at 2.3 to 2.4 per home).  The 800 metre radius circle looks like:



P.S. - but is there any employment or road infrastructure anywhere near?
« Last Edit: July 17, 2024, 17:34:28 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42096



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #184 on: July 17, 2024, 17:27:50 »

The 8 stations I picked out to map at http://www.passenger.chat/28888 were Narberth, Buckenham, Finstock, Pilning, Chetnole, Langwathby, Achnasellach and Swale (I think, it's a few days back and a lot has happened).
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19111



View Profile
« Reply #185 on: July 17, 2024, 21:05:41 »

P.S. - but is there any employment or road infrastructure anywhere near?

I think I can see a couple of rural lanes and the odd lock-up unit nearby. Tongue
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12747


View Profile Email
« Reply #186 on: July 17, 2024, 21:13:06 »

That'll be the problem with Finstock too.

Better those go at Worcester Parkway (even more) or say Moreton-in-Marsh.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42096



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #187 on: July 17, 2024, 21:31:24 »

P.S. - but is there any employment or road infrastructure anywhere near?

I think I can see a couple of rural lanes and the odd lock-up unit nearby. Tongue


That'll be the problem with Finstock too.

Better those go at Worcester Parkway (even more) or say Moreton-in-Marsh.

I - err - wrote with a degree of sarcasm about Pilning there, Chris - the Severnside Industrial Park would neighbour the new housing to the south east, with its own special junction off the M49.

Now Chetnole is very much lanes, and Achnashellach is too far from just about everything!

Edit to correct my spelling - five mistakes in two sentence was bad even for me!
« Last Edit: July 18, 2024, 09:33:11 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 550


View Profile
« Reply #188 on: July 22, 2024, 15:00:18 »

Quote
Where building happens should in part be guided by existing and proposed transport infrastructure. [...] Pilning station to the north of the city is surrounded by an area of green fields which is designated as greenbelt. It is an excellent example of where much more could be gained from existing transport infrastructure if development were allowed to happen. If 800 metres of land was released around this station, building on this land at 40 to 50 units per hectare would provide 7,500 to 9,500 new homes. Doing this around all stations within 45 minutes of central Bristol would provide an extra 55,200 homes.
Source: Ship shape? How the planning system is holding back Bristol’s economy, centreforcities

Perhaps I'm being a pessimist, but not sure that building 9500 new homes around 22 feet above sea level would be the smartest move in the world.

By contrast, there's plenty of land between Yate/Chipping Sodbury/Coalpit Heath/Winterbourne and the M4 which would be be ideal for housing if the railway could  have another pair of tracks to enable a 15-minute service. 
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18523


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #189 on: July 22, 2024, 21:19:53 »


Perhaps I'm being a pessimist, but not sure that building 9500 new homes around 22 feet above sea level would be the smartest move in the world.


Excellent point.  That's what's been pointed out to various developers who want to build more houses to the west and north of Nailsea.

It's lovely pasture in the summer, but in the winter much of it is under surface water.  Roll Eyes

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42096



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #190 on: September 08, 2024, 06:41:24 »

"On this day" flags up the opening of New Passage Pier on 8th September 1863, but the web site that hosted the original article is no more.  We do host (for members only due to copyright) a list of stations bypassed at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/mirror/bypass_stations.pdf which makes fascinating reading.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2416


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #191 on: September 08, 2024, 10:31:28 »

"On this day" flags up the opening of New Passage Pier on 8th September 1863, but the web site that hosted the original article is no more.  We do host (for members only due to copyright) a list of stations bypassed at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/mirror/bypass_stations.pdf which makes fascinating reading.

Bah, tapping the link brings up the message "file can't be downloaded securely" on my android phone.
If it's the New Passage pier at Severn Beach, as I believe it is, I'll actually be down that way later this month so might incorporate that into my stroll.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42096



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #192 on: September 08, 2024, 10:40:47 »

Bah, tapping the link brings up the message "file can't be downloaded securely" on my android phone.
If it's the New Passage pier at Severn Beach, as I believe it is, I'll actually be down that way later this month so might incorporate that into my stroll.

I am very much aware of http v https issues - what comes of being an 18 month project that's been running 18 years.  Much work underway but I beyond comments already made not saying anything more at present. The thing about R&D is that you don't know for sure if you'll succeed until you do!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2096



View Profile
« Reply #193 on: September 08, 2024, 10:46:33 »

As a matter of interest, this was Pilning yesterday (7th September 2024). Picture and comment taken from a FB post by Ashford Clark and reproduced here with permission.


Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page