First Great Western Passengers' Forum First Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Plymouth via Okehampton & Tavistock [link]
Current Running Last 2 days Acronyms & Abbreviations Station Comparator First Great Western co. site
December 04, 2008, 01:11:31 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Cotswold Line ORR approval  (Read 1321 times)
IanL
Full Member
***
Posts: 80


View Profile
« on: June 05, 2008, 01:54:19 PM »

Oxford Mail article

http://www.thisisoxfordshire.co.uk/display.var.2321572.0.cotswold_line_dualling_goahead.php

A SECTION of the Cotswold railway line in Oxfordshire is to be dualled, Oxfordshire County
Council transport chiefs have been told today.

The Office of Rail Regulation has confirmed to Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly that it has approved
the funding - meaning that the final obstacle has been cleared, allowing Network Rail to lay 20 miles
of new track between Charlbury and Evesham, including the section from Charlbury to Ascott-under-Wychwood.

The Cotswold Line was reduced to a single track in many places by British Rail in the early 1970s.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1291



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2008, 05:57:54 PM »

Oxford Mail article

http://www.thisisoxfordshire.co.uk/display.var.2321572.0.cotswold_line_dualling_goahead.php

A SECTION of the Cotswold railway line in Oxfordshire is to be dualled, Oxfordshire County
Council transport chiefs have been told today.

The Office of Rail Regulation has confirmed to Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly that it has approved
the funding - meaning that the final obstacle has been cleared, allowing Network Rail to lay 20 miles
of new track between Charlbury and Evesham, including the section from Charlbury to Ascott-under-Wychwood.

The Cotswold Line was reduced to a single track in many places by British Rail in the early 1970s.

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

If you have yet to sign the petition - there is no need!

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Logged

Shocked OVER 400 SIGNATURES!!! Shocked
Thank you very much for signing "http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Cotswold/" Partial redoubling has been approved! Grin
Andy W
Full Member
***
Posts: 64



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2008, 06:38:44 PM »

Great news,

But this is not so good ......... http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/3bn+funding+cut+for+network+rail/2271972 Huh
Logged
chris from nailsea
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1636



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2008, 09:28:23 PM »

No: see also http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7437334.stm  Angry
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 988


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2008, 09:51:08 PM »

You wouldn't believe the headline on the Rail Regulator's website:-

ORR announces a package of measures to improve railway services

More spin than in a box full of old 78s.
Logged
chris from nailsea
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1636



View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2008, 09:55:41 PM »

More spin than in a box full of old 78s.

Showing our age, but some of our younger readers may not understand that one, John!  Grin
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 988


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2008, 10:17:25 PM »

http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/NewsItem.aspx?id=596

Also announced on FGW's website.

A 78? What came before downloads, then CD's, then LPs/singles. And then you're before my time (honest!)

Nothing beats a Linn Sondek in my opinion. The original, the best, and still made.
Logged
chris from nailsea
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1636



View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2008, 10:23:55 PM »

Thanks, John!  You're quite right - and I'm really feeling my age now!  Roll Eyes
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 437


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2008, 10:51:57 PM »

Quote
Great news,

But this is not so good .........

What this is all about is the issue of Network's Rail efficiency when it comes to spending money - and there is a widespread view within the industry that they have a long way to go to get costs down to the level of best practice in the US and Europe - and a lot of projects NR wants to implement that ORR doesn't view as essential to meet the requirements that the Government set out in its High Level Output Statement, which says what kind of a railway it wants to get for its money.

I have put a link in the 'More Good News' thread to the ORR documentation. Page 368 there includes a list of non-funded schemes at this stage, including Kemble-Swindon double track and Didcot-Oxford capacity enhancements.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1876



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2008, 10:53:51 PM »

Surely it would be more efficient to close the line for a larger block of time, such as a week and get hundreds of staff in to complete the job in one?
Logged
chris from nailsea
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1636



View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2008, 11:02:36 PM »

Well, that might work ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7195418.stm  Roll Eyes
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 437


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2008, 12:25:19 AM »

Quote
Surely it would be more efficient to close the line for a larger block of time, such as a week and get hundreds of staff in to complete the job in one?

As previously discussed in the feature of the month thread, there will certainly be a blockade between Moreton-in-Marsh and Evesham - latest suggestion I have heard is this could be up to six months.

Chris Bates, who is the FGW Customer Panel member for Banbury/Kingham to Oxford and Appleton has posted the following at Charlbury.info:

I have already discussed this with Network Rail & FGW and I am quietly confident that meetings to inform all on this line WILL be held locally well in advance of any works being started -- indeed, as soon as I have dates from NR, I will bring them here to enable everyone to plan holidays etc around the disruption.

NR will be working up the detail of this scheme over the coming weeks and possibly months - but I will stay in touch with both FGW and NR, and will report back as soon as there is more to impart.
Logged
Lee Fletcher
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4480


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2008, 12:55:58 AM »

Quote
Great news,

But this is not so good .........

What this is all about is the issue of Network's Rail efficiency when it comes to spending money - and there is a widespread view within the industry that they have a long way to go to get costs down to the level of best practice in the US and Europe - and a lot of projects NR wants to implement that ORR doesn't view as essential to meet the requirements that the Government set out in its High Level Output Statement, which says what kind of a railway it wants to get for its money.

I have put a link in the 'More Good News' thread to the ORR documentation. Page 368 there includes a list of non-funded schemes at this stage, including Kemble-Swindon double track and Didcot-Oxford capacity enhancements.

Related link.
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=7761.msg12493#msg12493
Logged
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2008, 02:48:57 AM »

Rival infrastructure company will lead to another Potters Bar, I reckon.
Logged
Lee Fletcher
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4480


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #14 on: June 07, 2008, 01:25:33 AM »

Oxford Mail article link on Cotswold line scheme approval.
http://www.oxfordmail.net/news/headlines/display.var.2325582.0.commuters_hail_rail_line_boost.php
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of First Great Western, and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk for the official First Great Western website. Please contact the adminstrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants