Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:55 28 Mar 2024
* Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Delayed
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 17:02:24 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 79 80 [81] 82 83 ... 114
  Print  
Author Topic: Crossrail/Elizabeth Line. From construction to operation - ongoing discussion  (Read 587016 times)
MVR S&T
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 438


View Profile
« Reply #1200 on: April 26, 2019, 23:54:58 »

Wish our current PM would get on with her current project...
Logged
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 547


View Profile
« Reply #1201 on: April 27, 2019, 19:52:39 »

Wish our current PM would get on with her current project...

But any methodology requires:
  • A clear, concise definition of the requirements
  • Clear responsibilities
  • Identify risks and mitigating factors
  • etc
There is no way any of this was provided so the project is doomed to crash.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2019, 21:38:54 by eXPassenger » Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1202 on: May 03, 2019, 12:41:42 »

NAO Report into overspend etc. etc. issued today: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Completing-Crossrail.pdf
« Last Edit: May 03, 2019, 15:39:02 by SandTEngineer » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1203 on: May 03, 2019, 15:31:51 »

Mark Wild, the new Crossrail CEO (Chief Executive Officer), was on LBC this morning being questioned by Mr. Ferrari. He just confirmed, as far as possible, the amended implementation timetable and explained that the two primary issues were signalling integration & building Bond Street interchange. But I think we already knew that.

From Building

Quote
Wild said: “The reasons for the Bond Street delay are quite interesting actually and they are mostly that the tunnelling was a year late at Bond Street, so Bond Street is a year behind every other station because of the tunnelling back in 2014.

“The top priority at Bond Street is to get the subterranean areas in a position they can support the train rather than everybody waiting to get the train going because Bond Street isn’t quite ready and that’s why an intervention is needed at Bond Street.”

Wild said while he was not certain when Bond Street would open, he was confident the delay would not extend indefinitely.

He said: “It’s quite uncertain, but it wouldn’t be many months after the opening of stage three we are just not certain at the moment, but we will become certain.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 749


View Profile
« Reply #1204 on: May 03, 2019, 22:52:11 »

And now for something completely different similar:

http://cphpost.dk/news/further-delays-are-likely-to-metro-city-ring-opening.html

Quote
The new Metro City Ring was originally supposed to have opened in December 2018. That was postponed to the summer of 2019.

Now Metroselskabet, the company responsible for running and constructing the Metro, has just announced further delays could be on the cards.

This time it is because a number of the key targets in the building phase have not been met. There is a “lack of documentation for a significant number of tests, along with the physical work at the stations that should have been finished”, the company writes.

Logged
MVR S&T
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 438


View Profile
« Reply #1205 on: May 03, 2019, 23:54:41 »

Well making a train work does not seem to be easy for some:

https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/17615945.summer-opening-derailed-for-poole-park-miniature-railway/

And:

https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/17606397.noddy-train-investigation-likely-to-last-all-summer/

Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #1206 on: May 06, 2019, 06:43:00 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Radio 4 News reporting Crossrail is employing 479 drivers on a salary of up to £59,000 with no train services to drive.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1207 on: May 06, 2019, 07:18:07 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Radio 4 News reporting Crossrail is employing 479 drivers on a salary of up to £59,000 with no train services to drive.

Also in Daily Mail

Quote
Revealed: Crossrail pays 500 drivers £25million a year... despite the train line not opening until 2021!
Crossrail has employed 479 drivers at a £25million-a-year cost to the taxpayer
But the rail infrastructure project will not be fully open for another two years yet
Some of the train drivers employed by Crossrail are now working to test trains
The majority are working on the project’s partially open tracks on city outskirts

Only to be expected?   With a fleet of trains waiting to run on the line, it's natural that there was a fleet of drivers on hand to operate them;  just like trains, they take time to provide - you can't want into your local House of Fraser / Debenhams / Woolworths / Maplin / Marks and Spencer .... and pick them off the shelf just before they're needed
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1208 on: May 06, 2019, 08:12:20 »

Diamond Geezer's Blog has been running even longer than the Coffee Shop and last week he looked back at the history of Crossrail slippages ... ((here))

Quote
In 2004 I wrote..."2012: Crossrail (optimistic view); 2013: Crossrail (pessimistic view)"

etc ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 782


View Profile
« Reply #1209 on: May 06, 2019, 08:23:57 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Radio 4 News reporting Crossrail is employing 479 drivers on a salary of up to £59,000 with no train services to drive.

In his LBC interview of 26th April Mark Wild said that the drivers were being used for both testing and on the Paddington-Hayes/Heathrow & Liverpool Street-Shenfield services.

One of the parties telling porkies?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #1210 on: May 06, 2019, 08:40:49 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Radio 4 News reporting Crossrail is employing 479 drivers on a salary of up to £59,000 with no train services to drive.

Also in Daily Mail

Quote
Revealed: Crossrail pays 500 drivers £25million a year... despite the train line not opening until 2021!
Crossrail has employed 479 drivers at a £25million-a-year cost to the taxpayer
But the rail infrastructure project will not be fully open for another two years yet
Some of the train drivers employed by Crossrail are now working to test trains
The majority are working on the project’s partially open tracks on city outskirts

Only to be expected?   With a fleet of trains waiting to run on the line, it's natural that there was a fleet of drivers on hand to operate them;  just like trains, they take time to provide - you can't want into your local House of Fraser / Debenhams / Woolworths / Maplin / Marks and Spencer .... and pick them off the shelf just before they're needed

Unless it's me that's missing something obvious, I think the context of the story is that had Crossrail not been running years behind schedule, the drivers would not be lying (somewhat) idle for so long at such expense?
« Last Edit: May 06, 2019, 08:53:34 by TaplowGreen » Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #1211 on: May 06, 2019, 08:45:04 »


In his LBC interview of 26th April Mark Wild said that the drivers were being used for both testing and on the Paddington-Hayes/Heathrow & Liverpool Street-Shenfield services.

One of the parties telling porkies?

Yes and No. 345s are running the services mentioned plus  out on testing and driver training runs,  several past my house every day, it's just there aren't 479 driving  turns.

Logged
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1468


View Profile Email
« Reply #1212 on: May 06, 2019, 08:48:34 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Radio 4 News reporting Crossrail is employing 479 drivers on a salary of up to £59,000 with no train services to drive.

It would have been good if FGW (First Great Western) had all or most of their IET (Intercity Express Train) drivers up and ready.  But, of course, there we no IET's ready for training.  Chicken and egg for them I guess.
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1213 on: May 09, 2019, 11:00:40 »

Further contracts let for GWML (Great Western Main Line) stations: http://www.infrastructure-intelligence.com/article/may-2019/network-rail-announces-new-contracts-crossrail-project-1
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #1214 on: May 09, 2019, 11:19:29 »

Unless it's me that's missing something obvious, I think the context of the story is that had Crossrail not been running years behind schedule, the drivers would not be lying (somewhat) idle for so long at such expense?

Looking on the bright side, the project task labelled 'Employ some drivers' appears to have been completed on time...

Presumably at least some of them will be required to do the testing and integration of the new trains?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 79 80 [81] 82 83 ... 114
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page