Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:15 19 Apr 2024
- Mystery over woman's lying in road crash death
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:23 London Paddington to Oxford
18:00 Oxford to London Paddington
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:23 London Paddington to Oxford
21:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
Delayed
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 16:22:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[269] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[101] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[44] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[41] Signage - not making it easy ...
[8] IETs at Melksham
[7] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 71 72 [73] 74 75 ... 114
  Print  
Author Topic: Crossrail/Elizabeth Line. From construction to operation - ongoing discussion  (Read 591132 times)
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #1080 on: December 10, 2018, 08:26:24 »

DD should get a job at the Treasury. Another place where they get their millions and billions muddled up ! And I mean Didcot Dean not David Davis !

But which definition of a billion do you use. I've heard a billion is a thousand million, i.e. nine zeros after the one but I've also encountered people who define a billion as a million million i.e twelve zeros after the one.

I use the thousand million version so I'll empty my money box and start counting 1p, 2p, 3p....
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #1081 on: December 10, 2018, 09:06:05 »

Although I could make up some story that I really meant 1 milliard on the old long scale, it was a late night typo by me for £1bn. It was Harold Wilson who set that the Government would use the short scale numbers exclusively in 1974, contrary to past UK (United Kingdom) practice plus that extensively elsewhere in Europe.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1082 on: December 10, 2018, 10:43:42 »

Although I could make up some story that I really meant 1 milliard on the old long scale, it was a late night typo by me for £1bn. It was Harold Wilson who set that the Government would use the short scale numbers exclusively in 1974, contrary to past UK (United Kingdom) practice plus that extensively elsewhere in Europe.

As my grandfather used to say "Good old Mr Wilson!" I have no ideas whether he meant it or not. It makes perfect sense to use what I was told at school were the American definitions of billion and trillion. It avoids confusion, and also means no-one ever has to say that Crossrail costs sixteen thousand million.
Logged

Now, please!
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #1083 on: December 10, 2018, 10:47:42 »

So they're looking for an extra £100 crore. Perhaps it's fallen into one of the tricky crevices between departments?
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #1084 on: December 10, 2018, 19:10:28 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) R4 reporting now the need for £2 billion to complete it, why not abandon the project and cancel HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) and instead we could have Portishead, the Henbury Loop, complete redoubling of the Cotswold Line, redoubling Thingley Junction to Bradford Junction including a rebuilt Melksham station with a buffet and full ticketing opportunities and passenger toilets for the regular no onboard toilet facilities services, Bradford North curve re-instatement and still have change left over to pay for Devizes Parkway.  Grin
Logged
nickswift99
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 145


View Profile
« Reply #1085 on: December 10, 2018, 19:18:01 »

Sounds excellent. Looking forward to seeing Melksham cope with hundreds of thousands of commuters a day. Perhaps we could also arrange for the Strategic War Reserve to be fitted with ATO (Automatic Train Operation) to run a high density service through Box Tunnel?  Wink
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5208


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #1086 on: December 10, 2018, 19:36:39 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) R4 reporting now the need for £2 billion to complete it, why not abandon the project and cancel HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) and instead we could have Portishead, the Henbury Loop, complete redoubling of the Cotswold Line, redoubling Thingley Junction to Bradford Junction including a rebuilt Melksham station with a buffet and full ticketing opportunities and passenger toilets for the regular no onboard toilet facilities services, Bradford North curve re-instatement and still have change left over to pay for Devizes Parkway.  Grin

You're forgetting the new Group Standard that insists on platinum rails, ebony sleepers and diamond crossings... £1BN wouldn't even get you a waiting shelter these days.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #1087 on: December 10, 2018, 20:04:44 »

This is TfL» (Transport for London - about)'s announcement. It contins the outline of the new funding agreed with HMG:
Quote
The emerging findings of the KPMG review into Crossrail Ltd's finances indicate the likely capital cost impact of the delay to the project announced in August could be in the region of between £1.6bn and £2bn. That includes the £300m already contributed by the Department for Transport (DfT» (Department for Transport - about)) and TfL in July 2018, leaving an estimated £1.3bn to £1.7bn to complete the project.

