Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:55 19 Apr 2024
- Mystery over woman's lying in road crash death
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:00 Oxford to London Paddington
18:18 St Erth to St Ives
18:33 St Ives to St Erth
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:23 London Paddington to Oxford
21:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 18:07:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[313] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[78] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[34] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[32] Signage - not making it easy ...
[6] IETs at Melksham
[6] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
  Print  
Author Topic: Is it time to campaign for an Open Access Operator in The GW area  (Read 45821 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #30 on: January 03, 2008, 10:25:10 »

This is going to happen once the 2nd platform opens at newquay anyway, so its pointless in an open access for newquay

This proposal is listed under "Route enhancement aspirations" in the Network Rail Business Plan 2007, which means that it hasnt been approved yet.

Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 03, 2008, 22:06:26 »



This is going to happen once the 2nd platform opens at newquay anyway, so its pointless in an open access for newquay




Whats going to Happen once the 2nd platform opens at Newquay? A thourgh service to London NON STOP from Plymouth, at least with 2 platforms at Newquay there's more train paths for a Open access operator! Bring it on!
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 03, 2008, 22:11:15 »



This is going to happen once the 2nd platform opens at newquay anyway, so its pointless in an open access for newquay




Whats going to Happen once the 2nd platform opens at Newquay? A thourgh service to London NON STOP from Plymouth, at least with 2 platforms at Newquay there's more train paths for a Open access operator! Bring it on!

No there isn't

iirc there are no loops on the newquay branch. Hence the dire service.

Newquay > london woulnd't be financially viable for an open access anyway, especially when there are fast and cheaper alternatives, and FGW (First Great Western) going to be operating a service anyway. And the fact that plymouth has an ample service to london. There really is no need.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2008, 22:14:37 by Shazz » Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 04, 2008, 10:35:22 »

The line at Newquay has two passing places; Goonbarrow and St Blazey (just round the corner from Par) hence how the summer TT manages to cope.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 04, 2008, 11:04:33 »

The line at Newquay has two passing places; Goonbarrow and St Blazey (just round the corner from Par) hence how the summer TT manages to cope.
Technicly speaking it's actually double track from Par-St Blazey as there's a box at each end of the "loop" and no Token, They could do with the loop put back at St Dennis Junction really, then an hourly service can run, as it is now then it's not quite possible to run hourly as it takes about 30 mins from Goonbarrow to Newquay, however, two platforms at Newquay would solve this! The problem with the current Newquay service is that the four trains they do have are timed quite badly, first train from Newquay is at 1018, OK that train does connect with the up "riviera" at Par but thats the only London connection without changing again at Plymouth, also, there is the stupid gap in the afternoon between 1452 and 2023 whilst the unit is nicked to work the peak Gunnislake service. In terms of local traffic Newquay is the opposite way around to all of the other branches as Newquay is catually the place where the local traffic flows go to, on all the other lines i.e. Falmouth then most people are going AWAY from the branch and going into Truro etc, also remember Newquay is the second largest town in Cornwall, it's got a higher population than Truro!
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 04, 2008, 12:32:13 »

Agree with Vacman, the service to Newquay is worse than useless, however it was an EYE OPENNER for FGW (First Great Western) at just how busy the Summertime Daily HST (High Speed Train) to/from Newquay was. Don't tell me there's no demand for Trains to from Newquay.

That's why I think it's perfect for open access operator.

You don't get a demand for Trains if you don't provide the Sevice!
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: January 04, 2008, 12:37:09 »

Agree with Vacman, the service to Newquay is worse than useless, however it was an EYE OPENNER for FGW (First Great Western) at just how busy the Summertime Daily HST (High Speed Train) to/from Newquay was. Don't tell me there's no demand for Trains to from Newquay.

That's why I think it's perfect for open access operator.

