Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:55 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:24 Exmouth to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 08:57:51 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[72] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[67] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[66] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[59] Return of the BRUTE?
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Passengers soar on Chiltern - what can we in FGW land expect from Oxford?  (Read 20653 times)
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« on: January 09, 2012, 19:32:00 »

Passengers have deserted Virgin in their droves to travel from Warwick Parkway, Solihil and Birmingham Moor Street on Chiltern's new "Mainline" service which is nice and fast. Passenger numbers are up 200,000 - which is a jaw dropping increase. Revenue is up 65% despite Chiltern slashing peak fares.

One can easily see why:
*The delightful Moor Street station vs the congested New Street (which will remain congested after the upgrade)
*Spacious Mark 3 carriages vs Pendolinos with small windows.
*Trains no longer have to stop at smaller stations, as Chiltern have introduced extra shuttles.
*Fares are reasonable and an upgrade to the business zone is free/^10/^20.

I've posted this because of the imminent Oxford service. How will Chiltern transform this route?
*Journey times will probably be shorter, as driving to Water Eaton will be quicker than driving to OXF» (Oxford - next trains) for most commuters.
*Clubmans vs non guaranteed Turbos/180s/HSTs (High Speed Train)
*Lower fares, less restrictions
*Better reliability and punctuality
*Same frequency (not counting slow services)
*New/improved links to Bicester, HW Wembley Stadium.
*East West rail coming soon

I think exciting times lie ahead for Oxford commuters. I wonder how OXF will deal with several rail and coach companies competing for commuters - it can only be good.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2012, 20:30:38 »

Passenger numbers are up 200,000 - which is a jaw dropping increase.

That may be true, but without an indication of over what time period the 200,000 increase was observed, and what the number was beforehand (in effect allowing us to work that out as a percentage increase) the absolute number alone is entirely meaningless.

BTW (by the way), what's your source? Sounds like a Chiltern press release but I suspect there may be a reason for that... Wink
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2012, 21:04:04 »

http://www.birminghammail.net/news/birmingham-news/2012/01/09/railway-revamp-leads-to-business-boom-for-moor-street-station-and-chiltern-railways-97319-30082907/?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2012, 21:08:56 »

Passenger numbers are up 200,000 - which is a jaw dropping increase.

That may be true, but without an indication of over what time period the 200,000 increase was observed, and what the number was beforehand (in effect allowing us to work that out as a percentage increase) the absolute number alone is entirely meaningless.

They're not up 200,000, they're up 50,000 or 25%.  Btline needs to read the articles he quotes from in a little more detail.  Still good figures, mind.

"Chiltern Railways has revealed journey totals on its Birmingham to London link, including passengers using stations at Moor Street, Dorridge, Solihull and Warwick Parkway, had soared to 200,000 for the September to December period, up by a quarter."

My emphasis in bold.


Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2012, 21:12:42 »

If they are up by a quarter, then they will have increased from 160,000 to 200,000, ie a 40,000 increase.  If the increase was 50,000 to 200,000 then it would have been "up by a third".

But still not up 200,000 either way!
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2012, 21:18:19 »

Btline, you have a maths detention.  Tongue
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2012, 22:39:29 »

I originally said 50,000 but changed it when i re-read the article. (honest) I think I got too excited by the higher figure! Shocked

Detention accepted but can we discuss the Oxford services? (i.e. FGW (First Great Western))
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2012, 11:41:01 »

Hmmm - 40,000 in 4 months.

That's 17 weeks. They also ran a ^10 go-anywhere offer on a lot of weekends in that period. THe B/zone is an abject failure, and the peak silver trains are still around half-full. I suspect that's TA being economical with his words. Most of those are off-peak and more than likely weekend travellers. Let's see what he says in May, for the January - April period.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2012, 11:59:53 »

Btline, where is your evidence that passengers have deserted Virgin?

Or are you simply in Daily Mail mode again... Wink
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2012, 12:19:46 »

The article does mention it....but doesn't use the 'deserted' word.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2012, 14:20:16 »

They are planning to extend the bursting at the seams Warwick Pway car park for the upteenth time. Passenger as far as way as Shropshire now use this station!

Car parks at Solihul are also rammed, and will be extended.

**Cough** Oxford.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2012, 14:45:54 »

Perhaps we already had a discussion about EG3 and Oxford, while you were away, and can't be bothered to repeat it?

Paul
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 10, 2012, 17:31:22 »

It's a shame that this post has (predictably) been shunted towards negativity. Chiltern opening up to Oxford has huge potential benefits for a FGW (First Great Western) region, so why the Chiltern bashing?

It's as if some people want Evergreen 3 to fail because they either live far away from Chiltern, or just so they can say "told you so". Even the teething troubles for the new timetable have been sorted, and hundreds of extra seats have been put onto peak time trains for Bucks commuters.

Chiltern have transformed a route, ignored by BR (British Rail(ways)) to brink of closure. Saved by NSE (Network South East), it was axed down to a branch line. It is now a major service. Commuters services have seen trains refurbished twice, new trains and excellent punctuality despite a 2 track entrance to London and sharing with intense LU, XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) and Centro services. Frankly, when you consider that some FGW stations are only just getting decent PISs (Passenger Information System) and still have unsuitable rolling stock, you can see what can be done with drive!

I cannot wait for the developments to Oxfordshire that will be brought...
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2012, 18:10:01 »

It's a shame that this post has (predictably) been shunted towards negativity.

I'm not sure it has, just that factual inaccuracies and hype in the initial post have been somewhat tempered with a bit of context and realism.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2012, 18:15:36 »

If you were to get away from being the 'Daily Mail' hype of the Coffeeshop, you might get some support.

 If you were to use Chiltern regularly you would realise that it's not as good in the heartlands where the majority of their customers live as you make it out to be.

Chiltern still have services in the high- & shoulder-peak that are regularly SRO (Standing Room Only). Commuters in the heartlands have lost their metro services to allow the Mainline trains more pathing space. The remaining services are regularly delayed to allow Mainline trains (running slightly late) to proceed unhindered.

You need to remember that prior to EG3, everyone had a service that Chiltern were rightly proud of & that their customer base were more than happy with. To allow Chiltern to tap the West Midlands market, commuters put up with months of disruption, late running engineering works sufficient to put the completion date back by a few months! And then got another 6-8 weeks of absolutely shocking disruption because the shoddy work was errr, shoddy.

It's only recently returned timings wise to acceptable. Note I said acceptable - they're still nowhere near the punctuality figure before they started - close to 99% peak MAA (Moving Annual Average). Not only that, but commuters have lost all those metro services and still suffer SRO on a number of services.

The few travellers from Leamington northwards to London are the only customers to have gained from this exercise - something which Chiltern knew from the outset & failed to tell the vast majorities in the heartlands until they realised for themselves after the completion. Yes, Chiltern seemed to have achieved their target of competing with Virgin - but this doesn't impress their majority in the heartlands who still see MainLine delaying their own services, almost on a daily basis.

Now, what about Oxford? What's new that we haven't talked about? Having made a raid on Virgin's customers, they're now going after FGWs (First Great Western). I'm all for competition, but as for improvements? Nahh, the regular route will lose even more services to make way for the Oxford flyers.

There will be more to talk about, once we know when any work might start - possibly at the May timetable change date, I guess.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page