The Mayor of London and the Government have agreed a financial package to cover this. The Greater London Authority (GLA) will borrow up to £1.3bn from the DfT. The GLA will repay this loan from the existing Business Rate Supplement (BRS (Business Rates Supplement)) and Mayoral Community Infrastructure Levy (MCIL» (Mayor's Community Infrastructure Levy - about)). The GLA will also provide a £100m cash contribution, taking its total contribution to £1.4bn which it will provide as a grant to TfL for the Crossrail project.

Because the final costs of the Crossrail project are yet to be confirmed, a contingency arrangement has also been agreed between TfL and the Government. This will be in the form of a loan facility from the DfT of up to £750m, should the higher end of the estimate be realised.

This combined financing deal will replace the need for the £350 million interim financing package offered by the Government in October.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #1088 on: December 10, 2018, 20:22:10 »

One of the points made by Sadiq Khan was that he had ordered the release of all the CRL board minutes. They are here, but the last of them (they are monthly) is for September. A lot of the names and numbers are hidden by the big black marker pen, and while cost to completion and risk are given the meaning of the figures is not clear (to me, anyway). All the figures do, however look far too low relative to size of the just-announced bung. But someone else may be abel to make more sense of them.
Logged
rower40
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292

Turning signalling into a video game since 1988.


View Profile
« Reply #1089 on: December 11, 2018, 12:16:18 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) R4 reporting now the need for £2 billion to complete it, why not abandon the project
Shades of Marc Brunel's Thames Tunnel.  Built for freight but no money to build the access ramps, so was a pedestrian tunnel only.  The Crossrail tunnels, without connecting them to National Rail network at Westbourne Park and Pudding Mill Lane junctions, would make a lovely Trans-London cycle route.
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #1090 on: December 11, 2018, 15:21:43 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) R4 reporting now the need for £2 billion to complete it, why not abandon the project and cancel HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) and instead we could have Portishead, the Henbury Loop, complete redoubling of the Cotswold Line, redoubling Thingley Junction to Bradford Junction including a rebuilt Melksham station with a buffet and full ticketing opportunities and passenger toilets for the regular no onboard toilet facilities services, Bradford North curve re-instatement and still have change left over to pay for Devizes Parkway.  Grin

You're forgetting the new Group Standard that insists on platinum rails, ebony sleepers and diamond crossings... £1BN wouldn't even get you a waiting shelter these days.

........and the new rolling stock for Cardiff - Portsmouth with 3 abreast seating and Alpaca wool upholstery and carpets !
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #1091 on: December 13, 2018, 20:50:11 »

Burried away in the TfL» (Transport for London - about) Business Plan under "Mitigating the impact of the Crossrail delay"

Quote
Pursue implementation of Reading to Paddington services ahead of completion of the Elizabeth Line to partially mitigate revenue loss
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #1092 on: December 14, 2018, 06:10:28 »

Burried away in the TfL» (Transport for London - about) Business Plan under "Mitigating the impact of the Crossrail delay"

Quote
Pursue implementation of Reading to Paddington services ahead of completion of the Elizabeth Line to partially mitigate revenue loss

Sounds sensible.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #1093 on: December 14, 2018, 10:25:03 »

Indeed.  It’s a bit of a waste seeing dozens of brand new trains sat in Old Oak Common doing precious little, and would be rather embarrassing if that continued to be the case for years.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Dispatch Box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #1094 on: December 14, 2018, 11:42:23 »

Indeed.  It’s a bit of a waste seeing dozens of brand new trains sat in Old Oak Common doing precious little, and would be rather embarrassing if that continued to be the case for years.

Could,nt they use them on other lines for now, make sense would,nt it.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 71 72 [73] 74 75 ... 114
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page