You don't get a demand for Trains if you don't provide the Sevice!
It was an eye opener, this year the direct weekday service to Newquay is running for an extra week at the end of the summer! The 6 hour gap in the afternoon is set to dissapear this summer aswell, all we need now is an early morning service for people to go into Newquay for work/school. when Wessex ran 8 trains per day in the summer of 2005 they ran an early morning service from May-October and school children started using it! so there is a demand there!
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 04, 2008, 12:42:27 »

Get rid of First Class on the Newquay service, it was empty whilst standard was heaving!
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 04, 2008, 13:38:25 »

Get rid of First Class on the Newquay service, it was empty whilst standard was heaving!

Interesting thought have an HST (High Speed Train) that's all  Standard Class, expect the First Class Passengers from all places west of Paddington would be jumping.
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: January 04, 2008, 15:05:48 »

Agree with Vacman, the service to Newquay is worse than useless, however it was an EYE OPENNER for FGW (First Great Western) at just how busy the Summertime Daily HST (High Speed Train) to/from Newquay was. Don't tell me there's no demand for Trains to from Newquay.

That's why I think it's perfect for open access operator.


Now if you read what i'm saying again, you'll see that i'm saying that it's not FINANCIALLY VIABLE not the demand isnt there.

Firstly, there is little to no rolling stock "spare" in the UK (United Kingdom). So for a london bound service they would have to invest in at least 5 new trains (to give a rough every 3 hourly service)
Secondly, the line through reading is almost at it's peak capacity, if not at it already. So they'd quite probably have to use a different london station.
Thirdly, i'm not sure what "protection" there is on firsts service, however most new franchises have this. Which means it's about 5 years into the franchise before this could actually happen (if fgw have protection)
And finally, FGW and already established and highly profitable business is incredibly likely going to be running them if/when platform 2 opens anyway. An open access operator won't be able to compete on prices on the short term, and could be priced out of the market.

Sure, the demand is there. But it's not worth someone investing MILLIONS of pounds, for something that might never make a profit.


« Last Edit: January 04, 2008, 15:12:10 by Shazz » Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #40 on: January 04, 2008, 15:09:49 »

And finally, FGW (First Great Western) and already established and highly profitable business is going to be running them once platform 2 opens anyway.

If platform 2 opens. See earlier quote :

This is going to happen once the 2nd platform opens at newquay anyway, so its pointless in an open access for newquay

This proposal is listed under "Route enhancement aspirations" in the Network Rail Business Plan 2007, which means that it hasnt been approved yet.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: January 04, 2008, 15:12:36 »

And finally, FGW (First Great Western) and already established and highly profitable business is going to be running them once platform 2 opens anyway.

If platform 2 opens. See earlier quote :

This is going to happen once the 2nd platform opens at newquay anyway, so its pointless in an open access for newquay

This proposal is listed under "Route enhancement aspirations" in the Network Rail Business Plan 2007, which means that it hasnt been approved yet.

see my edit Tongue
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #42 on: January 04, 2008, 15:30:40 »

And finally, FGW (First Great Western) and already established and highly profitable business is going to be running them once platform 2 opens anyway.

If platform 2 opens. See earlier quote :

This is going to happen once the 2nd platform opens at newquay anyway, so its pointless in an open access for newquay

This proposal is listed under "Route enhancement aspirations" in the Network Rail Business Plan 2007, which means that it hasnt been approved yet.

see my edit Tongue

Seen and noted  Smiley
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #43 on: January 04, 2008, 18:12:32 »


Firstly, there is little to no rolling stock "spare" in the UK (United Kingdom). So for a london bound service they would have to invest in at least 5 new trains (to give a rough every 3 hourly service)



What about Mk2 (Mark 2 coach) carriages with a DVT(resolve) and a Loco?

To avoid London, why not go to Oxford (connexion to Read. and London at Didcot)?

Or perhaps to the West/East Midlands?
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: January 04, 2008, 18:26:29 »


Firstly, there is little to no rolling stock "spare" in the UK (United Kingdom). So for a london bound service they would have to invest in at least 5 new trains (to give a rough every 3 hourly service)



What about Mk2 (Mark 2 coach) carriages with a DVT(resolve) and a Loco?

Yes those are an option, but they'd need a severe refit.

So eventually some new rolling stock would need to be found.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page