Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:55 29 Mar 2024
- Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 13:56:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Anger at 80ft Network Rail mast in Cornwall  (Read 15751 times)
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2011, 13:04:13 »

Network Rail do not need planning permission for Items associated with the running of the Railway,
So Signals, Retaining walls, Relay rooms, Signal boxes, etc, do not need planning permission, but buildings not associated with direct running operation do need planning permission.

It's not always the case that NR» (Network Rail - home page) don't need planning permission.
Logged
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 642


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2011, 17:52:49 »

I'll add that a Satellite solution is already implemented for similar needs in Canada, Australia, the US, Japan and China. Indeed a test was done in the late 1990's in the UK (United Kingdom). Satellite availablility in cuttings and tunnels would be on a par with a land based radio solution. NR» (Network Rail - home page) aren't wiring tunnels are they? Telemetry would fed back on next acquisition.

It wouldn't need dedicated satellites or Ground Facilities, these could be provided on a leased basis and with appropriate diversity of uplinks and backhauls to and from the UK anywhere within the Satellite Footprint. For a fleet of 10-20K vehicles, which I imagine to be all mobile trains in the UK at any one time,  the Access Control System would only be a couple of rack based PCs together with the associated modems. The advantages would be enormous with GPRS (General Packet Radio Service) feedback instantly to a central resource.

The power requirements onboard the trains would be commensurate with a few mobile phone chargers. Satcom uplinks aren't energy gobblers, as the Iridium hand helds demonstrate. A small dish assembly mounted on the roof of the train would be needed.

Incidentally, I do know what I'm talking about with almost 25 years in Satellite Comms dealing with Maritime, Land based and Aeronautical Mobile Applications at Goonhilly.
Logged
MrC
Full Member
***
Posts: 45


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2011, 19:04:59 »

I'll add that a Satellite solution is already implemented for similar needs in Canada, Australia, the US, Japan and China.
.....

Interesting - I sit corrected  Smiley

However, having had a very quick look around the few satellite based communications and control (as opposed to just positioning) systems there appear to be a number of identified problems (such as reliability in tunnels, cuttings, built-up areas and in high speed/density rail networks) which raise some question marks, whereas GSM-R (Global System for Mobile communications - Railway.) is more of a known working product and available off the shelf now. The train control systems using satellite based positioning systems still require land based comms of some type, and many seem to be still in the proving or pilot stages.

Oh, and GSM-R (as well as the older CSR (Cab Secure Radio); not sure about NRN (National Radio Network)) does cater for tunnels. I suppose being momentarily out of data comms contact in a small tunnel can be allowed for by having balises etc in the relevant places (but you'd still have issues with stop orders), however any large tunnels or a concentration of tunnels could be an issue. You could allow for this by having alternative comms setups around these areas but you're adding development time, complexity and cost while GSM-R still works. There's a separate issue for voice comms where you need guaranteed availability at all times.

So it looks like satellite will be useful in the future, but we aren't there yet so ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System.)/GSM-R is what we get today.
Logged
peterswest
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 26


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2011, 09:20:28 »

I think that you will get the " Green" mast option from Network Rail , this seems to happen when a mast is seen to be an "eyesore" to the local area . They could , of course , try the " tree" looking option  , there is one on rattery bank , between Totnes and Marley tunnel ! Next time yr on a train , see if you can pick it out ( easier in the Winter)  Smiley
 n.b The tree one was put up by mobile phone companies ,its not for GSMR !
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 06, 2011, 16:21:05 »

I think that you will get the " Green" mast option from Network Rail , this seems to happen when a mast is seen to be an "eyesore" to the local area . They could , of course , try the " tree" looking option  , there is one on rattery bank , between Totnes and Marley tunnel ! Next time yr on a train , see if you can pick it out ( easier in the Winter)  Smiley
 n.b The tree one was put up by mobile phone companies ,its not for GSMR !

There is also one on Hill Head in Torbay. Peculiar looking things...
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18896



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 13, 2011, 20:36:52 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Protests over railway radio masts in Devon and Cornwall

MPs (Member of Parliament) and people in Devon and Cornwall living near planned railway radio masts have criticised the structures which do not need planning permission.

The 95ft (29m) tall masts are being put up along main and branch lines for new digital radio communications equipment.

Protesters said there should be more consultation with nearby residents over their installation.

Network Rail said the masts were necessary and erected within the law and it worked to reduce visual impact.

The masts are among 2,200 being built across the country by Network Rail to improve communications between drivers and signallers and reduce the risk of serious accidents.

System recommended

After the Ladbroke Grove railway accident in 1999, where 31 people died and more than 500 were injured, the Cullen Report recommended a new communications system.

The masts do not need planning permission because Network Rail has permitted development rights. But it is obliged to consult councils, MPs and residents who live within 660ft (200m) of any site.

Geoffrey Cox, Conservative MP for Torridge and West Devon, said Network Rail should consult with those affected early on.

"A company [Network Rail] that really wants to endear its support to the public would want to consult people straight away," he said.

Construction work has begun on a mast in Bere Ferrers in the Tamar Valley in Devon.

Critics claim the mast, and others due to be built at nearby Bere Alston and Calstock in Cornwall, will stand out in an area of extreme natural beauty.

Bere Ferris parish councillor Brian Lamb added that critics were not sure if such masts were needed on all branch lines.

"It's a just a single-track line and we cannot see any justification for this," he said.

Network Rail said: "Our aim is to make the railways safer and more reliable for the passengers travelling everyday.

"When selecting a mast site, we take care to minimise any visual impact."

Sheryll Murray, the Conservative MP for South East Cornwall, is planning to meet the transport minister and has said she will be asking questions in the House of Commons about the matter.

The Department for Transport said Network Rail was "best placed to make a decision about the location of a new mast".
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 642


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 13, 2011, 23:15:15 »

There really is no justification for the railway having such planning permission exemption, if Arqiva had to gain planning permission to place new Digital Terrestrial antennae on every transmitter in the Country as part of Digital Switchover there's no reason why ALL railway construction shouldn't have to go through gaining permission.

Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 14, 2011, 15:01:57 »

Whilst it's certainly an oddity of planning law that railway companies can built more or less whatever they like within the boundaries of their property, I think the comparison between a safety-critical radio system that's needed for the operation of the railway and digital TV masts is a little spurious.
Logged
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 642


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 14, 2011, 15:28:24 »

Whether it's safety critical or not PP should be required, if so more care would be exercised in the design and functional requirements for such systems.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: March 14, 2011, 15:48:08 »

To be fair, even where Network Rail do not need to go through the 'normal' planning permission process, they are still obliged to consult councils, MPs (Member of Parliament) and residents who live within 660ft (200m) of any site.

As I understand it, it was the 'administrative oversight' of that requirement at Sandplace that led them to suspend work for a month there, while such a consultation was conducted.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
old original
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 877


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 14, 2011, 17:26:28 »

If it's for any official or national scheme, I think the planning permission thing is a bit of a red herring really. How many of the hundreds of mobile 'phone masts and police tetra masts that, theoretically, have needed permission to be put up over the last 10 years or so, ever got refused?
Logged

8 Billion people on a wet rock - of course we're not happy
peterswest
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 26


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: March 14, 2011, 17:32:08 »

Perhaps the residents of Bere Alston and Sandplace can club together and provide the consultation fees as to the plans  they want instead ?
 Take a peek at the mast just to the north of Plymouth station when your next travelling on a train...... now thats worth complaining about if you lived the 20-30 odd metres away from it , but... its up already !
pete
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #27 on: April 01, 2011, 16:32:48 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Plans for railway radio mast in Cornwall abandoned

The building of an 80ft (24m) railway communications mast between Liskeard and Looe in Cornwall has been halted after opposition from nearby residents.

Network Rail was criticised for poor consultation over plans for the mast.

The company said it was considering building several smaller masts along the branch line instead.

It said its new national communications system for train drivers would improve safety and help safeguard the future of branch lines.

Representatives of Network Rail met with objectors and local councillors on Thursday to discuss the mast plans and concerns over its location in Sandplace and its height.

Critic Steve Wright, who lives directly opposite where the mast was to be completed, said they "immediately agreed that the position was unacceptable".

He said: "It was as totally different approach by them and they were willing to listen and consider the arguments we put forward. Visually it was terrible. It ruined the whole look of Sandplace; and there were other considerations, such as it being a road hazard. I think that finally they felt they had to listen to us."

Network Rail said it was pleased to have been able to work with residents to reach a satisfactory compromise. It said: "The unique topography and operation of the Looe Valley railway has allowed us to consider an alternative solution, which could be less intrusive to residents yet achieve 100% communication coverage to run trains safely."

The company said it had invited key community representatives to help identify replacement sites for the smaller structures and that it hoped to present new plans in May.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2011, 20:11:26 by chris from nailsea » Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 15, 2011, 19:29:19 »

I don't take prisoners, let's cause NR» (Network Rail - home page) a BIG HEADACHE.

Penzance Station is I understand a LISTED building.

So who allowed Network Rail to remove the Top Light windows on the roof of Penzance station clearly seen from the road outside the Longboat Hotel?

 
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 15, 2011, 20:17:58 »

Just a thought, but possibly the planning authority? A building being listed doesn't mean that it cannot be touched at any point in the future, just that there needs to be a consultation process and permission given before any major alterations happen.

And just as an afterthought, I can't find a listing for the station here. Not sure how authoratative that databse is, or if I've just missed it, but there's a chance you're mistaken about it being listed in the first place.

By the way, what's the relevance of this to the erection of radio masts...? Wink
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page